From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from smtp.kernel.org (aws-us-west-2-korg-mail-1.web.codeaurora.org [10.30.226.201]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 40C811F8901 for ; Tue, 3 Dec 2024 18:10:09 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=10.30.226.201 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1733249409; cv=none; b=ST6tmn0ta7SbUIP4MCUJFgCiZK1rjnuC4G+RW+v/65nAfUFKot3/vnb0FdDq7zgqysNDACKEyfstaRxqhDqgOxBrkkTC6iQbDcpnm3U6KuWbvqb9X5I5ZYXwpUaBt8tv64LjiF40d8w15r1MZK0pKvBpqWpn1UdGtnWNLZzjRIA= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1733249409; c=relaxed/simple; bh=nnDUCrPO8Iropz23V0QUybTcd+UW8xp5KCTHCW7bM34=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:References:MIME-Version: Content-Type:Content-Disposition:In-Reply-To; b=kXf4UFqd7Akv14DhMURTiXzMPLezHERpkPsBI5kgXEkYq5yKQYV2i4hxy0x2Cm372ghuAaI31gRDMklRbsxKd6XXp/lkf7AcDBIb4gMrsxLXSNrrjoE/W5p8KO7yyEUhtfnsf9yF115/sQWXdzd8hulPIjMBwWPldbcyNbO2YAA= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b=CgNS8iv9; arc=none smtp.client-ip=10.30.226.201 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b="CgNS8iv9" Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id D197EC4CECF; Tue, 3 Dec 2024 18:10:08 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=k20201202; t=1733249409; bh=nnDUCrPO8Iropz23V0QUybTcd+UW8xp5KCTHCW7bM34=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:References:In-Reply-To:From; b=CgNS8iv9VNj77hCYVjt+9Ua/I/7b3bYE6B+sA4dAZfi1P9+e28PbehGVEUIkiSd14 CGJ8E2SWqVIPH5w1oaBM0DRgyfWzhlCgXJf26z8mWPplpTSRx59Z/u1zeGu8LhUwKj AN8T8+CR26lFOlvJl+ufhmbPUSP8UJ4tbMORdE5fvVeiYbkLYR5Jy2pHrVbD5pt9v/ OrDFTvrvgMFPhT5M67OgvLi75SM1/xjyjGcr2COO/eTYUPw/YHpD4Ei80wKdhak1wg LKkmHxjTeQP/msl6YIfdAox1AP5MZJ4Rxm300gPEvokdGcv4IioFoWuFlKxvAHn19Y 5R3xEepQ2qt8w== Date: Tue, 3 Dec 2024 10:10:07 -0800 From: Namhyung Kim To: James Clark Cc: Thomas Richter , Ian Rogers , "linux-perf-use." , Athira Rajeev , Leo Yan , Sumanth Korikkar , Heiko Carstens Subject: Re: Perf test 7 fails on s390 since 6.12.0 Message-ID: References: <12338ec9-51a0-44ef-b2e6-4a95d3bf0e4d@linux.ibm.com> <8d6d43d1-51be-4412-829a-ef5875321f5b@linaro.org> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-perf-users@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <8d6d43d1-51be-4412-829a-ef5875321f5b@linaro.org> Hello, On Tue, Dec 03, 2024 at 02:37:00PM +0000, James Clark wrote: > > > On 02/12/2024 2:53 pm, Thomas Richter wrote: > > I just downloaded the latest kernel tree 6.13.0rc1 and observed several > > failures of the perf test suite. > > > > This test case is the first one: > > # ./perf test -F 7 > > Unrecognized literal '#system_tsc_freq' 7: Simple expression parser : FAILED! > > # > > Hi Thomas, > > Did you see this thread: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-perf-users/0F805B2F-35CC-4E0C-BD2F-84552C4C528E@linux.vnet.ibm.com/ > > Is that related to your issue? I looked but I couldn't find a V2 from > Athira. Oh, I missed this one. I'll take a look again and let Athira proceed. > > The same test was also mentioned on "[GIT PULL] perf-tools changes for > v6.13", but I can't tell if it's the same type of failure or not. I suspect it's the same issue. Thanks, Namhyung