From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from smtp.kernel.org (aws-us-west-2-korg-mail-1.web.codeaurora.org [10.30.226.201]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 18251203707; Wed, 8 Jan 2025 20:31:46 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=10.30.226.201 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1736368307; cv=none; b=b7tgXPM9r0VHFrt0hjqali7hffKtp3ujKuIwUXv6uwbhvywR2rPa4Y4ILHO3QgknSb3a4lhgByAMLZ8grPLPQ3JDh7fuFw6+oHEHglIPiEsTlH5aXfR7Qg4gXUbYhfZTI17pvlDzni0OJHvMl6a++2JA4aWdj/Syn8H9qopL6MM= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1736368307; c=relaxed/simple; bh=b29+CF/PEz/b1hsWXXJGiMw8nBb5RF/311tTzXLN0JU=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:References:MIME-Version: Content-Type:Content-Disposition:In-Reply-To; b=CWeXHDayf7N3WU/K9nr/W9QNAsvH+KhkTipFRskr1f4mH1RU3XdirXaWLUpYAlzOoAegHDGEksEVK80p5Ayv7GlE6E3QRyX3X2+eRwexe0EF3ygqPtXoR6TTSh1Ua8f1IJJYOyHGmTrnnN/FEi2btbhcFi5fACdzR/+XaxGfA74= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b=V5WYarDd; arc=none smtp.client-ip=10.30.226.201 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b="V5WYarDd" Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 04F2CC4CED3; Wed, 8 Jan 2025 20:31:45 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=k20201202; t=1736368306; bh=b29+CF/PEz/b1hsWXXJGiMw8nBb5RF/311tTzXLN0JU=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:References:In-Reply-To:From; b=V5WYarDdeFWEAEde2Sexunsqtq+GuQ3Qy+qK04r64kXZOH8rSA7eti6eyeLmfiFfB Bki/SYuapvcligSS6YWbNNkjpQGtyKey4rSl7wS3VX5YBVDeVJCKRkPpkL160OxtJT DqQq2+1hRZe1vWiYjjedBg+YMtAXSeqE0p1SsKuzRwwAyrgLrwI7WMDYTVItxucMpr esXdCjWrMFQuqBuoP9X6rQ/Azoy6Tql7XKWdRK5LEvkPWvNQV39LWX3yYXXO4vJGQ8 0HPoKvLdvwoh/ReZ50+8y1RdmI4zvKOprjjw7yv6zr+pkIJfBm+OIPIWbYwZASi0fi bRpqJ+Qq4BOXA== Date: Wed, 8 Jan 2025 17:31:43 -0300 From: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo To: Stephane Eranian , Yonatan Goldschmidt Cc: Francesco Nigro , Ilan Green , Namhyung Kim , Ingo Molnar , Thomas Gleixner , James Clark , Jiri Olsa , Ian Rogers , Adrian Hunter , Kan Liang , Clark Williams , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-perf-users@vger.kernel.org, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/5 v1] Processing java JIT dumps from containers Message-ID: References: <20241206204828.507527-1-acme@kernel.org> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-perf-users@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: On Mon, Dec 23, 2024 at 04:51:49PM -0300, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo wrote: > On Fri, Dec 06, 2024 at 05:48:23PM -0300, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo wrote: > > From: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo > > > Hi, > > > > This is trying to move the needle on supporting jitdump done > > from a container while perf is running from the outside, that is not > > working right now. > > > > I tried to collect as much details on what is being done in the > > commit logs to document further work that needs to be done to support > > such a scenario in a streamlined way, but what in this patchkit at least > > helped in a real case, allowing us to get 'perf annotate' to work and > > confirm suspicions. > > I'm going to apply this to perf-tools-next, please holler if you > disagree. Applied. - Arnaldo