linux-perf-users.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@kernel.org>
To: Quentin Monnet <quentin@isovalent.com>
Cc: Roberto Sassu <roberto.sassu@huaweicloud.com>,
	peterz@infradead.org, mingo@redhat.com, mark.rutland@arm.com,
	alexander.shishkin@linux.intel.com, jolsa@kernel.org,
	namhyung@kernel.org, linux-perf-users@vger.kernel.org,
	bpf@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	Roberto Sassu <roberto.sassu@huawei.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/3] tools/build: Display logical OR of a feature flavors
Date: Thu, 18 Aug 2022 15:14:00 -0300	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <Yv6BaHgC4E4J0TTT@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <23da162e-1018-9bfa-bc5c-ec09eba9428b@isovalent.com>

Em Thu, Aug 18, 2022 at 05:40:04PM +0100, Quentin Monnet escreveu:
> On 18/08/2022 14:25, Roberto Sassu wrote:
> > On Thu, 2022-08-18 at 10:09 -0300, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo wrote:
> >> Em Thu, Aug 18, 2022 at 02:09:57PM +0200, 
> >> roberto.sassu@huaweicloud.com escreveu:
> >>> From: Roberto Sassu <roberto.sassu@huawei.com>
> >>>
> >>> Sometimes, features are simply different flavors of another
> >>> feature, to
> >>> properly detect the exact dependencies needed by different Linux
> >>> distributions.
> >>>
> >>> For example, libbfd has three flavors: libbfd if the distro does
> >>> not
> >>> require any additional dependency; libbfd-liberty if it requires
> >>> libiberty;
> >>> libbfd-liberty-z if it requires libiberty and libz.
> >>>
> >>> It might not be clear to the user whether a feature has been
> >>> successfully
> >>> detected or not, given that some of its flavors will be set to OFF,
> >>> others
> >>> to ON.
> >>>
> >>> Instead, display only the feature main flavor if not in verbose
> >>> mode
> >>> (VF != 1), and set it to ON if at least one of its flavors has been
> >>> successfully detected (logical OR), OFF otherwise. Omit the other
> >>> flavors.
> >>>
> >>> Accomplish that by declaring a FEATURE_GROUP_MEMBERS-<feature main
> >>> flavor>
> >>> variable, with the list of the other flavors as variable value. For
> >>> now, do
> >>> it just for libbfd.
> >>>
> >>> In verbose mode, of if no group is defined for a feature, show the
> >>> feature
> >>> detection result as before.
> >>
> >> Looks cool, tested and added this to the commit log message here in
> >> my
> >> local branch, that will go public after further tests for the other
> >> csets in it:
> >>
> >> Committer testing:
> >>
> >> Collecting the output from:
> >>
> >>   $ make -C tools/bpf/bpftool/ clean
> >>   $ make -C tools/bpf/bpftool/ |& grep "Auto-detecting system
> >> features" -A10
> >>
> >>   $ diff -u before after
> >>   --- before    2022-08-18 10:06:40.422086966 -0300
> >>   +++ after     2022-08-18 10:07:59.202138282 -0300
> >>   @@ -1,6 +1,4 @@
> >>    Auto-detecting system features:
> >>    ...                                  libbfd: [ on  ]
> >>   -...                          libbfd-liberty: [ on  ]
> >>   -...                        libbfd-liberty-z: [ on  ]
> >>    ...                                  libcap: [ on  ]
> >>    ...                         clang-bpf-co-re: [ on  ]
> >>   $
> >>
> >> Tested-by: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@redhat.com>
> >>
> >> Thanks for working on this!
> > 
> > Thanks for testing and for adapting/pushing the other patches!
> > 
> > Roberto
> > 
> 
> Tested locally for bpftool and I also observe "libbfd: [ on  ]" only.
> This looks much better, thank you Roberto for following up on this!

So I'll add your Tested-by: to this one as well, maybe to all the
patches in this series?

- Arnaldo

  reply	other threads:[~2022-08-18 18:14 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2022-08-18 12:09 [PATCH 1/3] tools/build: Fix feature detection output due to eval expansion roberto.sassu
2022-08-18 12:09 ` [PATCH 2/3] tools/build: Increment room for feature name in feature detection output roberto.sassu
2022-08-18 12:09 ` [PATCH 3/3] tools/build: Display logical OR of a feature flavors roberto.sassu
2022-08-18 13:09   ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2022-08-18 13:25     ` Roberto Sassu
2022-08-18 16:40       ` Quentin Monnet
2022-08-18 18:14         ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo [this message]
2022-08-18 22:15           ` Quentin Monnet
2022-08-22 10:58   ` Jiri Olsa
2022-08-22 11:24     ` Roberto Sassu
2022-09-27  7:14       ` Roberto Sassu
2022-09-27 12:21         ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2022-09-27 12:25           ` Roberto Sassu
2022-09-27 13:24           ` Quentin Monnet

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=Yv6BaHgC4E4J0TTT@kernel.org \
    --to=acme@kernel.org \
    --cc=alexander.shishkin@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=bpf@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=jolsa@kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-perf-users@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mark.rutland@arm.com \
    --cc=mingo@redhat.com \
    --cc=namhyung@kernel.org \
    --cc=peterz@infradead.org \
    --cc=quentin@isovalent.com \
    --cc=roberto.sassu@huawei.com \
    --cc=roberto.sassu@huaweicloud.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).