From: "Steinar H. Gunderson" <sesse@google.com>
To: Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@intel.com>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>,
Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@kernel.org>,
Alexander Shishkin <alexander.shishkin@linux.intel.com>,
Jiri Olsa <jolsa@redhat.com>, Namhyung Kim <namhyung@kernel.org>,
linux-perf-users@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] perf intel-pt: Synthesize cycle events
Date: Tue, 15 Mar 2022 11:16:26 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <YjBnet2813sEGjZY@google.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <ba2c49da-22c5-06ea-e953-82211b953ca8@intel.com>
On Mon, Mar 14, 2022 at 06:24:19PM +0200, Adrian Hunter wrote:
> Perhaps changing it something like below. What do you think?
I think the structure looks good, but I'm not sure about updating
e.g. ptq->last_cy_insn_cnt in both functions? Does that make sense?
I ran this and found something strange: I've started getting some hits
(very small amounts, e.g. 0.14%) on instructions that are not branches.
How can that happen?
/* Steinar */
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-03-15 10:16 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-03-10 9:38 [PATCH] perf intel-pt: Synthesize cycle events Steinar H. Gunderson
2022-03-11 9:10 ` Adrian Hunter
2022-03-11 17:42 ` Steinar H. Gunderson
2022-03-14 16:24 ` Adrian Hunter
2022-03-15 10:16 ` Steinar H. Gunderson [this message]
2022-03-15 11:32 ` Adrian Hunter
2022-03-15 18:00 ` Steinar H. Gunderson
2022-03-15 20:11 ` Adrian Hunter
2022-03-16 8:19 ` Steinar H. Gunderson
2022-03-16 11:19 ` Adrian Hunter
2022-03-16 12:59 ` Steinar H. Gunderson
2022-03-21 9:16 ` Adrian Hunter
2022-03-21 10:33 ` Steinar H. Gunderson
2022-03-21 13:09 ` Adrian Hunter
2022-03-21 16:58 ` Steinar H. Gunderson
2022-03-21 17:40 ` Adrian Hunter
2022-03-22 11:57 ` Steinar H. Gunderson
2022-03-29 12:31 ` Steinar H. Gunderson
2022-03-29 14:16 ` Steinar H. Gunderson
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=YjBnet2813sEGjZY@google.com \
--to=sesse@google.com \
--cc=acme@kernel.org \
--cc=adrian.hunter@intel.com \
--cc=alexander.shishkin@linux.intel.com \
--cc=jolsa@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-perf-users@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=namhyung@kernel.org \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).