From: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@kernel.org>
To: Namhyung Kim <namhyung@kernel.org>
Cc: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@kernel.org>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Ian Rogers <irogers@google.com>,
linux-perf-users@vger.kernel.org, Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>,
Waiman Long <longman@redhat.com>,
Boqun Feng <boqun.feng@gmail.com>,
Davidlohr Bueso <dave@stgolabs.net>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/5] perf lock: Add flags field in the lock_stat
Date: Mon, 25 Jul 2022 17:53:46 -0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <Yt8C2kuSAJM5LJZf@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20220725183124.368304-2-namhyung@kernel.org>
Em Mon, Jul 25, 2022 at 11:31:20AM -0700, Namhyung Kim escreveu:
> For lock contention tracepoint analysis, it needs to keep the flags.
> As nr_readlock and nr_trylock fields are not used for it, let's make
> it a union.
>
> Signed-off-by: Namhyung Kim <namhyung@kernel.org>
> ---
> tools/perf/builtin-lock.c | 22 +++++++++++++---------
> 1 file changed, 13 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/tools/perf/builtin-lock.c b/tools/perf/builtin-lock.c
> index 0aae88fdf93a..1de459198b99 100644
> --- a/tools/perf/builtin-lock.c
> +++ b/tools/perf/builtin-lock.c
> @@ -59,7 +59,10 @@ struct lock_stat {
> unsigned int nr_contended;
> unsigned int nr_release;
>
> - unsigned int nr_readlock;
> + union {
> + unsigned int nr_readlock;
> + unsigned int flags;
> + };
> unsigned int nr_trylock;
>
> /* these times are in nano sec. */
> @@ -516,7 +519,7 @@ static struct lock_stat *lock_stat_find(u64 addr)
> return NULL;
> }
>
> -static struct lock_stat *lock_stat_findnew(u64 addr, const char *name)
> +static struct lock_stat *lock_stat_findnew(u64 addr, const char *name, int flags)
> {
> struct hlist_head *entry = lockhashentry(addr);
> struct lock_stat *ret, *new;
> @@ -531,13 +534,13 @@ static struct lock_stat *lock_stat_findnew(u64 addr, const char *name)
> goto alloc_failed;
>
> new->addr = addr;
> - new->name = zalloc(sizeof(char) * strlen(name) + 1);
> + new->name = strdup(name);
> if (!new->name) {
> free(new);
> goto alloc_failed;
> }
>
> - strcpy(new->name, name);
I'm applying to speed things up, but please separate such unrelated bits
in another patch next time.
- Arnaldo
> + new->flags = flags;
> new->wait_time_min = ULLONG_MAX;
>
> hlist_add_head(&new->hash_entry, entry);
> @@ -624,7 +627,7 @@ static int report_lock_acquire_event(struct evsel *evsel,
> if (show_thread_stats)
> addr = sample->tid;
>
> - ls = lock_stat_findnew(addr, name);
> + ls = lock_stat_findnew(addr, name, 0);
> if (!ls)
> return -ENOMEM;
>
> @@ -696,7 +699,7 @@ static int report_lock_acquired_event(struct evsel *evsel,
> if (show_thread_stats)
> addr = sample->tid;
>
> - ls = lock_stat_findnew(addr, name);
> + ls = lock_stat_findnew(addr, name, 0);
> if (!ls)
> return -ENOMEM;
>
> @@ -758,7 +761,7 @@ static int report_lock_contended_event(struct evsel *evsel,
> if (show_thread_stats)
> addr = sample->tid;
>
> - ls = lock_stat_findnew(addr, name);
> + ls = lock_stat_findnew(addr, name, 0);
> if (!ls)
> return -ENOMEM;
>
> @@ -813,7 +816,7 @@ static int report_lock_release_event(struct evsel *evsel,
> if (show_thread_stats)
> addr = sample->tid;
>
> - ls = lock_stat_findnew(addr, name);
> + ls = lock_stat_findnew(addr, name, 0);
> if (!ls)
> return -ENOMEM;
>
> @@ -985,11 +988,12 @@ static int report_lock_contention_begin_event(struct evsel *evsel,
> if (!ls) {
> char buf[128];
> const char *caller = buf;
> + unsigned int flags = evsel__intval(evsel, sample, "flags");
>
> if (lock_contention_caller(evsel, sample, buf, sizeof(buf)) < 0)
> caller = "Unknown";
>
> - ls = lock_stat_findnew(addr, caller);
> + ls = lock_stat_findnew(addr, caller, flags);
> if (!ls)
> return -ENOMEM;
> }
> --
> 2.37.1.359.gd136c6c3e2-goog
--
- Arnaldo
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-07-25 20:53 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-07-25 18:31 [PATCHSET 0/5] perf lock: Add contention subcommand (v2) Namhyung Kim
2022-07-25 18:31 ` [PATCH 1/5] perf lock: Add flags field in the lock_stat Namhyung Kim
2022-07-25 20:53 ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo [this message]
2022-07-25 18:31 ` [PATCH 2/5] perf lock: Add lock aggregation enum Namhyung Kim
2022-07-25 18:31 ` [PATCH 3/5] perf lock: Add 'contention' subcommand Namhyung Kim
2022-07-25 18:31 ` [PATCH 4/5] perf lock: Add -k and -F options to " Namhyung Kim
2022-07-25 18:31 ` [PATCH 5/5] perf lock: Support -t option for " Namhyung Kim
2022-07-25 21:01 ` [PATCHSET 0/5] perf lock: Add contention subcommand (v2) Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=Yt8C2kuSAJM5LJZf@kernel.org \
--to=acme@kernel.org \
--cc=boqun.feng@gmail.com \
--cc=dave@stgolabs.net \
--cc=irogers@google.com \
--cc=jolsa@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-perf-users@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=longman@redhat.com \
--cc=mingo@kernel.org \
--cc=namhyung@kernel.org \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=will@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).