From: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@kernel.org>
To: Jiri Olsa <olsajiri@gmail.com>
Cc: Thomas Richter <tmricht@linux.ibm.com>,
"linux-perf-use." <linux-perf-users@vger.kernel.org>,
Jiri Olsa <jolsa@redhat.com>,
Sumanth Korikkar <sumanthk@linux.ibm.com>,
Heiko Carstens <hca@linux.ibm.com>,
vasily Gorbik <gor@linux.ibm.com>,
Ian Rogers <irogers@google.com>,
Ilya Leoshkevich <iii@linux.ibm.com>,
Sven Schnelle <svens@linux.ibm.com>
Subject: Re: perf test case 40 LLVM search and compile runs endless (eBPF linkage issue)
Date: Tue, 24 May 2022 11:33:35 -0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <Yozsvxx0JsTbVgW1@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <YozLKby7ITEtchC9@krava>
Em Tue, May 24, 2022 at 02:10:17PM +0200, Jiri Olsa escreveu:
> On Mon, May 23, 2022 at 01:09:51PM +0200, Jiri Olsa wrote:
> > On Mon, May 23, 2022 at 12:52:06PM +0200, Thomas Richter wrote:
> > > On s390 the test case 40 'LLVM search and compile' runs for ever:
> > >
> > > # date; timeout 30s perf test -F 40; date
> > > Mon May 23 12:35:48 PM CEST 2022
> > > 40: LLVM search and compile :
> > > 40.1: Basic BPF llvm compile :
> > > Mon May 23 12:36:18 PM CEST 2022
> > > #
> > >
> > > Investigation by Ilya Leoshkevich revealed:
> > > On s390 we hit an endless loop where bpf_object__next_program and bpf_program__next
> > > infinitely call each other. We tracked this down to ld.so preferring the perf's
> > > bpf_object__next_program weak copy over the libbpf's strong one.
> > >
> > > This is introduced with commit 2a4898fc264a ("perf tools: Add more weak libbpf functions")
> > >
> > > Also see discussion in
> > > https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/YY%2FAR2Dcaws0BAE9@kernel.org/
> > >
> > > How can this be fixed asap? Thanks a lot.
> >
> > I was just suggesting to remove that:
> > https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/Yos8hq3NmBwemoJw@krava/T/#mda8abccbf475b99d25abe5498a5df1af2da82ee8
> >
> > it's no longer needed and can cause problem apparently
>
> after discussing with Arnaldo we decided to go for another fix,
> could you please try this branch:
>
> git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/jolsa/perf.git
> perf/weak
I'm adding comments, testing and applying that series in my local tree,
so far so good, will push to tmp.perf/core later.
Please let us know if you guys looked at the patches in Jiri's perf/weak
branch and if you are ok with it so that I can add
Tested-by/acked-by/reviewed-by, which are always more than welcome.
Thanks,
- Arnaldo
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-05-24 14:33 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-05-23 10:52 perf test case 40 LLVM search and compile runs endless (eBPF linkage issue) Thomas Richter
2022-05-23 11:09 ` Jiri Olsa
2022-05-24 12:10 ` Jiri Olsa
2022-05-24 14:33 ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo [this message]
2022-05-25 14:10 ` Thomas Richter
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=Yozsvxx0JsTbVgW1@kernel.org \
--to=acme@kernel.org \
--cc=gor@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=hca@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=iii@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=irogers@google.com \
--cc=jolsa@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-perf-users@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=olsajiri@gmail.com \
--cc=sumanthk@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=svens@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=tmricht@linux.ibm.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).