From: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@redhat.com>
To: Ian Rogers <irogers@google.com>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>,
Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@kernel.org>,
Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>,
Alexander Shishkin <alexander.shishkin@linux.intel.com>,
Namhyung Kim <namhyung@kernel.org>,
linux-perf-users@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Stephane Eranian <eranian@google.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] perf header: Fix memory leaks
Date: Tue, 30 Nov 2021 19:15:19 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <YaZqN5UQfhBmgznT@krava> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAP-5=fVRE8dcDtivYaAm=DQze4d2966X7oWTWVzstzWeC-xeSw@mail.gmail.com>
On Mon, Nov 29, 2021 at 03:38:28PM -0800, Ian Rogers wrote:
> On Sun, Nov 28, 2021 at 7:47 AM Jiri Olsa <jolsa@redhat.com> wrote:
> >
> > On Thu, Nov 18, 2021 at 12:17:30PM -0800, Ian Rogers wrote:
> > > These leaks were found with leak sanitizer running "perf pipe recording
> > > and injection test". In pipe mode feat_fd may hold onto an events struct
> > > that needs freeing. When string features are processed they may
> > > overwrite an already created string, so free this before the overwrite.
> > >
> > > Signed-off-by: Ian Rogers <irogers@google.com>
> > > ---
> > > tools/perf/util/header.c | 15 ++++++++++-----
> > > 1 file changed, 10 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
> > >
> > > diff --git a/tools/perf/util/header.c b/tools/perf/util/header.c
> > > index 79cce216727e..e3c1a532d059 100644
> > > --- a/tools/perf/util/header.c
> > > +++ b/tools/perf/util/header.c
> > > @@ -2321,6 +2321,7 @@ static int perf_header__read_build_ids(struct perf_header *header,
> > > #define FEAT_PROCESS_STR_FUN(__feat, __feat_env) \
> > > static int process_##__feat(struct feat_fd *ff, void *data __maybe_unused) \
> > > {\
> > > + free(ff->ph->env.__feat_env); \
> >
> > hm, how is this set before this callback is triggered?
>
> I see it for cpuid which is initially set in:
> #0 perf_env__read_cpuid (env=0x62b000007240) at util/env.c:363
> #1 0x0000555556325153 in perf_env__cpuid (env=0x62b000007240) at util/env.c:456
> #2 0x00005555564002ff in evlist__init_trace_event_sample_raw
ok, I forgot we do this one, thanks for explanation
Acked-by: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@redhat.com>
jirka
> (evlist=0x61e000000080) at util/sample-raw.c:17
> #3 0x00005555563f01f4 in __perf_session__new (data=0x7fffffffb8b0,
> repipe=false, repipe_fd=-1, tool=0x7fffffffbaa0)
> at util/session.c:228
> #4 0x000055555615f26b in perf_session__new (data=0x7fffffffb8b0,
> tool=0x7fffffffbaa0) at util/session.h:70
> #5 0x000055555616d991 in cmd_report (argc=0, argv=0x7fffffffe468) at
> builtin-report.c:1408
> #6 0x00005555562f36b8 in run_builtin (p=0x5555586bacd0
> <commands+240>, argc=5, argv=0x7fffffffe468) at perf.c:313
> #7 0x00005555562f3c11 in handle_internal_command (argc=5,
> argv=0x7fffffffe468) at perf.c:365
> #8 0x00005555562f3fce in run_argv (argcp=0x7fffffffe240,
> argv=0x7fffffffe250) at perf.c:409
> #9 0x00005555562f47bd in main (argc=5, argv=0x7fffffffe468) at perf.c:539
>
> And then overwritten causing the leak:
> #0 0x00005555563b965a in process_cpuid (ff=0x7fffffffad50, data=0x0)
> at util/header.c:2333
> #1 0x00005555563c53d2 in perf_event__process_feature
> (session=0x62b000007200, event=0x621000006500) at util/header.c:4144
> #2 0x000055555615fdef in process_feature_event
> (session=0x62b000007200, event=0x621000006500) at builtin-report.c:230
> #3 0x00005555563fa033 in perf_session__process_user_event
> (session=0x62b000007200, event=0x621000006500, file_offset=868)
> at util/session.c:1668
> #4 0x00005555563fae08 in perf_session__process_event
> (session=0x62b000007200, event=0x621000006500, file_offset=868)
> at util/session.c:1803
> #5 0x00005555563fc4e6 in __perf_session__process_pipe_events
> (session=0x62b000007200) at util/session.c:2044
> #6 0x00005555563ff005 in perf_session__process_events
> (session=0x62b000007200) at util/session.c:2418
> #7 0x000055555616508a in __cmd_report (rep=0x7fffffffbaa0) at
> builtin-report.c:940
> #8 0x000055555616f5c9 in cmd_report (argc=0, argv=0x7fffffffe468) at
> builtin-report.c:1629
> #9 0x00005555562f36b8 in run_builtin (p=0x5555586bacd0
> <commands+240>, argc=5, argv=0x7fffffffe468) at perf.c:313
> #10 0x00005555562f3c11 in handle_internal_command (argc=5,
> argv=0x7fffffffe468) at perf.c:365
> #11 0x00005555562f3fce in run_argv (argcp=0x7fffffffe240,
> argv=0x7fffffffe250) at perf.c:409
> #12 0x00005555562f47bd in main (argc=5, argv=0x7fffffffe468) at perf.c:539
>
> Thanks,
> Ian
>
> > jirka
> >
> > > ff->ph->env.__feat_env = do_read_string(ff); \
> > > return ff->ph->env.__feat_env ? 0 : -ENOMEM; \
> > > }
> > > @@ -4124,6 +4125,7 @@ int perf_event__process_feature(struct perf_session *session,
> > > struct perf_record_header_feature *fe = (struct perf_record_header_feature *)event;
> > > int type = fe->header.type;
> > > u64 feat = fe->feat_id;
> > > + int ret = 0;
> > >
> > > if (type < 0 || type >= PERF_RECORD_HEADER_MAX) {
> > > pr_warning("invalid record type %d in pipe-mode\n", type);
> > > @@ -4141,11 +4143,13 @@ int perf_event__process_feature(struct perf_session *session,
> > > ff.size = event->header.size - sizeof(*fe);
> > > ff.ph = &session->header;
> > >
> > > - if (feat_ops[feat].process(&ff, NULL))
> > > - return -1;
> > > + if (feat_ops[feat].process(&ff, NULL)) {
> > > + ret = -1;
> > > + goto out;
> > > + }
> > >
> > > if (!feat_ops[feat].print || !tool->show_feat_hdr)
> > > - return 0;
> > > + goto out;
> > >
> > > if (!feat_ops[feat].full_only ||
> > > tool->show_feat_hdr >= SHOW_FEAT_HEADER_FULL_INFO) {
> > > @@ -4154,8 +4158,9 @@ int perf_event__process_feature(struct perf_session *session,
> > > fprintf(stdout, "# %s info available, use -I to display\n",
> > > feat_ops[feat].name);
> > > }
> > > -
> > > - return 0;
> > > +out:
> > > + free_event_desc(ff.events);
> > > + return ret;
> > > }
> > >
> > > size_t perf_event__fprintf_event_update(union perf_event *event, FILE *fp)
> > > --
> > > 2.34.0.rc2.393.gf8c9666880-goog
> > >
> >
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-11-30 18:15 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-11-18 20:17 [PATCH] perf header: Fix memory leaks Ian Rogers
2021-11-28 15:46 ` Jiri Olsa
2021-11-29 23:38 ` Ian Rogers
2021-11-30 18:15 ` Jiri Olsa [this message]
2021-11-30 19:22 ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=YaZqN5UQfhBmgznT@krava \
--to=jolsa@redhat.com \
--cc=acme@kernel.org \
--cc=alexander.shishkin@linux.intel.com \
--cc=eranian@google.com \
--cc=irogers@google.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-perf-users@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mark.rutland@arm.com \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=namhyung@kernel.org \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).