Re: [PATCH v2] tools: perf: tests: Fix code reading for riscv

[Charlie Jenkins <charlie@rivosinc.com>]

On Fri, Jan 03, 2025 at 01:51:59PM -0300, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 02, 2025 at 05:44:56PM -0800, Charlie Jenkins wrote:
> > On Wed, Dec 18, 2024 at 05:52:24PM -0800, Charlie Jenkins wrote:
> > > On Wed, Dec 18, 2024 at 05:20:15PM -0800, Ian Rogers wrote:
> > > Yeah I agree. This test case did end up being interesting though as it
> > > unconvered this change in behavior of objdump on riscv, but that's
> > > tangential to the purpose of this test case. We need this patch on riscv
> > > to stop this test from failing, but it is also reasonable to approach
> > > this differently and not use objdump at all.
>  
> > What's the next step here? Would you prefer to get rid of this test
> > entirely? I sent out a v3 that uses uname [1].
>  
> > Link
> > https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20241219-perf_fix_riscv_obj_reading-v3-1-a7d644dcfa50@rivosinc.com/
> > [1]
> 
> I'm ok with this latest version and added it to perf-tools-next,
> changing the patch subject line to:
> 
>   perf tests code-reading: Handle change in objdump output from binutils >= 2.41 on riscv
> 
> Ok?

Yes that is perfect, thank you!

- Charlie

> 
> - Arnaldo