From: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@redhat.com>
To: Ian Rogers <irogers@google.com>
Cc: Andi Kleen <ak@linux.intel.com>,
Namhyung Kim <namhyung@kernel.org>,
John Garry <john.garry@huawei.com>,
Kajol Jain <kjain@linux.ibm.com>,
"Paul A . Clarke" <pc@us.ibm.com>,
Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@kernel.org>,
Kan Liang <kan.liang@linux.intel.com>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>,
Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>,
Alexander Shishkin <alexander.shishkin@linux.intel.com>,
linux-perf-users@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
eranian@google.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] perf metric: Reduce multiplexing with duration_time
Date: Sun, 28 Nov 2021 17:23:20 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <YaOs+DjuoQvuqIrC@krava> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20211124015226.3317994-1-irogers@google.com>
On Tue, Nov 23, 2021 at 05:52:26PM -0800, Ian Rogers wrote:
> It is common to use the same counters with and without
> duration_time. The ID sharing code treats duration_time as if it
> were a hardware event placed in the same group. This causes
> unnecessary multiplexing such as in the following example where
> l3_cache_access isn't shared:
>
> $ perf stat -M l3 -a sleep 1
>
> Performance counter stats for 'system wide':
>
> 3,117,007 l3_cache_miss # 199.5 MB/s l3_rd_bw
> # 43.6 % l3_hits
> # 56.4 % l3_miss (50.00%)
> 5,526,447 l3_cache_access (50.00%)
> 5,392,435 l3_cache_access # 5389191.2 access/s l3_access_rate (50.00%)
> 1,000,601,901 ns duration_time
>
> 1.000601901 seconds time elapsed
>
> Fix this by placing duration_time in all groups unless metric
> sharing has been disabled on the command line:
>
> $ perf stat -M l3 -a sleep 1
>
> Performance counter stats for 'system wide':
>
> 3,597,972 l3_cache_miss # 230.3 MB/s l3_rd_bw
> # 48.0 % l3_hits
> # 52.0 % l3_miss
> 6,914,459 l3_cache_access # 6909935.9 access/s l3_access_rate
> 1,000,654,579 ns duration_time
>
> 1.000654579 seconds time elapsed
>
> $ perf stat --metric-no-merge -M l3 -a sleep 1
>
> Performance counter stats for 'system wide':
>
> 3,501,834 l3_cache_miss # 53.5 % l3_miss (24.99%)
> 6,548,173 l3_cache_access (24.99%)
> 3,417,622 l3_cache_miss # 45.7 % l3_hits (25.04%)
> 6,294,062 l3_cache_access (25.04%)
> 5,923,238 l3_cache_access # 5919688.1 access/s l3_access_rate (24.99%)
> 1,000,599,683 ns duration_time
> 3,607,486 l3_cache_miss # 230.9 MB/s l3_rd_bw (49.97%)
>
> 1.000599683 seconds time elapsed
>
> v2. Doesn't count duration_time in the metric_list_cmp function that
> sorts larger metrics first. Without this a metric with duration_time
> and an event is sorted the same as a metric with two events,
> possibly not allowing the first metric to share with the second.
hum, isn't the change about adding duration_time in every metric?
or you could still end up with metric without duration_time
thanks,
jirka
>
> Signed-off-by: Ian Rogers <irogers@google.com>
> ---
> tools/perf/util/metricgroup.c | 42 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++--------
> 1 file changed, 33 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/tools/perf/util/metricgroup.c b/tools/perf/util/metricgroup.c
> index fffe02aae3ed..51c99cb08abf 100644
> --- a/tools/perf/util/metricgroup.c
> +++ b/tools/perf/util/metricgroup.c
> @@ -1115,13 +1115,27 @@ static int metricgroup__add_metric_sys_event_iter(const struct pmu_event *pe,
> return ret;
> }
>
> +/**
> + * metric_list_cmp - list_sort comparator that sorts metrics with more events to
> + * the front. duration_time is excluded from the count.
> + */
> static int metric_list_cmp(void *priv __maybe_unused, const struct list_head *l,
> const struct list_head *r)
> {
> const struct metric *left = container_of(l, struct metric, nd);
> const struct metric *right = container_of(r, struct metric, nd);
> + struct expr_id_data *data;
> + int left_count, right_count;
> +
> + left_count = hashmap__size(left->pctx->ids);
> + if (!expr__get_id(left->pctx, "duration_time", &data))
> + left_count--;
> +
> + right_count = hashmap__size(right->pctx->ids);
> + if (!expr__get_id(right->pctx, "duration_time", &data))
> + right_count--;
>
> - return hashmap__size(right->pctx->ids) - hashmap__size(left->pctx->ids);
> + return right_count - left_count;
> }
>
> /**
> @@ -1299,14 +1313,16 @@ static int build_combined_expr_ctx(const struct list_head *metric_list,
> /**
> * parse_ids - Build the event string for the ids and parse them creating an
> * evlist. The encoded metric_ids are decoded.
> + * @metric_no_merge: is metric sharing explicitly disabled.
> * @fake_pmu: used when testing metrics not supported by the current CPU.
> * @ids: the event identifiers parsed from a metric.
> * @modifier: any modifiers added to the events.
> * @has_constraint: false if events should be placed in a weak group.
> * @out_evlist: the created list of events.
> */
> -static int parse_ids(struct perf_pmu *fake_pmu, struct expr_parse_ctx *ids,
> - const char *modifier, bool has_constraint, struct evlist **out_evlist)
> +static int parse_ids(bool metric_no_merge, struct perf_pmu *fake_pmu,
> + struct expr_parse_ctx *ids, const char *modifier,
> + bool has_constraint, struct evlist **out_evlist)
> {
> struct parse_events_error parse_error;
> struct evlist *parsed_evlist;
> @@ -1314,12 +1330,19 @@ static int parse_ids(struct perf_pmu *fake_pmu, struct expr_parse_ctx *ids,
> int ret;
>
> *out_evlist = NULL;
> - if (hashmap__size(ids->ids) == 0) {
> + if (!metric_no_merge || hashmap__size(ids->ids) == 0) {
> char *tmp;
> /*
> - * No ids/events in the expression parsing context. Events may
> - * have been removed because of constant evaluation, e.g.:
> - * event1 if #smt_on else 0
> + * We may fail to share events between metrics because
> + * duration_time isn't present in one metric. For example, a
> + * ratio of cache misses doesn't need duration_time but the same
> + * events may be used for a misses per second. Events without
> + * sharing implies multiplexing, that is best avoided, so place
> + * duration_time in every group.
> + *
> + * Also, there may be no ids/events in the expression parsing
> + * context because of constant evaluation, e.g.:
> + * event1 if #smt_on else 0
> * Add a duration_time event to avoid a parse error on an empty
> * string.
> */
> @@ -1387,7 +1410,8 @@ static int parse_groups(struct evlist *perf_evlist, const char *str,
> ret = build_combined_expr_ctx(&metric_list, &combined);
>
> if (!ret && combined && hashmap__size(combined->ids)) {
> - ret = parse_ids(fake_pmu, combined, /*modifier=*/NULL,
> + ret = parse_ids(metric_no_merge, fake_pmu, combined,
> + /*modifier=*/NULL,
> /*has_constraint=*/true,
> &combined_evlist);
> }
> @@ -1435,7 +1459,7 @@ static int parse_groups(struct evlist *perf_evlist, const char *str,
> }
> }
> if (!metric_evlist) {
> - ret = parse_ids(fake_pmu, m->pctx, m->modifier,
> + ret = parse_ids(metric_no_merge, fake_pmu, m->pctx, m->modifier,
> m->has_constraint, &m->evlist);
> if (ret)
> goto out;
> --
> 2.34.0.rc2.393.gf8c9666880-goog
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-11-28 16:25 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-11-24 1:52 [PATCH v2] perf metric: Reduce multiplexing with duration_time Ian Rogers
2021-11-28 16:23 ` Jiri Olsa [this message]
2021-11-29 17:46 ` Ian Rogers
2021-11-30 18:11 ` Jiri Olsa
2021-11-30 19:24 ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=YaOs+DjuoQvuqIrC@krava \
--to=jolsa@redhat.com \
--cc=acme@kernel.org \
--cc=ak@linux.intel.com \
--cc=alexander.shishkin@linux.intel.com \
--cc=eranian@google.com \
--cc=irogers@google.com \
--cc=john.garry@huawei.com \
--cc=kan.liang@linux.intel.com \
--cc=kjain@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-perf-users@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mark.rutland@arm.com \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=namhyung@kernel.org \
--cc=pc@us.ibm.com \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).