linux-perf-users.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@kernel.org>
To: Namhyung Kim <namhyung@kernel.org>
Cc: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@kernel.org>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>,
	Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
	LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	Ian Rogers <irogers@google.com>,
	linux-perf-users@vger.kernel.org, Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>,
	Waiman Long <longman@redhat.com>,
	Boqun Feng <boqun.feng@gmail.com>,
	Davidlohr Bueso <dave@stgolabs.net>,
	Stephane Eranian <eranian@google.com>,
	Blake Jones <blakejones@google.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/3] perf lock contention: Add BPF support (v1)
Date: Mon, 1 Aug 2022 09:29:26 -0300	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <YufHJpDvhsYg3btG@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20220729200756.666106-1-namhyung@kernel.org>

Em Fri, Jul 29, 2022 at 01:07:53PM -0700, Namhyung Kim escreveu:
> Hello,
> 
> This patchset adds -b/--use-bpf option and others to use BPF to
> collect kernel lock contention stats.  With this option it doesn't
> require a separate `perf lock record` step.  Basic filtering on cpu
> (with -a or -C option) and on task (with -p and --tid option) is
> supported as usual.
> 
>   $ sudo perf lock con -a -b sleep 1
>      contended   total wait     max wait     avg wait         type   caller
> 
>             42    192.67 us     13.64 us      4.59 us     spinlock   queue_work_on+0x20
>             23     85.54 us     10.28 us      3.72 us     spinlock   worker_thread+0x14a
>              6     13.92 us      6.51 us      2.32 us        mutex   kernfs_iop_permission+0x30
>              3     11.59 us     10.04 us      3.86 us        mutex   kernfs_dop_revalidate+0x3c
>              1      7.52 us      7.52 us      7.52 us     spinlock   kthread+0x115
>              1      7.24 us      7.24 us      7.24 us     rwlock:W   sys_epoll_wait+0x148
>              2      7.08 us      3.99 us      3.54 us     spinlock   delayed_work_timer_fn+0x1b
>              1      6.41 us      6.41 us      6.41 us     spinlock   idle_balance+0xa06
>              2      2.50 us      1.83 us      1.25 us        mutex   kernfs_iop_lookup+0x2f
>              1      1.71 us      1.71 us      1.71 us        mutex   kernfs_iop_getattr+0x2c
> 
> It seems my system had some contentions on the workqueue spinlock and
> the kernfs mutex.
> 
> The code is available at perf/lock-bpf-v1 branch in
> 
>   git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/namhyung/linux-perf.git

Thanks, applied.

- Arnaldo

 
> Thanks,
> Namhyung
> 
> 
> Namhyung Kim (3):
>   perf lock: Pass machine pointer to is_lock_function()
>   perf lock: Use BPF for lock contention analysis
>   perf lock: Implement cpu and task filters for BPF
> 
>  tools/perf/Documentation/perf-lock.txt        |  22 ++
>  tools/perf/Makefile.perf                      |   2 +-
>  tools/perf/builtin-lock.c                     | 226 ++++++++----------
>  tools/perf/util/Build                         |   1 +
>  tools/perf/util/bpf_lock_contention.c         | 181 ++++++++++++++
>  .../perf/util/bpf_skel/lock_contention.bpf.c  | 170 +++++++++++++
>  tools/perf/util/lock-contention.h             | 140 +++++++++++
>  7 files changed, 614 insertions(+), 128 deletions(-)
>  create mode 100644 tools/perf/util/bpf_lock_contention.c
>  create mode 100644 tools/perf/util/bpf_skel/lock_contention.bpf.c
>  create mode 100644 tools/perf/util/lock-contention.h
> 
> -- 
> 2.37.1.455.g008518b4e5-goog

-- 

- Arnaldo

      parent reply	other threads:[~2022-08-01 12:44 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2022-07-29 20:07 [PATCH 0/3] perf lock contention: Add BPF support (v1) Namhyung Kim
2022-07-29 20:07 ` [PATCH 1/3] perf lock: Pass machine pointer to is_lock_function() Namhyung Kim
2022-07-29 20:07 ` [PATCH 2/3] perf lock: Use BPF for lock contention analysis Namhyung Kim
2022-07-29 20:07 ` [PATCH 3/3] perf lock: Implement cpu and task filters for BPF Namhyung Kim
2022-08-01 12:29 ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=YufHJpDvhsYg3btG@kernel.org \
    --to=acme@kernel.org \
    --cc=blakejones@google.com \
    --cc=boqun.feng@gmail.com \
    --cc=dave@stgolabs.net \
    --cc=eranian@google.com \
    --cc=irogers@google.com \
    --cc=jolsa@kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-perf-users@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=longman@redhat.com \
    --cc=mingo@kernel.org \
    --cc=namhyung@kernel.org \
    --cc=peterz@infradead.org \
    --cc=will@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).