linux-perf-users.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Sean Christopherson <seanjc@google.com>
To: Like Xu <like.xu.linux@gmail.com>
Cc: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>,
	Alexander Shishkin <alexander.shishkin@linux.intel.com>,
	Jiri Olsa <jolsa@kernel.org>, Namhyung Kim <namhyung@kernel.org>,
	linux-perf-users@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	kvm@vger.kernel.org, Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>,
	Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
	Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@kernel.org>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 7/7] KVM: VMX: Simplify capability check when handling PERF_CAPABILITIES write
Date: Thu, 4 Aug 2022 15:00:45 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <YuvfHZLGbU08S4ee@google.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <41e0b2a0-c53d-870f-d619-4008eb222d42@gmail.com>

On Thu, Aug 04, 2022, Like Xu wrote:
> On 4/8/2022 3:26 am, Sean Christopherson wrote:
> > Explicitly check for the absence of host support for LBRs or PEBS when
> > userspace attempts to enable said features by writing PERF_CAPABILITIES.
> > Comparing host support against the incoming value is unnecessary and
> > weird since the checks are buried inside an if-statement that verifies
> > userspace wants to enable the feature.
> 
> If you mean this part in the KVM:
> 
> 	case MSR_IA32_PERF_CAPABILITIES: {
> 		...
> 		if (data & ~msr_ent.data)
> 			return 1;
> 		...
> 
> then this patch brings a flaw, for example:
> 
> a user space can successfully set 0x1 on a host that reports a value of 0x5,
> which should not happen since the semantics of 0x1 and 0x5 for LBR_FMT
> may be completely different from the guest LBR driver's perspective.

/facepalm

I keep forgetting the caps need to match the host exactly.  Thanks!

      reply	other threads:[~2022-08-04 15:00 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2022-08-03 19:26 [PATCH v2 0/7] KVM: x86: Intel PERF_CAPABILITIES fixes and cleanups Sean Christopherson
2022-08-03 19:26 ` [PATCH v2 1/7] KVM: x86: Refresh PMU after writes to MSR_IA32_PERF_CAPABILITIES Sean Christopherson
2022-08-03 19:26 ` [PATCH v2 2/7] perf/x86/core: Remove unnecessary stubs provided for KVM-only helpers Sean Christopherson
2022-08-04  8:49   ` Like Xu
2022-08-04 15:07     ` Sean Christopherson
2022-08-03 19:26 ` [PATCH v2 3/7] perf/x86/core: Drop the unnecessary return value from x86_perf_get_lbr() Sean Christopherson
2022-08-03 19:26 ` [PATCH v2 4/7] KVM: VMX: Advertise PMU LBRs if and only if perf supports LBRs Sean Christopherson
2022-08-03 19:26 ` [PATCH v2 5/7] KVM: VMX: Use proper type-safe functions for vCPU => LBRs helpers Sean Christopherson
2022-08-03 19:26 ` [PATCH v2 6/7] KVM: VMX: Adjust number of LBR records for PERF_CAPABILITIES at refresh Sean Christopherson
2022-08-03 19:26 ` [PATCH v2 7/7] KVM: VMX: Simplify capability check when handling PERF_CAPABILITIES write Sean Christopherson
2022-08-04  7:52   ` Like Xu
2022-08-04 15:00     ` Sean Christopherson [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=YuvfHZLGbU08S4ee@google.com \
    --to=seanjc@google.com \
    --cc=acme@kernel.org \
    --cc=alexander.shishkin@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=jolsa@kernel.org \
    --cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=like.xu.linux@gmail.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-perf-users@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mark.rutland@arm.com \
    --cc=mingo@redhat.com \
    --cc=namhyung@kernel.org \
    --cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
    --cc=peterz@infradead.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).