From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from smtp.kernel.org (aws-us-west-2-korg-mail-1.web.codeaurora.org [10.30.226.201]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 20F921DDC24; Mon, 2 Dec 2024 20:28:05 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=10.30.226.201 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1733171286; cv=none; b=hq9bIKF+QHjJZAjEj/NUd2+0jc5Tc01scji3+GXHdLz7ZVLX14h+yTLOEkfp0NYkbbiYDWzLIIvg+96aPmdSDM6M166iLTt8qiio3ErdxadBBD4HpowI5LQUZRwTe5oZIQk8HONuMYlA9FfVs8086Cs69ZC5G5rizlC3f9La3ic= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1733171286; c=relaxed/simple; bh=9LeDiFpTDfuWGn8VPz0U/7308bndESjHwusLDaDvzho=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:References:MIME-Version: Content-Type:Content-Disposition:In-Reply-To; b=IkP4mtY74dJjpIaF8JoRVexqVwr2jyjSidHyVKmjt0AvbRywlabEfcCOtDw76O5BHmhIbvxnKc8HgHwUUYQ0xpBFdKZi3Whj/+bOACG4AmiyX5qZR+eGknNaHGFf1Vr8EVUwCcm7P/MH1xXpAJUlT0hDtu8j/i1mVmu7IeHGCsQ= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b=FoNuyKaB; arc=none smtp.client-ip=10.30.226.201 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b="FoNuyKaB" Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 3005EC4CED1; Mon, 2 Dec 2024 20:28:05 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=k20201202; t=1733171285; bh=9LeDiFpTDfuWGn8VPz0U/7308bndESjHwusLDaDvzho=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:References:In-Reply-To:From; b=FoNuyKaBeYquTfe8O/wzpRy68DqrKl8kZ3XEAeMLayM0TIzPSQxtntHrSeCcoSKiB gKBlJ2VaZwI0LOWzgI8LWx5J1bk5Q7Z4DyUSV4YtfmrfYRvm9A2NMog18PfKEvEjpb x05+y7bdy9oX3mtv7rR1ZbB31GQThW/plc5XG4eQSrYPsKyQ4YdKzglGyN+ORahhzG M23JNDUQ/5enqKw3R96AjV8UNYNx1DgQlda9iuQeP4WsezANMSp6mLJNciavWwkK5i Vjao9yJ+EpoSkwSTlAcmvm0Crp8fNZ65LoU6QvqDns8fPMXmzwaf+jpE1qk5jV0ASy rfUzXHI8gIk3w== Date: Mon, 2 Dec 2024 12:28:03 -0800 From: Namhyung Kim To: Thomas Richter Cc: Leo Yan , Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo , Mark Rutland , Alexander Shishkin , Jiri Olsa , Ian Rogers , Adrian Hunter , "Liang, Kan" , Athira Rajeev , linux-perf-users@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Jing Zhang , Guilherme Amadio Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] perf test record+probe_libc_inet_pton: Make test resilient Message-ID: References: <20241202111958.553403-1-leo.yan@arm.com> <2b3bc88a-e435-4ccc-a543-c8f8566dd306@linux.ibm.com> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-perf-users@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit In-Reply-To: <2b3bc88a-e435-4ccc-a543-c8f8566dd306@linux.ibm.com> Hello, On Mon, Dec 02, 2024 at 02:48:01PM +0100, Thomas Richter wrote: > On 12/2/24 12:19, Leo Yan wrote: > > The test failed back and forth due to the call chain being heavily > > impacted by the libc, which varies across different architectures and > > distros. > > > > For s390 using 6.13.0.rc1 > > Tested-by: Thomas Richter Thanks for the test, but I think the patch excludes s390 to be safe. And I think we can test s390 in the same way. If you're willing to do some more tests, Leo can update the patch to include s390 as well. Thanks, Namhyung > > -- > Thomas Richter, Dept 3303, IBM s390 Linux Development, Boeblingen, Germany > -- > IBM Deutschland Research & Development GmbH > > Vorsitzender des Aufsichtsrats: Wolfgang Wendt > > Geschäftsführung: David Faller > > Sitz der Gesellschaft: Böblingen / Registergericht: Amtsgericht Stuttgart, HRB 243294