From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from smtp.kernel.org (aws-us-west-2-korg-mail-1.web.codeaurora.org [10.30.226.201]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1919A204696; Tue, 10 Dec 2024 18:10:23 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=10.30.226.201 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1733854224; cv=none; b=f+Xh2sZRnc8bbFgYuACz6V1e5DCRT/Y8SANWoHiT/Sggdt7CzsBsasVuC7A3SBJx+K6Jo3qc9y8dRReFGEVh/AHVWaVjYmiQq9pnaJMeaUoty+ZCKlNCMpv3rtkov9/aIa+4FKkTfWzbfffHP95YKC7q0jnza3cNA0i8RukadR4= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1733854224; c=relaxed/simple; bh=lp1TUjNspJzYk33DGagyaO+1G26pRYTDVB5oy+2mDH0=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:References:MIME-Version: Content-Type:Content-Disposition:In-Reply-To; b=VQlYv5oeZhWxLLJc4olqKL0EgjXf4gA/HpyYogo44eqlKX1QXh29IdBrTEzjLUfPqUudFMh6kh+YLfuci4mWNKP6HKutps8cWvIjFVzY8u0/ODTkkTEcS/Ywh+RHdQvtLEan8gx66aXNxfEe32BDzxhWcZ6If2L+2rmsJzTj1gU= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b=Hii1bNp/; arc=none smtp.client-ip=10.30.226.201 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b="Hii1bNp/" Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 0FBC2C4CED6; Tue, 10 Dec 2024 18:10:23 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=k20201202; t=1733854223; bh=lp1TUjNspJzYk33DGagyaO+1G26pRYTDVB5oy+2mDH0=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:References:In-Reply-To:From; b=Hii1bNp/rQgWLNCGXs3EIRYEzrbQYZybIR9Ek2te83yvTMMOwRCkMqt+m3oSeYGyF yertm6LsIGhmmxR8TKAPiDRv5cvQPvQw20TmQEhALw1AUaw+9Xt+xLuLI4xmgyI/Pd dlr0vKErUvcc1FVRG4NaICzNtFhDdy2xHBvSZjOgKvi+k+qH2xvbujn97Tn6bBc3xb YA477U4k1jwJvcJZPKgbZm+lYMxvQrcmkw+Xx6ZXTzr3b/QpqvaDjYE+zRmkt8YNkS QlTR2pWHhZUb9/DDMQ6Hh3MFe7APleAIVSlZA1tFECc7xDyOkg/uDZNUORTFSpX8mG ytv06FbrGB5eQ== Date: Tue, 10 Dec 2024 10:10:21 -0800 From: Namhyung Kim To: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo Cc: James Clark , linux-perf-users@vger.kernel.org, Ian Rogers , thomas.falcon@intel.com, Peter Zijlstra , Ingo Molnar , Mark Rutland , Alexander Shishkin , Jiri Olsa , Adrian Hunter , "Liang, Kan" , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/2] libperf: evlist: Fix --cpu argument on hybrid platform Message-ID: References: <20241114160450.295844-1-james.clark@linaro.org> <20241114160450.295844-2-james.clark@linaro.org> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-perf-users@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: On Tue, Dec 10, 2024 at 11:07:13AM -0300, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo wrote: > On Tue, Dec 10, 2024 at 01:56:21PM +0000, James Clark wrote: > > On 10/12/2024 1:51 pm, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo wrote: > > > James, the second patch isn't applying to perf-tools/perf-tools. > > > The second one applies on > > https://lore.kernel.org/linux-perf-users/20241113011956.402096-1-irogers@google.com/T/#m2a3587fb83e6ab2d970bae25982ae9d6c8d9e5cd > > because that also does an evlist__remove() which gets fixed up. > > Right, I have to test that series on the ARM machines I have access to, > but there is a question from a tester that is waiting for a reply, I'll > see if I can reproduce that problem as well. > > > But the first one is ok to go in on its own. > > Agreed. Ok, I'll pick this one to perf-tools and leave the patch 2 go into perf-tools-next. Thanks, Namhyung