From: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@kernel.org>
To: German Gomez <german.gomez@arm.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-perf-users@vger.kernel.org,
Chase Conklin <chase.conklin@arm.com>,
Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>,
Alexander Shishkin <alexander.shishkin@linux.intel.com>,
Jiri Olsa <jolsa@redhat.com>, Namhyung Kim <namhyung@kernel.org>,
Martin KaFai Lau <kafai@fb.com>, Song Liu <songliubraving@fb.com>,
Yonghong Song <yhs@fb.com>,
John Fastabend <john.fastabend@gmail.com>,
KP Singh <kpsingh@kernel.org>, Ian Rogers <irogers@google.com>,
Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@redhat.com>,
Stephane Eranian <eranian@google.com>,
netdev@vger.kernel.org, bpf@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] perf record/arm-spe: Override attr->sample_period for non-libpfm4 events
Date: Sat, 22 Jan 2022 17:15:29 -0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <Yexl4R5qsyi9sEQf@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20220118144054.2541-1-german.gomez@arm.com>
Em Tue, Jan 18, 2022 at 02:40:54PM +0000, German Gomez escreveu:
> A previous patch preventing "attr->sample_period" values from being
> overridden in pfm events changed a related behaviour in arm-spe.
>
> Before said patch:
> perf record -c 10000 -e arm_spe_0// -- sleep 1
>
> Would yield an SPE event with period=10000. After the patch, the period
> in "-c 10000" was being ignored because the arm-spe code initializes
> sample_period to a non-zero value.
>
> This patch restores the previous behaviour for non-libpfm4 events.
>
> Reported-by: Chase Conklin <chase.conklin@arm.com>
> Fixes: ae5dcc8abe31 (“perf record: Prevent override of attr->sample_period for libpfm4 events”)
> Signed-off-by: German Gomez <german.gomez@arm.com>
> ---
> As suggested by Arnaldo, this v2 doesn't include a test in order to not
> block this fix for longer than necessary. So the test can be sent as a
> separate submission later.
Got it, will apply.
> Changes since v1.
> - Update commit message (James Clark)
> ---
> tools/perf/util/evsel.c | 25 +++++++++++++++++--------
> 1 file changed, 17 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/tools/perf/util/evsel.c b/tools/perf/util/evsel.c
> index a59fb2ecb84e..86ab038f020f 100644
> --- a/tools/perf/util/evsel.c
> +++ b/tools/perf/util/evsel.c
> @@ -1065,6 +1065,17 @@ void __weak arch_evsel__fixup_new_cycles(struct perf_event_attr *attr __maybe_un
> {
> }
>
> +static void evsel__set_default_freq_period(struct record_opts *opts,
> + struct perf_event_attr *attr)
> +{
> + if (opts->freq) {
> + attr->freq = 1;
> + attr->sample_freq = opts->freq;
> + } else {
> + attr->sample_period = opts->default_interval;
> + }
> +}
> +
> /*
> * The enable_on_exec/disabled value strategy:
> *
> @@ -1131,14 +1142,12 @@ void evsel__config(struct evsel *evsel, struct record_opts *opts,
> * We default some events to have a default interval. But keep
> * it a weak assumption overridable by the user.
> */
> - if (!attr->sample_period) {
> - if (opts->freq) {
> - attr->freq = 1;
> - attr->sample_freq = opts->freq;
> - } else {
> - attr->sample_period = opts->default_interval;
> - }
> - }
> + if ((evsel->is_libpfm_event && !attr->sample_period) ||
> + (!evsel->is_libpfm_event && (!attr->sample_period ||
> + opts->user_freq != UINT_MAX ||
> + opts->user_interval != ULLONG_MAX)))
> + evsel__set_default_freq_period(opts, attr);
> +
> /*
> * If attr->freq was set (here or earlier), ask for period
> * to be sampled.
> --
> 2.25.1
--
- Arnaldo
prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-01-22 20:17 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-01-18 14:40 [PATCH v2] perf record/arm-spe: Override attr->sample_period for non-libpfm4 events German Gomez
2022-01-22 20:15 ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=Yexl4R5qsyi9sEQf@kernel.org \
--to=acme@kernel.org \
--cc=acme@redhat.com \
--cc=alexander.shishkin@linux.intel.com \
--cc=bpf@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=chase.conklin@arm.com \
--cc=eranian@google.com \
--cc=german.gomez@arm.com \
--cc=irogers@google.com \
--cc=john.fastabend@gmail.com \
--cc=jolsa@redhat.com \
--cc=kafai@fb.com \
--cc=kpsingh@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-perf-users@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mark.rutland@arm.com \
--cc=namhyung@kernel.org \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=songliubraving@fb.com \
--cc=yhs@fb.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).