From: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@kernel.org>
To: Ian Rogers <irogers@google.com>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>,
Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>,
Alexander Shishkin <alexander.shishkin@linux.intel.com>,
Jiri Olsa <jolsa@kernel.org>, Namhyung Kim <namhyung@kernel.org>,
Mathieu Poirier <mathieu.poirier@linaro.org>,
Suzuki K Poulose <suzuki.poulose@arm.com>,
Mike Leach <mike.leach@linaro.org>, Leo Yan <leo.yan@linaro.org>,
John Garry <john.garry@huawei.com>, Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>,
Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>,
Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>,
Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>,
Martin KaFai Lau <kafai@fb.com>, Song Liu <songliubraving@fb.com>,
Yonghong Song <yhs@fb.com>,
John Fastabend <john.fastabend@gmail.com>,
KP Singh <kpsingh@kernel.org>, Kajol Jain <kjain@linux.ibm.com>,
James Clark <james.clark@arm.com>,
German Gomez <german.gomez@arm.com>,
Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@intel.com>,
Riccardo Mancini <rickyman7@gmail.com>,
Andi Kleen <ak@linux.intel.com>,
Alexey Bayduraev <alexey.v.bayduraev@linux.intel.com>,
Alexander Antonov <alexander.antonov@linux.intel.com>,
linux-perf-users@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
coresight@lists.linaro.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
netdev@vger.kernel.org, bpf@vger.kernel.org,
Stephane Eranian <eranian@google.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/5] perf cpumap: Add intersect function.
Date: Mon, 28 Mar 2022 17:28:18 -0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <YkIaYq2alnNUiIfr@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20220328062414.1893550-4-irogers@google.com>
Em Sun, Mar 27, 2022 at 11:24:12PM -0700, Ian Rogers escreveu:
> The merge function gives the union of two cpu maps. Add an intersect
> function which will be used in the next change.
>
> Signed-off-by: Ian Rogers <irogers@google.com>
> ---
> tools/lib/perf/cpumap.c | 38 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> tools/lib/perf/include/perf/cpumap.h | 2 ++
> 2 files changed, 40 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/tools/lib/perf/cpumap.c b/tools/lib/perf/cpumap.c
> index 953bc50b0e41..56b4d213039f 100644
> --- a/tools/lib/perf/cpumap.c
> +++ b/tools/lib/perf/cpumap.c
> @@ -393,3 +393,41 @@ struct perf_cpu_map *perf_cpu_map__merge(struct perf_cpu_map *orig,
> perf_cpu_map__put(orig);
> return merged;
> }
> +
> +struct perf_cpu_map *perf_cpu_map__intersect(struct perf_cpu_map *orig,
> + struct perf_cpu_map *other)
> +{
> + struct perf_cpu *tmp_cpus;
> + int tmp_len;
> + int i, j, k;
> + struct perf_cpu_map *merged = NULL;
> +
> + if (perf_cpu_map__is_subset(other, orig))
> + return orig;
> + if (perf_cpu_map__is_subset(orig, other)) {
> + perf_cpu_map__put(orig);
Why this put(orig)?
> + return perf_cpu_map__get(other);
And why the get here and not on the first if?
> + }
> +
> + tmp_len = max(orig->nr, other->nr);
> + tmp_cpus = malloc(tmp_len * sizeof(struct perf_cpu));
> + if (!tmp_cpus)
> + return NULL;
> +
> + i = j = k = 0;
> + while (i < orig->nr && j < other->nr) {
> + if (orig->map[i].cpu < other->map[j].cpu)
> + i++;
> + else if (orig->map[i].cpu > other->map[j].cpu)
> + j++;
> + else {
> + j++;
> + tmp_cpus[k++] = orig->map[i++];
> + }
> + }
> + if (k)
> + merged = cpu_map__trim_new(k, tmp_cpus);
> + free(tmp_cpus);
> + perf_cpu_map__put(orig);
> + return merged;
> +}
> diff --git a/tools/lib/perf/include/perf/cpumap.h b/tools/lib/perf/include/perf/cpumap.h
> index 4a2edbdb5e2b..a2a7216c0b78 100644
> --- a/tools/lib/perf/include/perf/cpumap.h
> +++ b/tools/lib/perf/include/perf/cpumap.h
> @@ -19,6 +19,8 @@ LIBPERF_API struct perf_cpu_map *perf_cpu_map__read(FILE *file);
> LIBPERF_API struct perf_cpu_map *perf_cpu_map__get(struct perf_cpu_map *map);
> LIBPERF_API struct perf_cpu_map *perf_cpu_map__merge(struct perf_cpu_map *orig,
> struct perf_cpu_map *other);
> +LIBPERF_API struct perf_cpu_map *perf_cpu_map__intersect(struct perf_cpu_map *orig,
> + struct perf_cpu_map *other);
> LIBPERF_API void perf_cpu_map__put(struct perf_cpu_map *map);
> LIBPERF_API struct perf_cpu perf_cpu_map__cpu(const struct perf_cpu_map *cpus, int idx);
> LIBPERF_API int perf_cpu_map__nr(const struct perf_cpu_map *cpus);
> --
> 2.35.1.1021.g381101b075-goog
--
- Arnaldo
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-03-28 20:28 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-03-28 6:24 [PATCH 0/5] Make evlist CPUs more accurate Ian Rogers
2022-03-28 6:24 ` [PATCH 1/5] perf evlist: Rename cpus to user_cpus Ian Rogers
2022-03-28 20:18 ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2022-03-28 20:58 ` Ian Rogers
2022-03-28 6:24 ` [PATCH 2/5] perf cpumap: More cpu map reuse by merge Ian Rogers
2022-03-28 20:26 ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2022-03-28 20:50 ` Ian Rogers
2022-03-28 20:56 ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2022-03-28 6:24 ` [PATCH 3/5] perf cpumap: Add intersect function Ian Rogers
2022-03-28 20:28 ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo [this message]
2022-03-28 20:54 ` Ian Rogers
2022-03-28 20:59 ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2022-03-28 21:25 ` Ian Rogers
2022-03-28 6:24 ` [PATCH 4/5] perf stat: Avoid segv if core.user_cpus isn't set Ian Rogers
2022-03-28 20:32 ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2022-03-28 20:46 ` Ian Rogers
2022-03-28 6:24 ` [PATCH 5/5] perf evlist: Respect all_cpus when setting user_cpus Ian Rogers
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=YkIaYq2alnNUiIfr@kernel.org \
--to=acme@kernel.org \
--cc=adrian.hunter@intel.com \
--cc=ak@linux.intel.com \
--cc=alexander.antonov@linux.intel.com \
--cc=alexander.shishkin@linux.intel.com \
--cc=alexey.v.bayduraev@linux.intel.com \
--cc=andrii@kernel.org \
--cc=ast@kernel.org \
--cc=bpf@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=coresight@lists.linaro.org \
--cc=daniel@iogearbox.net \
--cc=eranian@google.com \
--cc=german.gomez@arm.com \
--cc=irogers@google.com \
--cc=james.clark@arm.com \
--cc=john.fastabend@gmail.com \
--cc=john.garry@huawei.com \
--cc=jolsa@kernel.org \
--cc=kafai@fb.com \
--cc=kjain@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=kpsingh@kernel.org \
--cc=leo.yan@linaro.org \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-perf-users@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mark.rutland@arm.com \
--cc=mathieu.poirier@linaro.org \
--cc=mike.leach@linaro.org \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=namhyung@kernel.org \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=rickyman7@gmail.com \
--cc=songliubraving@fb.com \
--cc=suzuki.poulose@arm.com \
--cc=will@kernel.org \
--cc=yhs@fb.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).