linux-perf-users.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@kernel.org>
To: John Garry <john.garry@huawei.com>
Cc: Ian Rogers <irogers@google.com>,
	Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>,
	Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>,
	Alexander Shishkin <alexander.shishkin@linux.intel.com>,
	Jiri Olsa <jolsa@redhat.com>, Namhyung Kim <namhyung@kernel.org>,
	Kajol Jain <kjain@linux.ibm.com>,
	linux-perf-users@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	eranian@google.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3] perf test: Make metric testing more robust.
Date: Tue, 15 Feb 2022 12:10:37 -0300	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <YgvCbTBzVjBBP9/y@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <e078ac0f-6165-9670-926f-d1f2c536ea9e@huawei.com>

Em Fri, Dec 24, 2021 at 08:49:35AM +0000, John Garry escreveu:
> On 23/12/2021 18:56, Ian Rogers wrote:
> > When testing metric expressions we fake counter values from 1 going
> > upward. For some metrics this can yield negative values that are clipped
> > to zero, and then cause divide by zero failures. Such clipping is
> > questionable but may be a result of tools automatically generating
> > metrics. A workaround for this case is to try a second time with counter
> > values going in the opposite direction.
> > 
> > This case was seen in a metric like:
> >    event1 / max(event2 - event3, 0)
> > But it may also happen in more sensible metrics like:
> >    event1 / (event2 + event3 - 1 - event4)
> > 
> > v2. Rebase and more detail in commit message.
> > v3. Is a rebase.
> 
> Incorrect location for this info
> 
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Ian Rogers <irogers@google.com>
> 
> Reviewed-by: John Garry <john.garry@huawei.com>

Found thru the cracks, applying.

- Arnaldo
 
> > ---
> >   tools/perf/tests/pmu-events.c | 32 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++------
> >   1 file changed, 26 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
> > 
> > diff --git a/tools/perf/tests/pmu-events.c b/tools/perf/tests/pmu-events.c
> > index df1c9a3cc05b..b2ddf928d32a 100644
> > --- a/tools/perf/tests/pmu-events.c
> > +++ b/tools/perf/tests/pmu-events.c
> > @@ -962,8 +962,18 @@ static int test__parsing(struct test_suite *test __maybe_unused,
> >   			}
> >   			if (expr__parse(&result, ctx, pe->metric_expr)) {
> > -				expr_failure("Parse failed", map, pe);
> > -				ret++;
> > +				/*
> > +				 * Parsing failed, make numbers go from large to
> > +				 * small which can resolve divide by zero
> 
> can or may?
> 
> > +				 * issues.
> > +				 */
> > +				k = 1024;
> > +				hashmap__for_each_entry(ctx->ids, cur, bkt)
> > +					expr__add_id_val(ctx, strdup(cur->key), k--);
> > +				if (expr__parse(&result, ctx, pe->metric_expr)) {
> > +					expr_failure("Parse failed", map, pe);
> > +					ret++;
> > +				}
> >   			}
> >   		}
> >   	}
> > @@ -1022,10 +1032,20 @@ static int metric_parse_fake(const char *str)
> >   		}
> >   	}
> > -	if (expr__parse(&result, ctx, str))
> > -		pr_err("expr__parse failed\n");
> > -	else
> > -		ret = 0;
> > +	ret = 0;
> > +	if (expr__parse(&result, ctx, str)) {
> > +		/*
> > +		 * Parsing failed, make numbers go from large to small which can
> > +		 * resolve divide by zero issues.
> > +		 */
> > +		i = 1024;
> > +		hashmap__for_each_entry(ctx->ids, cur, bkt)
> > +			expr__add_id_val(ctx, strdup(cur->key), i--);
> > +		if (expr__parse(&result, ctx, str)) {
> > +			pr_err("expr__parse failed\n");
> > +			ret = -1;
> > +		}
> > +	}
> >   out:
> >   	expr__ctx_free(ctx);
> > 

-- 

- Arnaldo

      reply	other threads:[~2022-02-15 15:10 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2021-12-23 18:56 [PATCH v3] perf test: Make metric testing more robust Ian Rogers
2021-12-24  8:49 ` John Garry
2022-02-15 15:10   ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=YgvCbTBzVjBBP9/y@kernel.org \
    --to=acme@kernel.org \
    --cc=alexander.shishkin@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=eranian@google.com \
    --cc=irogers@google.com \
    --cc=john.garry@huawei.com \
    --cc=jolsa@redhat.com \
    --cc=kjain@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-perf-users@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mark.rutland@arm.com \
    --cc=mingo@redhat.com \
    --cc=namhyung@kernel.org \
    --cc=peterz@infradead.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).