From: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@kernel.org>
To: Zixuan Tan <tanzixuan.me@gmail.com>
Cc: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <arnaldo.melo@gmail.com>,
Namhyung Kim <namhyung@kernel.org>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>,
Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>,
Alexander Shishkin <alexander.shishkin@linux.intel.com>,
Jiri Olsa <jolsa@kernel.org>,
linux-perf-users <linux-perf-users@vger.kernel.org>,
linux-kernel <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] perf/genelf: Switch deprecated openssl MD5_* functions to new EVP API
Date: Tue, 6 Sep 2022 09:33:35 -0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <Yxc+H/JHcKmvRWLr@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CABwm_eT=BHQB=ELEWTZtXG61WyYVqQfp+gy85aD3xMRycKtLwA@mail.gmail.com>
Em Tue, Sep 06, 2022 at 05:40:24PM +0800, Zixuan Tan escreveu:
> Hi Arnaldo, are there any updates?
Trying to apply it manually:
⬢[acme@toolbox perf-urgent]$ am
Applying: perf/genelf: Switch deprecated openssl MD5_* functions to new EVP API
error: corrupt patch at line 31
Patch failed at 0001 perf/genelf: Switch deprecated openssl MD5_* functions to new EVP API
hint: Use 'git am --show-current-patch=diff' to see the failed patch
When you have resolved this problem, run "git am --continue".
If you prefer to skip this patch, run "git am --skip" instead.
To restore the original branch and stop patching, run "git am --abort".
⬢[acme@toolbox perf-urgent]$ git am --abort
⬢[acme@toolbox perf-urgent]$
⬢[acme@toolbox perf-urgent]$ patch -p1 < ~/wb/1.patch
patching file tools/perf/util/genelf.c
patch: **** malformed patch at line 141: const void *code, size_t csize)
⬢[acme@toolbox perf-urgent]$
⬢[acme@toolbox perf-urgent]$ tail -30 ~/wb/1.patch
#endif
@@ -142,15 +139,20 @@ gen_build_id(struct buildid_note *note,
static void
gen_build_id(struct buildid_note *note, unsigned long load_addr,
const void *code, size_t csize)
{
- MD5_CTX context;
+ EVP_MD_CTX *mdctx;
if (sizeof(note->build_id) < 16)
errx(1, "build_id too small for MD5");
- MD5_Init(&context);
- MD5_Update(&context, &load_addr, sizeof(load_addr));
- MD5_Update(&context, code, csize);
- MD5_Final((unsigned char *)note->build_id, &context);
+ mdctx = EVP_MD_CTX_new();
+ if (!mdctx)
+ errx(2, "failed to create EVP_MD_CTX");
+
+ EVP_DigestInit_ex(mdctx, EVP_md5(), NULL);
+ EVP_DigestUpdate(mdctx, &load_addr, sizeof(load_addr));
+ EVP_DigestUpdate(mdctx, code, csize);
+ EVP_DigestFinal_ex(mdctx, (unsigned char *)note->build_id, NULL);
+ EVP_MD_CTX_free(mdctx);
}
#endif
--
2.34.1
⬢[acme@toolbox perf-urgent]$
> Thanks,
> - Zixuan
>
> On Sat, Aug 27, 2022 at 2:32 AM Namhyung Kim <namhyung@kernel.org> wrote:
> >
> > Hello,
> >
> > On Fri, Aug 26, 2022 at 10:22 AM Zixuan Tan <tanzixuan.me@gmail.com> wrote:
> > >
> > > On Fri, Aug 26, 2022 at 4:17 AM Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
> > > <arnaldo.melo@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > >
> > > > Em Fri, Aug 26, 2022 at 01:00:58AM +0800, Zixuan Tan escreveu:
> > > > > Switch to the flavored EVP API like in test-libcrypto.c, and remove the
> > > > > bad gcc #pragma.
> > > > >
> > > > > Inspired-By: 5b245985a6de ("tools build: Switch to new openssl API for
> > > > > test-libcrypto")
> > > >
> > > > How did you test the end result? Can you please describe step by step?
> > > >
> > > > Also please consider adding a 'perf test' entry to make sure this
> > > > doesn't regress.
> > >
> > > Sorry but I don't get what you mean, what results do I need to test?
> > >
> > > These EVP_* APIs are just replacements for the deprecated MD5_* APIs in
> > > openssl v3 [1][2]. With the same input, they produce the same MD5 digest.
> > >
> > > And this patch just does the migration work for the upgrade and does not
> > > change the logic of the code. so...what should I test?
> >
> > Yeah, I understand that this merely changes the MD5 APIs.
> > While it's good to have a test case for the genelf code, I don't think
> > it belongs to this patch. So,
> >
> > Acked-by: Namhyung Kim <namhyung@kernel.org>
> >
> >
> > >
> > > Links:
> > > [1] https://www.openssl.org/docs/man3.0/man3/MD5.html
> > > [2] https://stackoverflow.com/questions/69806220/advice-needed-for-migration-of-low-level-openssl-api-to-high-level-openssl-apis
--
- Arnaldo
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-09-06 12:33 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-08-25 17:00 [PATCH] perf/genelf: Switch deprecated openssl MD5_* functions to new EVP API Zixuan Tan
2022-08-25 20:17 ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2022-08-26 17:21 ` Zixuan Tan
2022-08-26 18:32 ` Namhyung Kim
2022-09-06 9:40 ` Zixuan Tan
2022-09-06 12:33 ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo [this message]
2022-09-06 12:38 ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=Yxc+H/JHcKmvRWLr@kernel.org \
--to=acme@kernel.org \
--cc=alexander.shishkin@linux.intel.com \
--cc=arnaldo.melo@gmail.com \
--cc=jolsa@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-perf-users@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mark.rutland@arm.com \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=namhyung@kernel.org \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=tanzixuan.me@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).