From: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@kernel.org>
To: Namhyung Kim <namhyung@kernel.org>
Cc: Ian Rogers <irogers@google.com>,
Kan Liang <kan.liang@linux.intel.com>,
Jiri Olsa <jolsa@kernel.org>,
Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@intel.com>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
linux-perf-users@vger.kernel.org,
Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>, Song Liu <song@kernel.org>,
bpf@vger.kernel.org, Stephane Eranian <eranian@google.com>,
Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz>,
Roman Gushchin <roman.gushchin@linux.dev>,
Hyeonggon Yoo <42.hyeyoo@gmail.com>, Kees Cook <kees@kernel.org>,
Chun-Tse Shao <ctshao@google.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 0/4] perf lock contention: Symbolize locks using slab cache names
Date: Fri, 20 Dec 2024 16:20:37 -0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <Z2XDhXZsfUVtU7MY@x1> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20241220060009.507297-1-namhyung@kernel.org>
On Thu, Dec 19, 2024 at 10:00:05PM -0800, Namhyung Kim wrote:
> Hello,
>
> This is to support symbolization of dynamic locks using slab
> allocator's metadata. The kernel support is merged to v6.13.
>
> It provides the new "kmem_cache" BPF iterator and "bpf_get_kmem_cache"
> kfunc to get the information from an address. The feature detection is
> done using BTF type info and it won't have any effect on old kernels.
>
> v3 changes)
>
> * fix build error with GEN_VMLINUX_H=1 (Arnaldo)
Thanks, applied to perf-tools-next,
- Arnaldo
> * update comment to explain slab cache ID (Vlastimil)
> * add Ian's Acked-by
>
> v2) https://lore.kernel.org/linux-perf-users/20241108061500.2698340-1-namhyung@kernel.org
>
> * don't use libbpf_get_error() (Andrii)
>
> v1) https://lore.kernel.org/linux-perf-users/20241105172635.2463800-1-namhyung@kernel.org
>
> With this change, it can show locks in a slab object like below. I
> added "&" sign to distinguish them from global locks.
>
> # perf lock con -abl sleep 1
> contended total wait max wait avg wait address symbol
>
> 2 1.95 us 1.77 us 975 ns ffff9d5e852d3498 &task_struct (mutex)
> 1 1.18 us 1.18 us 1.18 us ffff9d5e852d3538 &task_struct (mutex)
> 4 1.12 us 354 ns 279 ns ffff9d5e841ca800 &kmalloc-cg-512 (mutex)
> 2 859 ns 617 ns 429 ns ffffffffa41c3620 delayed_uprobe_lock (mutex)
> 3 691 ns 388 ns 230 ns ffffffffa41c0940 pack_mutex (mutex)
> 3 421 ns 164 ns 140 ns ffffffffa3a8b3a0 text_mutex (mutex)
> 1 409 ns 409 ns 409 ns ffffffffa41b4cf8 tracepoint_srcu_srcu_usage (mutex)
> 2 362 ns 239 ns 181 ns ffffffffa41cf840 pcpu_alloc_mutex (mutex)
> 1 220 ns 220 ns 220 ns ffff9d5e82b534d8 &signal_cache (mutex)
> 1 215 ns 215 ns 215 ns ffffffffa41b4c28 tracepoint_srcu_srcu_usage (mutex)
>
> The first two were from "task_struct" slab cache. It happened to
> match with the type name of object but there's no guarantee. We need
> to add type info to slab cache to resolve the lock inside the object.
> Anyway, the third one has no dedicated slab cache and was allocated by
> kmalloc.
>
> Those slab objects can be used to filter specific locks using -L or
> --lock-filter option. (It needs quotes to avoid special handling in
> the shell).
>
> # perf lock con -ab -L '&task_struct' sleep 1
> contended total wait max wait avg wait type caller
>
> 1 25.10 us 25.10 us 25.10 us mutex perf_event_exit_task+0x39
> 1 21.60 us 21.60 us 21.60 us mutex futex_exit_release+0x21
> 1 5.56 us 5.56 us 5.56 us mutex futex_exec_release+0x21
>
> The code is available at 'perf/lock-slab-v3' branch in my tree
>
> git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/namhyung/linux-perf.git
>
> Thanks,
> Namhyung
>
>
> Namhyung Kim (4):
> perf lock contention: Add and use LCB_F_TYPE_MASK
> perf lock contention: Run BPF slab cache iterator
> perf lock contention: Resolve slab object name using BPF
> perf lock contention: Handle slab objects in -L/--lock-filter option
>
> tools/perf/builtin-lock.c | 39 ++++-
> tools/perf/util/bpf_lock_contention.c | 140 +++++++++++++++++-
> .../perf/util/bpf_skel/lock_contention.bpf.c | 95 +++++++++++-
> tools/perf/util/bpf_skel/lock_data.h | 15 +-
> tools/perf/util/bpf_skel/vmlinux/vmlinux.h | 8 +
> tools/perf/util/lock-contention.h | 2 +
> 6 files changed, 292 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
>
> --
> 2.47.1.613.gc27f4b7a9f-goog
prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-12-20 19:20 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-12-20 6:00 [PATCH v3 0/4] perf lock contention: Symbolize locks using slab cache names Namhyung Kim
2024-12-20 6:00 ` [PATCH v3 1/4] perf lock contention: Add and use LCB_F_TYPE_MASK Namhyung Kim
2024-12-20 6:00 ` [PATCH v3 2/4] perf lock contention: Run BPF slab cache iterator Namhyung Kim
2024-12-20 23:52 ` Alexei Starovoitov
2024-12-21 23:55 ` Namhyung Kim
2024-12-23 16:38 ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2024-12-20 6:00 ` [PATCH v3 3/4] perf lock contention: Resolve slab object name using BPF Namhyung Kim
2024-12-20 6:00 ` [PATCH v3 4/4] perf lock contention: Handle slab objects in -L/--lock-filter option Namhyung Kim
2024-12-20 19:20 ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=Z2XDhXZsfUVtU7MY@x1 \
--to=acme@kernel.org \
--cc=42.hyeyoo@gmail.com \
--cc=adrian.hunter@intel.com \
--cc=andrii@kernel.org \
--cc=bpf@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=ctshao@google.com \
--cc=eranian@google.com \
--cc=irogers@google.com \
--cc=jolsa@kernel.org \
--cc=kan.liang@linux.intel.com \
--cc=kees@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-perf-users@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@kernel.org \
--cc=namhyung@kernel.org \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=roman.gushchin@linux.dev \
--cc=song@kernel.org \
--cc=vbabka@suse.cz \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox