From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from smtp.kernel.org (aws-us-west-2-korg-mail-1.web.codeaurora.org [10.30.226.201]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8FD6A78F36; Tue, 10 Dec 2024 14:07:19 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=10.30.226.201 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1733839639; cv=none; b=Fme2AHg0jNufV7933RV4Z2+S4qGZQXYTseY4yvXpJ+JSf3idRU3QYYYLEk3u4UdUuj/NIOC33b0t462VQY3ebvtizA+r4LRe+2OivkBhoTDxHam3bEwM1bbmnYUzIvjKj72bd6AlAi1eWRVFkYS0HiMlALNIBKdqIWRS6GYTuWA= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1733839639; c=relaxed/simple; bh=i9G83b35R57ZrkD9ceAYPAVQmGkZPFS0wVEM8ZlFXYQ=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:References:MIME-Version: Content-Type:Content-Disposition:In-Reply-To; b=hjvA9X7pigHHjY89rmvf1ufMz96yy5DIPsYMwKNo9XDs2sf173kogza4569aenV7Ub9CYfW7a+muxc/lGfatILM45VHuR6aqMD5yoOOmc0mNnGB6RvMVQWpgWBsQ/9ZSJcCrKibAIMFYylYYjfzVxL1Ex4IotOvdbqn5gAtJOcI= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b=hohfcpAy; arc=none smtp.client-ip=10.30.226.201 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b="hohfcpAy" Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 3E97EC4CED6; Tue, 10 Dec 2024 14:07:17 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=k20201202; t=1733839639; bh=i9G83b35R57ZrkD9ceAYPAVQmGkZPFS0wVEM8ZlFXYQ=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:References:In-Reply-To:From; b=hohfcpAyEew2WhwjL/IXEsWcOQ1wPbUTqBid2L4cshcjM0Aw4txRyHGB1Z8BNpMrM QPP0xt9M14fNvbLveRyNL6V8DluRM47cjV5QqleTeRSPW+YFjl030nux9D4YLqTW6b 8KyH4ua5GWQKX+Bj+ubiw3ygSuU2JAV6//3YptawVKzcs9TXxAtJiubhaDNNINqhb9 d+q80jUFvbF++IjIswb2u1C4tpogbtzOq4iXubRSQLe+y1gQql1NprEl0uHbu4TOjK dJJNk1G1/FLlPTeynuv4xIE1Fa8zMNEbbfaqfUxemb0WtEnDH3a/AQlZJHxVp/EsEo 028/7g8PIIR8Q== Date: Tue, 10 Dec 2024 11:07:13 -0300 From: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo To: James Clark Cc: Namhyung Kim , linux-perf-users@vger.kernel.org, Ian Rogers , thomas.falcon@intel.com, Peter Zijlstra , Ingo Molnar , Mark Rutland , Alexander Shishkin , Jiri Olsa , Adrian Hunter , "Liang, Kan" , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/2] libperf: evlist: Fix --cpu argument on hybrid platform Message-ID: References: <20241114160450.295844-1-james.clark@linaro.org> <20241114160450.295844-2-james.clark@linaro.org> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-perf-users@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: On Tue, Dec 10, 2024 at 01:56:21PM +0000, James Clark wrote: > On 10/12/2024 1:51 pm, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo wrote: > > James, the second patch isn't applying to perf-tools/perf-tools. > The second one applies on > https://lore.kernel.org/linux-perf-users/20241113011956.402096-1-irogers@google.com/T/#m2a3587fb83e6ab2d970bae25982ae9d6c8d9e5cd > because that also does an evlist__remove() which gets fixed up. Right, I have to test that series on the ARM machines I have access to, but there is a question from a tester that is waiting for a reply, I'll see if I can reproduce that problem as well. > But the first one is ok to go in on its own. Agreed. - Arnaldo