From: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@kernel.org>
To: "Liang, Kan" <kan.liang@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Ian Rogers <irogers@google.com>,
Zhengjun Xing <zhengjun.xing@linux.intel.com>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>,
Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>,
Alexander Shishkin <alexander.shishkin@linux.intel.com>,
Jiri Olsa <jolsa@redhat.com>, Namhyung Kim <namhyung@kernel.org>,
Maxime Coquelin <mcoquelin.stm32@gmail.com>,
Alexandre Torgue <alexandre.torgue@foss.st.com>,
Andi Kleen <ak@linux.intel.com>,
James Clark <james.clark@arm.com>,
John Garry <john.garry@huawei.com>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-perf-users@vger.kernel.org,
Stephane Eranian <eranian@google.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] perf parse-events: Move slots only with topdown
Date: Tue, 22 Mar 2022 17:53:55 -0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <Yjo3Y+zLljKU1lVO@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <ffd440b7-fef9-a5ae-95b7-73c1f8a212ef@linux.intel.com>
Em Tue, Mar 22, 2022 at 07:48:48AM -0400, Liang, Kan escreveu:
> On 3/21/2022 6:33 PM, Ian Rogers wrote:
> > If slots isn't with a topdown event then moving it is unnecessary. For
> > example {instructions, slots} is re-ordered:
> >
> > $ perf stat -e '{instructions,slots}' -a sleep 1
> >
> > Performance counter stats for 'system wide':
> >
> > 936,600,825 slots
> > 144,440,968 instructions
> >
> > 1.006061423 seconds time elapsed
> >
> > Which can break tools expecting the command line order to match the
> > printed order. It is necessary to move the slots event first when it
> > appears with topdown events. Add extra checking so that the slots event
> > is only moved in the case of there being a topdown event like:
> >
> > $ perf stat -e '{instructions,slots,topdown-fe-bound}' -a sleep 1
> >
> > Performance counter stats for 'system wide':
> >
> > 2427568570 slots
> > 300927614 instructions
> > 551021649 topdown-fe-bound
> >
> > 1.001771803 seconds time elapsed
> >
> > Fixes: 94dbfd6781a0 ("perf parse-events: Architecture specific leader override")
> > Reported-by: Kan Liang <kan.liang@linux.intel.com>
> > Signed-off-by: Ian Rogers <irogers@google.com>
>
> Thanks Ian. The patch works well.
>
> Tested-by: Kan Liang <kan.liang@linux.intel.com>
Thanks, applied.
- Arnaldo
prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-03-22 20:54 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-03-21 22:33 [PATCH] perf parse-events: Move slots only with topdown Ian Rogers
2022-03-22 11:48 ` Liang, Kan
2022-03-22 20:53 ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=Yjo3Y+zLljKU1lVO@kernel.org \
--to=acme@kernel.org \
--cc=ak@linux.intel.com \
--cc=alexander.shishkin@linux.intel.com \
--cc=alexandre.torgue@foss.st.com \
--cc=eranian@google.com \
--cc=irogers@google.com \
--cc=james.clark@arm.com \
--cc=john.garry@huawei.com \
--cc=jolsa@redhat.com \
--cc=kan.liang@linux.intel.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-perf-users@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mark.rutland@arm.com \
--cc=mcoquelin.stm32@gmail.com \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=namhyung@kernel.org \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=zhengjun.xing@linux.intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).