* [REGRESSION] 'perf mem record' on a Intel hybrid system broken
@ 2024-12-04 17:45 Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2024-12-04 19:24 ` Namhyung Kim
0 siblings, 1 reply; 5+ messages in thread
From: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo @ 2024-12-04 17:45 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Namhyung Kim
Cc: James Clark, Ravi Bangoria, Atish Patra, Mingwei Zhang,
Kajol Jain, Thomas Richter, Palmer Dabbelt, Adrian Hunter,
Ian Rogers, Jiri Olsa, Kan Liang, Linux Kernel Mailing List,
linux-perf-users
Hi Namhyung,
root@number:/tmp# perf mem record -a sleep 1s
Error:
The sys_perf_event_open() syscall returned with 22 (Invalid argument) for event (cpu_core/mem-loads,ldlat=30/).
"dmesg | grep -i perf" may provide additional information.
root@number:/tmp# dmesg | tail
[18865.729882] ixgbe 0000:05:00.0 enp5s0: NIC Link is Up 10 Gbps, Flow Control: RX/TX
[18865.848172] mlx5_core 0000:01:00.0 enp1s0f0np0: Link down
[18866.057990] mlx5_core 0000:01:00.1 enp1s0f1np1: Link down
[19066.396215] input: JBL RACE TWS (AVRCP) as /devices/virtual/input/input27
[19078.378477] usb 2-3: current rate 16000 is different from the runtime rate 48000
[21158.375680] usb 2-3: current rate 16000 is different from the runtime rate 48000
[31386.186675] input: JBL RACE TWS (AVRCP) as /devices/virtual/input/input28
[31409.098352] usb 2-3: current rate 16000 is different from the runtime rate 48000
[36409.737615] sysrq: Emergency Sync
[36409.742619] Emergency Sync complete
root@number:/tmp#
That I bisected down to:
⬢ [acme@toolbox perf-tools-next]$ git bisect good
af954f76eea56453713ae657f6812d4063f9bc57 is the first bad commit
commit af954f76eea56453713ae657f6812d4063f9bc57
Author: Namhyung Kim <namhyung@kernel.org>
Date: Tue Oct 15 23:23:57 2024 -0700
perf tools: Check fallback error and order
The perf_event_open might fail due to various reasons, so blindly
reducing precise_ip level might not be the best way to deal with it.
It seems the kernel return -EOPNOTSUPP when PMU doesn't support the
given precise level. Let's try again with the correct error code.
This caused a problem on AMD, as it stops on precise_ip of 2 for IBS but
user events with exclude_kernel=1 cannot make progress. Let's add the
evsel__handle_error_quirks() to this case specially. I plan to work on
the kernel side to improve this situation but it'd still need some
special handling for IBS.
Reviewed-by: James Clark <james.clark@linaro.org>
Reviewed-by: Ravi Bangoria <ravi.bangoria@amd.com>
Acked-by: Kan Liang <kan.liang@linux.intel.com>
Cc: James Clark <james.clark@arm.com>
Cc: Atish Patra <atishp@atishpatra.org>
Cc: Mingwei Zhang <mizhang@google.com>
Cc: Kajol Jain <kjain@linux.ibm.com>
Cc: Thomas Richter <tmricht@linux.ibm.com>
Cc: Palmer Dabbelt <palmer@rivosinc.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20241016062359.264929-8-namhyung@kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Namhyung Kim <namhyung@kernel.org>
If I revert that patch:
⬢ [acme@toolbox perf-tools-next]$ git log --oneline -5
9a9f2d6da1ea5ef5 (HEAD -> perf-tools-next) Revert "perf tools: Check fallback error and order"
d12d4cfc5033cd8c perf script python: Improve physical mem type resolution
3f79d822e331022f perf disasm: Return a proper error when not determining the file type
1a5b914261f0ebee tools features: Don't check for libunwind devel files by default
40384c840ea1944d (tag: v6.13-rc1, perf-tools/perf-tools) Linux 6.13-rc1
⬢ [acme@toolbox perf-tools-next]$
And rebuild, it works again:
root@number:/tmp# perf mem record -a sleep 1s
[ perf record: Woken up 1 times to write data ]
[ perf record: Captured and wrote 13.014 MB perf.data (10316 samples) ]
root@number:/tmp# perf evlist
cpu_atom/mem-loads,ldlat=30/P
cpu_atom/mem-stores/P
cpu_core/mem-loads-aux/
cpu_core/mem-loads,ldlat=30/
cpu_core/mem-stores/P
dummy:u
# Tip: use 'perf evlist -g' to show group information
root@number:/tmp# perf evlist -v
cpu_atom/mem-loads,ldlat=30/P: type: 10 (cpu_atom), size: 136, config: 0x5d0 (mem-loads), { sample_period, sample_freq }: 4000, sample_type: IP|TID|TIME|ADDR|CPU|PERIOD|IDENTIFIER|DATA_SRC|WEIGHT_STRUCT, read_format: ID|LOST, disabled: 1, freq: 1, precise_ip: 3, sample_id_all: 1, { bp_addr, config1 }: 0x1f
cpu_atom/mem-stores/P: type: 10 (cpu_atom), size: 136, config: 0x6d0 (mem-stores), { sample_period, sample_freq }: 4000, sample_type: IP|TID|TIME|ADDR|CPU|PERIOD|IDENTIFIER|DATA_SRC|WEIGHT_STRUCT, read_format: ID|LOST, disabled: 1, freq: 1, precise_ip: 3, sample_id_all: 1
cpu_core/mem-loads-aux/: type: 4 (cpu_core), size: 136, config: 0x8203 (mem-loads-aux), { sample_period, sample_freq }: 4000, sample_type: IP|TID|TIME|ADDR|CPU|PERIOD|IDENTIFIER|DATA_SRC|WEIGHT_STRUCT, read_format: ID|LOST, disabled: 1, freq: 1, precise_ip: 3, sample_id_all: 1
cpu_core/mem-loads,ldlat=30/: type: 4 (cpu_core), size: 136, config: 0x1cd (mem-loads), { sample_period, sample_freq }: 4000, sample_type: IP|TID|TIME|ADDR|CPU|PERIOD|IDENTIFIER|DATA_SRC|WEIGHT_STRUCT, read_format: ID|LOST, freq: 1, precise_ip: 2, sample_id_all: 1, { bp_addr, config1 }: 0x1f
cpu_core/mem-stores/P: type: 4 (cpu_core), size: 136, config: 0x2cd (mem-stores), { sample_period, sample_freq }: 4000, sample_type: IP|TID|TIME|ADDR|CPU|PERIOD|IDENTIFIER|DATA_SRC|WEIGHT_STRUCT, read_format: ID|LOST, disabled: 1, freq: 1, precise_ip: 3, sample_id_all: 1
dummy:u: type: 1 (software), size: 136, config: 0x9 (PERF_COUNT_SW_DUMMY), { sample_period, sample_freq }: 1, sample_type: IP|TID|TIME|ADDR|CPU|IDENTIFIER|DATA_SRC|WEIGHT_STRUCT, read_format: ID|LOST, exclude_kernel: 1, exclude_hv: 1, mmap: 1, comm: 1, task: 1, mmap_data: 1, sample_id_all: 1, exclude_guest: 1, mmap2: 1, comm_exec: 1, ksymbol: 1, bpf_event: 1
# Tip: use 'perf evlist -g' to show group information
root@number:/tmp# perf evlist -g
cpu_atom/mem-loads,ldlat=30/P
cpu_atom/mem-stores/P
{cpu_core/mem-loads-aux/,cpu_core/mem-loads,ldlat=30/}
cpu_core/mem-stores/P
dummy:u
root@number:/tmp#
Now trying to investigate this,
- Arnaldo
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* Re: [REGRESSION] 'perf mem record' on a Intel hybrid system broken
2024-12-04 17:45 [REGRESSION] 'perf mem record' on a Intel hybrid system broken Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
@ 2024-12-04 19:24 ` Namhyung Kim
2024-12-11 17:55 ` Liang, Kan
0 siblings, 1 reply; 5+ messages in thread
From: Namhyung Kim @ 2024-12-04 19:24 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
Cc: James Clark, Ravi Bangoria, Atish Patra, Mingwei Zhang,
Kajol Jain, Thomas Richter, Palmer Dabbelt, Adrian Hunter,
Ian Rogers, Jiri Olsa, Kan Liang, Linux Kernel Mailing List,
linux-perf-users
Hi Arnaldo,
On Wed, Dec 04, 2024 at 02:45:48PM -0300, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo wrote:
> Hi Namhyung,
>
> root@number:/tmp# perf mem record -a sleep 1s
> Error:
> The sys_perf_event_open() syscall returned with 22 (Invalid argument) for event (cpu_core/mem-loads,ldlat=30/).
> "dmesg | grep -i perf" may provide additional information.
>
> root@number:/tmp# dmesg | tail
> [18865.729882] ixgbe 0000:05:00.0 enp5s0: NIC Link is Up 10 Gbps, Flow Control: RX/TX
> [18865.848172] mlx5_core 0000:01:00.0 enp1s0f0np0: Link down
> [18866.057990] mlx5_core 0000:01:00.1 enp1s0f1np1: Link down
> [19066.396215] input: JBL RACE TWS (AVRCP) as /devices/virtual/input/input27
> [19078.378477] usb 2-3: current rate 16000 is different from the runtime rate 48000
> [21158.375680] usb 2-3: current rate 16000 is different from the runtime rate 48000
> [31386.186675] input: JBL RACE TWS (AVRCP) as /devices/virtual/input/input28
> [31409.098352] usb 2-3: current rate 16000 is different from the runtime rate 48000
> [36409.737615] sysrq: Emergency Sync
> [36409.742619] Emergency Sync complete
> root@number:/tmp#
>
> That I bisected down to:
>
> ⬢ [acme@toolbox perf-tools-next]$ git bisect good
> af954f76eea56453713ae657f6812d4063f9bc57 is the first bad commit
> commit af954f76eea56453713ae657f6812d4063f9bc57
> Author: Namhyung Kim <namhyung@kernel.org>
> Date: Tue Oct 15 23:23:57 2024 -0700
>
> perf tools: Check fallback error and order
>
> The perf_event_open might fail due to various reasons, so blindly
> reducing precise_ip level might not be the best way to deal with it.
>
> It seems the kernel return -EOPNOTSUPP when PMU doesn't support the
> given precise level. Let's try again with the correct error code.
>
> This caused a problem on AMD, as it stops on precise_ip of 2 for IBS but
> user events with exclude_kernel=1 cannot make progress. Let's add the
> evsel__handle_error_quirks() to this case specially. I plan to work on
> the kernel side to improve this situation but it'd still need some
> special handling for IBS.
>
> Reviewed-by: James Clark <james.clark@linaro.org>
> Reviewed-by: Ravi Bangoria <ravi.bangoria@amd.com>
> Acked-by: Kan Liang <kan.liang@linux.intel.com>
> Cc: James Clark <james.clark@arm.com>
> Cc: Atish Patra <atishp@atishpatra.org>
> Cc: Mingwei Zhang <mizhang@google.com>
> Cc: Kajol Jain <kjain@linux.ibm.com>
> Cc: Thomas Richter <tmricht@linux.ibm.com>
> Cc: Palmer Dabbelt <palmer@rivosinc.com>
> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20241016062359.264929-8-namhyung@kernel.org
> Signed-off-by: Namhyung Kim <namhyung@kernel.org>
>
> If I revert that patch:
>
> ⬢ [acme@toolbox perf-tools-next]$ git log --oneline -5
> 9a9f2d6da1ea5ef5 (HEAD -> perf-tools-next) Revert "perf tools: Check fallback error and order"
> d12d4cfc5033cd8c perf script python: Improve physical mem type resolution
> 3f79d822e331022f perf disasm: Return a proper error when not determining the file type
> 1a5b914261f0ebee tools features: Don't check for libunwind devel files by default
> 40384c840ea1944d (tag: v6.13-rc1, perf-tools/perf-tools) Linux 6.13-rc1
> ⬢ [acme@toolbox perf-tools-next]$
>
> And rebuild, it works again:
>
> root@number:/tmp# perf mem record -a sleep 1s
> [ perf record: Woken up 1 times to write data ]
> [ perf record: Captured and wrote 13.014 MB perf.data (10316 samples) ]
> root@number:/tmp# perf evlist
> cpu_atom/mem-loads,ldlat=30/P
> cpu_atom/mem-stores/P
> cpu_core/mem-loads-aux/
> cpu_core/mem-loads,ldlat=30/
> cpu_core/mem-stores/P
> dummy:u
> # Tip: use 'perf evlist -g' to show group information
> root@number:/tmp# perf evlist -v
> cpu_atom/mem-loads,ldlat=30/P: type: 10 (cpu_atom), size: 136, config: 0x5d0 (mem-loads), { sample_period, sample_freq }: 4000, sample_type: IP|TID|TIME|ADDR|CPU|PERIOD|IDENTIFIER|DATA_SRC|WEIGHT_STRUCT, read_format: ID|LOST, disabled: 1, freq: 1, precise_ip: 3, sample_id_all: 1, { bp_addr, config1 }: 0x1f
> cpu_atom/mem-stores/P: type: 10 (cpu_atom), size: 136, config: 0x6d0 (mem-stores), { sample_period, sample_freq }: 4000, sample_type: IP|TID|TIME|ADDR|CPU|PERIOD|IDENTIFIER|DATA_SRC|WEIGHT_STRUCT, read_format: ID|LOST, disabled: 1, freq: 1, precise_ip: 3, sample_id_all: 1
> cpu_core/mem-loads-aux/: type: 4 (cpu_core), size: 136, config: 0x8203 (mem-loads-aux), { sample_period, sample_freq }: 4000, sample_type: IP|TID|TIME|ADDR|CPU|PERIOD|IDENTIFIER|DATA_SRC|WEIGHT_STRUCT, read_format: ID|LOST, disabled: 1, freq: 1, precise_ip: 3, sample_id_all: 1
> cpu_core/mem-loads,ldlat=30/: type: 4 (cpu_core), size: 136, config: 0x1cd (mem-loads), { sample_period, sample_freq }: 4000, sample_type: IP|TID|TIME|ADDR|CPU|PERIOD|IDENTIFIER|DATA_SRC|WEIGHT_STRUCT, read_format: ID|LOST, freq: 1, precise_ip: 2, sample_id_all: 1, { bp_addr, config1 }: 0x1f
> cpu_core/mem-stores/P: type: 4 (cpu_core), size: 136, config: 0x2cd (mem-stores), { sample_period, sample_freq }: 4000, sample_type: IP|TID|TIME|ADDR|CPU|PERIOD|IDENTIFIER|DATA_SRC|WEIGHT_STRUCT, read_format: ID|LOST, disabled: 1, freq: 1, precise_ip: 3, sample_id_all: 1
> dummy:u: type: 1 (software), size: 136, config: 0x9 (PERF_COUNT_SW_DUMMY), { sample_period, sample_freq }: 1, sample_type: IP|TID|TIME|ADDR|CPU|IDENTIFIER|DATA_SRC|WEIGHT_STRUCT, read_format: ID|LOST, exclude_kernel: 1, exclude_hv: 1, mmap: 1, comm: 1, task: 1, mmap_data: 1, sample_id_all: 1, exclude_guest: 1, mmap2: 1, comm_exec: 1, ksymbol: 1, bpf_event: 1
> # Tip: use 'perf evlist -g' to show group information
> root@number:/tmp# perf evlist -g
> cpu_atom/mem-loads,ldlat=30/P
> cpu_atom/mem-stores/P
> {cpu_core/mem-loads-aux/,cpu_core/mem-loads,ldlat=30/}
> cpu_core/mem-stores/P
> dummy:u
> root@number:/tmp#
>
> Now trying to investigate this,
I think I got a related report from the kernel test robot but it was a
Sapphire Rapids machine. I don't have a Intel hybrid machine in hand.
I'll try to take a look at it on Sapphire Rapids.
Thanks,
Namhyung
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* Re: [REGRESSION] 'perf mem record' on a Intel hybrid system broken
2024-12-04 19:24 ` Namhyung Kim
@ 2024-12-11 17:55 ` Liang, Kan
2024-12-11 18:48 ` Namhyung Kim
0 siblings, 1 reply; 5+ messages in thread
From: Liang, Kan @ 2024-12-11 17:55 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Namhyung Kim, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
Cc: James Clark, Ravi Bangoria, Atish Patra, Mingwei Zhang,
Kajol Jain, Thomas Richter, Palmer Dabbelt, Adrian Hunter,
Ian Rogers, Jiri Olsa, Linux Kernel Mailing List,
linux-perf-users
On 2024-12-04 2:24 p.m., Namhyung Kim wrote:
> Hi Arnaldo,
>
> On Wed, Dec 04, 2024 at 02:45:48PM -0300, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo wrote:
>> Hi Namhyung,
>>
>> root@number:/tmp# perf mem record -a sleep 1s
>> Error:
>> The sys_perf_event_open() syscall returned with 22 (Invalid argument) for event (cpu_core/mem-loads,ldlat=30/).
>> "dmesg | grep -i perf" may provide additional information.
>>
>> root@number:/tmp# dmesg | tail
>> [18865.729882] ixgbe 0000:05:00.0 enp5s0: NIC Link is Up 10 Gbps, Flow Control: RX/TX
>> [18865.848172] mlx5_core 0000:01:00.0 enp1s0f0np0: Link down
>> [18866.057990] mlx5_core 0000:01:00.1 enp1s0f1np1: Link down
>> [19066.396215] input: JBL RACE TWS (AVRCP) as /devices/virtual/input/input27
>> [19078.378477] usb 2-3: current rate 16000 is different from the runtime rate 48000
>> [21158.375680] usb 2-3: current rate 16000 is different from the runtime rate 48000
>> [31386.186675] input: JBL RACE TWS (AVRCP) as /devices/virtual/input/input28
>> [31409.098352] usb 2-3: current rate 16000 is different from the runtime rate 48000
>> [36409.737615] sysrq: Emergency Sync
>> [36409.742619] Emergency Sync complete
>> root@number:/tmp#
>>
>> That I bisected down to:
>>
>> ⬢ [acme@toolbox perf-tools-next]$ git bisect good
>> af954f76eea56453713ae657f6812d4063f9bc57 is the first bad commit
>> commit af954f76eea56453713ae657f6812d4063f9bc57
>> Author: Namhyung Kim <namhyung@kernel.org>
>> Date: Tue Oct 15 23:23:57 2024 -0700
>>
>> perf tools: Check fallback error and order
>>
>> The perf_event_open might fail due to various reasons, so blindly
>> reducing precise_ip level might not be the best way to deal with it.
>>
>> It seems the kernel return -EOPNOTSUPP when PMU doesn't support the
>> given precise level. Let's try again with the correct error code.
>>
>> This caused a problem on AMD, as it stops on precise_ip of 2 for IBS but
>> user events with exclude_kernel=1 cannot make progress. Let's add the
>> evsel__handle_error_quirks() to this case specially. I plan to work on
>> the kernel side to improve this situation but it'd still need some
>> special handling for IBS.
>>
>> Reviewed-by: James Clark <james.clark@linaro.org>
>> Reviewed-by: Ravi Bangoria <ravi.bangoria@amd.com>
>> Acked-by: Kan Liang <kan.liang@linux.intel.com>
>> Cc: James Clark <james.clark@arm.com>
>> Cc: Atish Patra <atishp@atishpatra.org>
>> Cc: Mingwei Zhang <mizhang@google.com>
>> Cc: Kajol Jain <kjain@linux.ibm.com>
>> Cc: Thomas Richter <tmricht@linux.ibm.com>
>> Cc: Palmer Dabbelt <palmer@rivosinc.com>
>> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20241016062359.264929-8-namhyung@kernel.org
>> Signed-off-by: Namhyung Kim <namhyung@kernel.org>
>>
>> If I revert that patch:
>>
>> ⬢ [acme@toolbox perf-tools-next]$ git log --oneline -5
>> 9a9f2d6da1ea5ef5 (HEAD -> perf-tools-next) Revert "perf tools: Check fallback error and order"
>> d12d4cfc5033cd8c perf script python: Improve physical mem type resolution
>> 3f79d822e331022f perf disasm: Return a proper error when not determining the file type
>> 1a5b914261f0ebee tools features: Don't check for libunwind devel files by default
>> 40384c840ea1944d (tag: v6.13-rc1, perf-tools/perf-tools) Linux 6.13-rc1
>> ⬢ [acme@toolbox perf-tools-next]$
>>
>> And rebuild, it works again:
>>
>> root@number:/tmp# perf mem record -a sleep 1s
>> [ perf record: Woken up 1 times to write data ]
>> [ perf record: Captured and wrote 13.014 MB perf.data (10316 samples) ]
>> root@number:/tmp# perf evlist
>> cpu_atom/mem-loads,ldlat=30/P
>> cpu_atom/mem-stores/P
>> cpu_core/mem-loads-aux/
>> cpu_core/mem-loads,ldlat=30/
>> cpu_core/mem-stores/P
>> dummy:u
>> # Tip: use 'perf evlist -g' to show group information
>> root@number:/tmp# perf evlist -v
>> cpu_atom/mem-loads,ldlat=30/P: type: 10 (cpu_atom), size: 136, config: 0x5d0 (mem-loads), { sample_period, sample_freq }: 4000, sample_type: IP|TID|TIME|ADDR|CPU|PERIOD|IDENTIFIER|DATA_SRC|WEIGHT_STRUCT, read_format: ID|LOST, disabled: 1, freq: 1, precise_ip: 3, sample_id_all: 1, { bp_addr, config1 }: 0x1f
>> cpu_atom/mem-stores/P: type: 10 (cpu_atom), size: 136, config: 0x6d0 (mem-stores), { sample_period, sample_freq }: 4000, sample_type: IP|TID|TIME|ADDR|CPU|PERIOD|IDENTIFIER|DATA_SRC|WEIGHT_STRUCT, read_format: ID|LOST, disabled: 1, freq: 1, precise_ip: 3, sample_id_all: 1
>> cpu_core/mem-loads-aux/: type: 4 (cpu_core), size: 136, config: 0x8203 (mem-loads-aux), { sample_period, sample_freq }: 4000, sample_type: IP|TID|TIME|ADDR|CPU|PERIOD|IDENTIFIER|DATA_SRC|WEIGHT_STRUCT, read_format: ID|LOST, disabled: 1, freq: 1, precise_ip: 3, sample_id_all: 1
>> cpu_core/mem-loads,ldlat=30/: type: 4 (cpu_core), size: 136, config: 0x1cd (mem-loads), { sample_period, sample_freq }: 4000, sample_type: IP|TID|TIME|ADDR|CPU|PERIOD|IDENTIFIER|DATA_SRC|WEIGHT_STRUCT, read_format: ID|LOST, freq: 1, precise_ip: 2, sample_id_all: 1, { bp_addr, config1 }: 0x1f
>> cpu_core/mem-stores/P: type: 4 (cpu_core), size: 136, config: 0x2cd (mem-stores), { sample_period, sample_freq }: 4000, sample_type: IP|TID|TIME|ADDR|CPU|PERIOD|IDENTIFIER|DATA_SRC|WEIGHT_STRUCT, read_format: ID|LOST, disabled: 1, freq: 1, precise_ip: 3, sample_id_all: 1
>> dummy:u: type: 1 (software), size: 136, config: 0x9 (PERF_COUNT_SW_DUMMY), { sample_period, sample_freq }: 1, sample_type: IP|TID|TIME|ADDR|CPU|IDENTIFIER|DATA_SRC|WEIGHT_STRUCT, read_format: ID|LOST, exclude_kernel: 1, exclude_hv: 1, mmap: 1, comm: 1, task: 1, mmap_data: 1, sample_id_all: 1, exclude_guest: 1, mmap2: 1, comm_exec: 1, ksymbol: 1, bpf_event: 1
>> # Tip: use 'perf evlist -g' to show group information
>> root@number:/tmp# perf evlist -g
>> cpu_atom/mem-loads,ldlat=30/P
>> cpu_atom/mem-stores/P
>> {cpu_core/mem-loads-aux/,cpu_core/mem-loads,ldlat=30/}
>> cpu_core/mem-stores/P
>> dummy:u
>> root@number:/tmp#
>>
>> Now trying to investigate this,
>
> I think I got a related report from the kernel test robot but it was a
> Sapphire Rapids machine. I don't have a Intel hybrid machine in hand.
> I'll try to take a look at it on Sapphire Rapids.
The default precise_ip level for perf mem is always 3.
For the latest intel platforms, it implies PDist, which is only
available on GP 0.
https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git/tree/arch/x86/events/intel/core.c#n4412
However, the mem-load PEBS event is available on all GP counters but GP
0. :(
https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git/tree/arch/x86/events/intel/ds.c#n1176
So the precise_ip-- is required.
The failure of scheduling returns -EINVAL.
But Namhyung's patch assumes that the kernel return -EOPNOTSUPP when PMU
doesn't support the given precise level.
(Sorry, I didn't notice the case early.)
Is it possible to reduce the precise_ip for the -EINVAL as well?
Thanks,
Kan
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* Re: [REGRESSION] 'perf mem record' on a Intel hybrid system broken
2024-12-11 17:55 ` Liang, Kan
@ 2024-12-11 18:48 ` Namhyung Kim
2024-12-11 20:13 ` Liang, Kan
0 siblings, 1 reply; 5+ messages in thread
From: Namhyung Kim @ 2024-12-11 18:48 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Liang, Kan
Cc: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo, James Clark, Ravi Bangoria, Atish Patra,
Mingwei Zhang, Kajol Jain, Thomas Richter, Palmer Dabbelt,
Adrian Hunter, Ian Rogers, Jiri Olsa, Linux Kernel Mailing List,
linux-perf-users
On Wed, Dec 11, 2024 at 12:55:03PM -0500, Liang, Kan wrote:
> On 2024-12-04 2:24 p.m., Namhyung Kim wrote:
> > I think I got a related report from the kernel test robot but it was a
> > Sapphire Rapids machine. I don't have a Intel hybrid machine in hand.
> > I'll try to take a look at it on Sapphire Rapids.
>
> The default precise_ip level for perf mem is always 3.
>
> For the latest intel platforms, it implies PDist, which is only
> available on GP 0.
> https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git/tree/arch/x86/events/intel/core.c#n4412
>
> However, the mem-load PEBS event is available on all GP counters but GP
> 0. :(
> https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git/tree/arch/x86/events/intel/ds.c#n1176
>
> So the precise_ip-- is required.
>
> The failure of scheduling returns -EINVAL.
>
> But Namhyung's patch assumes that the kernel return -EOPNOTSUPP when PMU
> doesn't support the given precise level.
> (Sorry, I didn't notice the case early.)
>
> Is it possible to reduce the precise_ip for the -EINVAL as well?
Sure, please see https://lore.kernel.org/r/Z1DV0lN8qHSysX7f@google.com
Thanks,
Namhyung
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* Re: [REGRESSION] 'perf mem record' on a Intel hybrid system broken
2024-12-11 18:48 ` Namhyung Kim
@ 2024-12-11 20:13 ` Liang, Kan
0 siblings, 0 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: Liang, Kan @ 2024-12-11 20:13 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Namhyung Kim
Cc: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo, James Clark, Ravi Bangoria, Atish Patra,
Mingwei Zhang, Kajol Jain, Thomas Richter, Palmer Dabbelt,
Adrian Hunter, Ian Rogers, Jiri Olsa, Linux Kernel Mailing List,
linux-perf-users
On 2024-12-11 1:48 p.m., Namhyung Kim wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 11, 2024 at 12:55:03PM -0500, Liang, Kan wrote:
>> On 2024-12-04 2:24 p.m., Namhyung Kim wrote:
>>> I think I got a related report from the kernel test robot but it was a
>>> Sapphire Rapids machine. I don't have a Intel hybrid machine in hand.
>>> I'll try to take a look at it on Sapphire Rapids.
>>
>> The default precise_ip level for perf mem is always 3.
>>
>> For the latest intel platforms, it implies PDist, which is only
>> available on GP 0.
>> https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git/tree/arch/x86/events/intel/core.c#n4412
>>
>> However, the mem-load PEBS event is available on all GP counters but GP
>> 0. :(
>> https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git/tree/arch/x86/events/intel/ds.c#n1176
>>
>> So the precise_ip-- is required.
>>
>> The failure of scheduling returns -EINVAL.
>>
>> But Namhyung's patch assumes that the kernel return -EOPNOTSUPP when PMU
>> doesn't support the given precise level.
>> (Sorry, I didn't notice the case early.)
>>
>> Is it possible to reduce the precise_ip for the -EINVAL as well?
>
> Sure, please see https://lore.kernel.org/r/Z1DV0lN8qHSysX7f@google.com
>
Thanks for the fix. It looks good to me.
Reviewed-by: Kan Liang <kan.liang@linux.intel.com>
Thanks,
Kan
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2024-12-11 20:13 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2024-12-04 17:45 [REGRESSION] 'perf mem record' on a Intel hybrid system broken Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2024-12-04 19:24 ` Namhyung Kim
2024-12-11 17:55 ` Liang, Kan
2024-12-11 18:48 ` Namhyung Kim
2024-12-11 20:13 ` Liang, Kan
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).