From: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@kernel.org>
To: Leo Yan <leo.yan@linaro.org>
Cc: John Garry <john.garry@huawei.com>,
peterz@infradead.org, mingo@redhat.com, mark.rutland@arm.com,
jolsa@kernel.org, namhyung@kernel.org, elver@google.com,
dvyukov@google.com, will@kernel.org,
linux-perf-users@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux@armlinux.org.uk,
tmricht@linux.ibm.com, irogers@google.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] perf test: Skip Sigtrap test for arm+aarch64
Date: Fri, 18 Feb 2022 09:56:58 -0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <Yg+Xmt27POS2y2LI@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20220218104611.GD56419@leoy-ThinkPad-X240s>
Em Fri, Feb 18, 2022 at 06:46:11PM +0800, Leo Yan escreveu:
> On Fri, Feb 18, 2022 at 05:33:33PM +0800, John Garry wrote:
> > Skip the Sigtrap test for arm + arm64, same as was done for s390 in
> > commit a840974e96fd ("perf test: Test 73 Sig_trap fails on s390"). For
> > this, reuse BP_SIGNAL_IS_SUPPORTED - meaning that the arch can use BP to
> > generate signals - instead of BP_ACCOUNT_IS_SUPPORTED, which is
> > appropriate.
> >
> > As described by Will at [0], in the test we get stuck in a loop of handling
> > the HW breakpoint exception and never making progress. GDB handles this
> > by stepping over the faulting instruction, but with perf the kernel is
> > expected to handle the step (which it doesn't for arm).
> >
> > Dmitry made an attempt to get this work, also mentioned in the same thread
> > as [0], which was appreciated. But the best thing to do is skip the test
> > for now.
> >
> > [0] https://lore.kernel.org/linux-perf-users/20220118124343.GC98966@leoy-ThinkPad-X240s/T/#m13b06c39d2a5100d340f009435df6f4d8ee57b5a
> >
> > Fixes: Fixes: 5504f67944484 ("perf test sigtrap: Add basic stress test for sigtrap handling")
> > Signed-off-by: John Garry <john.garry@huawei.com>
>
> I tested this patch on my Juno board:
>
> root@Juno:# ./perf test 73
> 73: Sigtrap : Skip
>
> Tested-by: Leo Yan <leo.yan@linaro.org>
Thanks, applied.
- Arnaldo
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-02-18 12:57 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-02-18 9:33 [PATCH v2] perf test: Skip Sigtrap test for arm+aarch64 John Garry
2022-02-18 9:44 ` Marco Elver
2022-02-18 10:46 ` Leo Yan
2022-02-18 12:56 ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo [this message]
2022-02-21 9:52 ` kajoljain
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=Yg+Xmt27POS2y2LI@kernel.org \
--to=acme@kernel.org \
--cc=dvyukov@google.com \
--cc=elver@google.com \
--cc=irogers@google.com \
--cc=john.garry@huawei.com \
--cc=jolsa@kernel.org \
--cc=leo.yan@linaro.org \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-perf-users@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux@armlinux.org.uk \
--cc=mark.rutland@arm.com \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=namhyung@kernel.org \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=tmricht@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=will@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).