From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BD5AEC433F5 for ; Sat, 9 Apr 2022 15:28:10 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S232403AbiDIPaO (ORCPT ); Sat, 9 Apr 2022 11:30:14 -0400 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:55148 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S230366AbiDIPaN (ORCPT ); Sat, 9 Apr 2022 11:30:13 -0400 Received: from ams.source.kernel.org (ams.source.kernel.org [IPv6:2604:1380:4601:e00::1]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 50CA4217384; Sat, 9 Apr 2022 08:28:06 -0700 (PDT) Received: from smtp.kernel.org (relay.kernel.org [52.25.139.140]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ams.source.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 068A9B80836; Sat, 9 Apr 2022 15:28:05 +0000 (UTC) Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 6D93EC385A5; Sat, 9 Apr 2022 15:28:03 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=k20201202; t=1649518083; bh=fH6R5XI0+0MFwVlPvp4WGTQEHHbOqX/unKqNw5JN0fo=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:References:In-Reply-To:From; b=XuZzvDcjwzt33GApdo4mT8wyKTeHEbtZzEUxNitkFJbRjt9HdqKu72e8XXr4+P5ro HbzPfDVzTHfF9mh2gk45gdBJ6BoMTMP8mN7MBQN5WQpoA6HqXYKpMahvWYhVR9q3YZ uzUuAmPT+PuPzmevLpFjaBgCjyBsRdAPPzKV9+nlBv10EDD1OQJS+rkyUEZYcRNi8U spOkAiXFKcHxLmdX4ALNmYs7FLKveYOh88TRGVraNYFRWwTPd4zbGngas6OSmyEPA1 Lwjc4z6nD0SOxycooll8D9EV9ROi+bh/eDUcdBwMS3p3KuOgLsoe3349dTevmxmkTy ERRcuypNQIinA== Received: by quaco.ghostprotocols.net (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 0E06F40407; Sat, 9 Apr 2022 12:28:01 -0300 (-03) Date: Sat, 9 Apr 2022 12:28:01 -0300 From: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo To: Athira Rajeev Cc: jolsa@kernel.org, disgoel@linux.vnet.ibm.com, mpe@ellerman.id.au, linux-perf-users@vger.kernel.org, linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org, maddy@linux.vnet.ibm.com, rnsastry@linux.ibm.com, kjain@linux.ibm.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, srikar@linux.vnet.ibm.com, irogers@google.com Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 0/4] Fix perf bench numa, futex and epoll to work with machines having #CPUs > 1K Message-ID: References: <20220406175113.87881-1-atrajeev@linux.vnet.ibm.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20220406175113.87881-1-atrajeev@linux.vnet.ibm.com> X-Url: http://acmel.wordpress.com Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-perf-users@vger.kernel.org Em Wed, Apr 06, 2022 at 11:21:09PM +0530, Athira Rajeev escreveu: > The perf benchmark for collections: numa, futex and epoll > hits failure in system configuration with CPU's more than 1024. > These benchmarks uses "sched_getaffinity" and "sched_setaffinity" > in the code to work with affinity. Applied 1-3, 4 needs some reworking and can wait for v5.19, the first 3 are fixes, so can go now. - Arnaldo