[PATCH 1/2] perf ftrace: Check min/max latency only with bucket range

[PATCH 1/2] perf ftrace: Check min/max latency only with bucket range

[Namhyung Kim]

It's an optional feature and remains 0 when bucket range is not given.
And it makes the histogram goes to the last entry always because any
latency (num) is greater than or equal to 0.

Before:
  $ sudo ./perf ftrace latency -a -T do_futex sleep 1
  #   DURATION     |      COUNT | GRAPH                                          |
       0 -    0 us |          0 |                                                |
       1 -    2 us |          0 |                                                |
       2 -    4 us |          0 |                                                |
       4 -    8 us |          0 |                                                |
       8 -   16 us |          0 |                                                |
      16 -   32 us |          0 |                                                |
      32 -   64 us |          0 |                                                |
      64 -  128 us |          0 |                                                |
     128 -  256 us |          0 |                                                |
     256 -  512 us |          0 |                                                |
     512 - 1024 us |          0 |                                                |
       1 -    2 ms |          0 |                                                |
       2 -    4 ms |          0 |                                                |
       4 -    8 ms |          0 |                                                |
       8 -   16 ms |          0 |                                                |
      16 -   32 ms |          0 |                                                |
      32 -   64 ms |          0 |                                                |
      64 -  128 ms |          0 |                                                |
     128 -  256 ms |          0 |                                                |
     256 -  512 ms |          0 |                                                |
     512 - 1024 ms |          0 |                                                |
       1 - ...  s  |       1353 | ############################################## |

After:
  $ sudo ./perf ftrace latency -a -T do_futex sleep 1
  #   DURATION     |      COUNT | GRAPH                                          |
       0 -    0 us |        321 | ###########                                    |
       1 -    2 us |        132 | ####                                           |
       2 -    4 us |        202 | #######                                        |
       4 -    8 us |        188 | ######                                         |
       8 -   16 us |         16 |                                                |
      16 -   32 us |         12 |                                                |
      32 -   64 us |         30 | #                                              |
      64 -  128 us |         98 | ###                                            |
     128 -  256 us |         53 | #                                              |
     256 -  512 us |         57 | ##                                             |
     512 - 1024 us |          9 |                                                |
       1 -    2 ms |          9 |                                                |
       2 -    4 ms |          1 |                                                |
       4 -    8 ms |         98 | ###                                            |
       8 -   16 ms |          5 |                                                |
      16 -   32 ms |          7 |                                                |
      32 -   64 ms |         32 | #                                              |
      64 -  128 ms |         10 |                                                |
     128 -  256 ms |         10 |                                                |
     256 -  512 ms |          2 |                                                |
     512 - 1024 ms |          0 |                                                |
       1 - ...  s  |          0 |                                                |

Fixes: 690a052a6d85c530 ("perf ftrace latency: Add --max-latency option")
Cc: Gabriele Monaco <gmonaco@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Namhyung Kim <namhyung@kernel.org>
---
 tools/perf/builtin-ftrace.c | 8 +++++---
 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)

diff --git a/tools/perf/builtin-ftrace.c b/tools/perf/builtin-ftrace.c
index 08c1cc429b27e169..90cf2c9915a7e35b 100644
--- a/tools/perf/builtin-ftrace.c
+++ b/tools/perf/builtin-ftrace.c
@@ -796,8 +796,10 @@ static void make_histogram(struct perf_ftrace *ftrace, int buckets[],
 			// than the min latency desired.
 			if (num > 0) // 1st entry: [ 1 unit .. bucket_range units ]
 				i = num / ftrace->bucket_range + 1;
+			if (num >= max_latency - min_latency)
+				i = NUM_BUCKET -1;
 		}
-		if (i >= NUM_BUCKET || num >= max_latency - min_latency)
+		if (i >= NUM_BUCKET)
 			i = NUM_BUCKET - 1;
 
 		num += min_latency;
@@ -1738,7 +1740,7 @@ int cmd_ftrace(int argc, const char **argv)
 			ret = -EINVAL;
 			goto out_delete_filters;
 		}
-		if (!ftrace.min_latency) {
+		if (ftrace.bucket_range && !ftrace.min_latency) {
 			/* default min latency should be the bucket range */
 			ftrace.min_latency = ftrace.bucket_range;
 		}
@@ -1749,7 +1751,7 @@ int cmd_ftrace(int argc, const char **argv)
 			ret = -EINVAL;
 			goto out_delete_filters;
 		}
-		if (!ftrace.max_latency) {
+		if (ftrace.bucket_range && !ftrace.max_latency) {
 			/* default max latency should depend on bucket range and num_buckets */
 			ftrace.max_latency = (NUM_BUCKET - 2) * ftrace.bucket_range +
 						ftrace.min_latency;
-- 
2.47.1.613.gc27f4b7a9f-goog

[PATCH 2/2] perf ftrace: Fix display for range of the first bucket

[Namhyung Kim]

When min_latency is not given, it prints 0 - 0.  It should be 0 - 1.

Before:
  $ sudo ./perf ftrace latency -a -T do_futex sleep 1
  #   DURATION     |      COUNT | GRAPH                                          |
       0 -    0 us |        321 | ###########                                    |
  ...

After:
  $ sudo ./perf ftrace latency -a -T do_futex sleep 1
  #   DURATION     |      COUNT | GRAPH                                          |
       0 -    1 us |        699 | ############                                   |
  ...

Fixes: b875b6bf608589 ("perf ftrace latency: Introduce --min-latency to narrow down into a latency range")
Cc: Gabriele Monaco <gmonaco@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Namhyung Kim <namhyung@kernel.org>
---
 tools/perf/builtin-ftrace.c | 2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/tools/perf/builtin-ftrace.c b/tools/perf/builtin-ftrace.c
index 90cf2c9915a7e35b..cfd770ec72867d77 100644
--- a/tools/perf/builtin-ftrace.c
+++ b/tools/perf/builtin-ftrace.c
@@ -840,7 +840,7 @@ static void display_histogram(struct perf_ftrace *ftrace, int buckets[])
 	bar_len = buckets[0] * bar_total / total;
 
 	printf("  %4d - %4d %s | %10d | %.*s%*s |\n",
-	       0, min_latency, use_nsec ? "ns" : "us",
+	       0, min_latency ?: 1, use_nsec ? "ns" : "us",
 	       buckets[0], bar_len, bar, bar_total - bar_len, "");
 
 	for (i = 1; i < NUM_BUCKET - 1; i++) {
-- 
2.47.1.613.gc27f4b7a9f-goog

Re: [PATCH 2/2] perf ftrace: Fix display for range of the first bucket

[Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo]

On Wed, Jan 08, 2025 at 01:00:15PM -0800, Namhyung Kim wrote:
> When min_latency is not given, it prints 0 - 0.  It should be 0 - 1.
> 
> Before:
>   $ sudo ./perf ftrace latency -a -T do_futex sleep 1
>   #   DURATION     |      COUNT | GRAPH                                          |
>        0 -    0 us |        321 | ###########                                    |
>   ...
> 
> After:
>   $ sudo ./perf ftrace latency -a -T do_futex sleep 1
>   #   DURATION     |      COUNT | GRAPH                                          |
>        0 -    1 us |        699 | ############                                   |
>   ...
> 
> Fixes: b875b6bf608589 ("perf ftrace latency: Introduce --min-latency to narrow down into a latency range")

I couldn't find the above cset in perf-tools not perf-tools-next nor in
upstream, I fixed it up to:

Fixes: 08b875b6bf608589 ("perf ftrace latency: Introduce --min-latency to narrow down into a latency range")

Thanks,

- Arnaldo

> Cc: Gabriele Monaco <gmonaco@redhat.com>
> Signed-off-by: Namhyung Kim <namhyung@kernel.org>
> ---
>  tools/perf/builtin-ftrace.c | 2 +-
>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 
> diff --git a/tools/perf/builtin-ftrace.c b/tools/perf/builtin-ftrace.c
> index 90cf2c9915a7e35b..cfd770ec72867d77 100644
> --- a/tools/perf/builtin-ftrace.c
> +++ b/tools/perf/builtin-ftrace.c
> @@ -840,7 +840,7 @@ static void display_histogram(struct perf_ftrace *ftrace, int buckets[])
>  	bar_len = buckets[0] * bar_total / total;
>  
>  	printf("  %4d - %4d %s | %10d | %.*s%*s |\n",
> -	       0, min_latency, use_nsec ? "ns" : "us",
> +	       0, min_latency ?: 1, use_nsec ? "ns" : "us",
>  	       buckets[0], bar_len, bar, bar_total - bar_len, "");
>  
>  	for (i = 1; i < NUM_BUCKET - 1; i++) {
> -- 
> 2.47.1.613.gc27f4b7a9f-goog

Re: [PATCH 2/2] perf ftrace: Fix display for range of the first bucket

[Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo]

On Fri, Jan 10, 2025 at 11:08:48AM -0300, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 08, 2025 at 01:00:15PM -0800, Namhyung Kim wrote:
> > When min_latency is not given, it prints 0 - 0.  It should be 0 - 1.
> > 
> > Before:
> >   $ sudo ./perf ftrace latency -a -T do_futex sleep 1
> >   #   DURATION     |      COUNT | GRAPH                                          |
> >        0 -    0 us |        321 | ###########                                    |
> >   ...
> > 
> > After:
> >   $ sudo ./perf ftrace latency -a -T do_futex sleep 1
> >   #   DURATION     |      COUNT | GRAPH                                          |
> >        0 -    1 us |        699 | ############                                   |
> >   ...
> > 
> > Fixes: b875b6bf608589 ("perf ftrace latency: Introduce --min-latency to narrow down into a latency range")
> 
> I couldn't find the above cset in perf-tools not perf-tools-next nor in
> upstream, I fixed it up to:

It is just in perf-tools-next, so probably I did some rebase and that
explains this. Anyway, that should be stable now.

- Arnaldo
 
> Fixes: 08b875b6bf608589 ("perf ftrace latency: Introduce --min-latency to narrow down into a latency range")
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> - Arnaldo
> 
> > Cc: Gabriele Monaco <gmonaco@redhat.com>
> > Signed-off-by: Namhyung Kim <namhyung@kernel.org>
> > ---
> >  tools/perf/builtin-ftrace.c | 2 +-
> >  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> > 
> > diff --git a/tools/perf/builtin-ftrace.c b/tools/perf/builtin-ftrace.c
> > index 90cf2c9915a7e35b..cfd770ec72867d77 100644
> > --- a/tools/perf/builtin-ftrace.c
> > +++ b/tools/perf/builtin-ftrace.c
> > @@ -840,7 +840,7 @@ static void display_histogram(struct perf_ftrace *ftrace, int buckets[])
> >  	bar_len = buckets[0] * bar_total / total;
> >  
> >  	printf("  %4d - %4d %s | %10d | %.*s%*s |\n",
> > -	       0, min_latency, use_nsec ? "ns" : "us",
> > +	       0, min_latency ?: 1, use_nsec ? "ns" : "us",
> >  	       buckets[0], bar_len, bar, bar_total - bar_len, "");
> >  
> >  	for (i = 1; i < NUM_BUCKET - 1; i++) {
> > -- 
> > 2.47.1.613.gc27f4b7a9f-goog

Re: [PATCH 1/2] perf ftrace: Check min/max latency only with bucket range

[Gabriele Monaco]

On Wed, 2025-01-08 at 13:00 -0800, Namhyung Kim wrote:
> It's an optional feature and remains 0 when bucket range is not
> given.
> And it makes the histogram goes to the last entry always because any
> latency (num) is greater than or equal to 0.

Thanks Namhyung for fixing this, something definitely slipped while
testing..

I confirm your patches work well also when the bucket range is provided but the
min latency isn't.

I'm wondering if it would be cleaner to propagate your changes (using
min/max latency only if bucket_range is provided) also to
make_histogram. That function currently works since we assume
min_latency to be always 0, which is the case but probably not
considering it altogether would look a bit better and prevent some
headache in the future.

---
 tools/perf/builtin-ftrace.c | 13 +++++--------
 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)

diff --git a/tools/perf/builtin-ftrace.c b/tools/perf/builtin-ftrace.c
index 076c703e5c334..82d63d7af9d03 100644
--- a/tools/perf/builtin-ftrace.c
+++ b/tools/perf/builtin-ftrace.c
@@ -779,19 +779,16 @@ static void make_histogram(struct perf_ftrace *ftrace, int buckets[],
 		if (ftrace->use_nsec)
 			num *= 1000;
 
-		i = 0;
-		if (num < min_latency)
-			goto do_inc;
-
-		num -= min_latency;
-
 		if (!ftrace->bucket_range) {
 			i = log2(num);
 			if (i < 0)
 				i = 0;
 		} else {
-			// Less than 1 unit (ms or ns), or, in the future,
-			// than the min latency desired.
+			i = 0;
+			if (num < min_latency)
+				goto do_inc;
+
+			num -= min_latency;
 			if (num > 0) // 1st entry: [ 1 unit .. bucket_range units ]
 				i = num / ftrace->bucket_range + 1;
 			if (num >= max_latency - min_latency)

base-commit: 257ccfaf9fbef6f54eabf1a8f8a8efcc9036439b
-- 
2.47.1

Re: [PATCH 1/2] perf ftrace: Check min/max latency only with bucket range

[Namhyung Kim]

On Thu, Jan 09, 2025 at 08:53:02AM +0100, Gabriele Monaco wrote:
> On Wed, 2025-01-08 at 13:00 -0800, Namhyung Kim wrote:
> > It's an optional feature and remains 0 when bucket range is not
> > given.
> > And it makes the histogram goes to the last entry always because any
> > latency (num) is greater than or equal to 0.
> 
> Thanks Namhyung for fixing this, something definitely slipped while
> testing..
> 
> I confirm your patches work well also when the bucket range is provided but the
> min latency isn't.
> 
> I'm wondering if it would be cleaner to propagate your changes (using
> min/max latency only if bucket_range is provided) also to
> make_histogram. That function currently works since we assume
> min_latency to be always 0, which is the case but probably not
> considering it altogether would look a bit better and prevent some
> headache in the future.

It looks good.  One thing I concern is 'num += min_latency' before
do_inc.  I put it there to make it symmetric to 'num -= min_latency'
so it should go to inside the block too.

Or you could factor it out as a function like 'i = get_bucket_index(num)'
so that it can keep the original num for the stats.

Thanks,
Namhyung

> 
> ---
>  tools/perf/builtin-ftrace.c | 13 +++++--------
>  1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/tools/perf/builtin-ftrace.c b/tools/perf/builtin-ftrace.c
> index 076c703e5c334..82d63d7af9d03 100644
> --- a/tools/perf/builtin-ftrace.c
> +++ b/tools/perf/builtin-ftrace.c
> @@ -779,19 +779,16 @@ static void make_histogram(struct perf_ftrace *ftrace, int buckets[],
>  		if (ftrace->use_nsec)
>  			num *= 1000;
>  
> -		i = 0;
> -		if (num < min_latency)
> -			goto do_inc;
> -
> -		num -= min_latency;
> -
>  		if (!ftrace->bucket_range) {
>  			i = log2(num);
>  			if (i < 0)
>  				i = 0;
>  		} else {
> -			// Less than 1 unit (ms or ns), or, in the future,
> -			// than the min latency desired.
> +			i = 0;
> +			if (num < min_latency)
> +				goto do_inc;
> +
> +			num -= min_latency;
>  			if (num > 0) // 1st entry: [ 1 unit .. bucket_range units ]
>  				i = num / ftrace->bucket_range + 1;
>  			if (num >= max_latency - min_latency)
> 
> base-commit: 257ccfaf9fbef6f54eabf1a8f8a8efcc9036439b
> -- 
> 2.47.1
> 

Re: [PATCH 1/2] perf ftrace: Check min/max latency only with bucket range

[Gabriele Monaco]

2025-01-10T00:46:49Z Namhyung Kim <namhyung@kernel.org>:

> On Thu, Jan 09, 2025 at 08:53:02AM +0100, Gabriele Monaco wrote:
>> On Wed, 2025-01-08 at 13:00 -0800, Namhyung Kim wrote:
>>> It's an optional feature and remains 0 when bucket range is not
>>> given.
>>> And it makes the histogram goes to the last entry always because any
>>> latency (num) is greater than or equal to 0.
>>
>> Thanks Namhyung for fixing this, something definitely slipped while
>> testing..
>>
>> I confirm your patches work well also when the bucket range is provided but the
>> min latency isn't.
>>
>> I'm wondering if it would be cleaner to propagate your changes (using
>> min/max latency only if bucket_range is provided) also to
>> make_histogram. That function currently works since we assume
>> min_latency to be always 0, which is the case but probably not
>> considering it altogether would look a bit better and prevent some
>> headache in the future.
>
> It looks good.  One thing I concern is 'num += min_latency' before
> do_inc.  I put it there to make it symmetric to 'num -= min_latency'
> so it should go to inside the block too.
>
> Or you could factor it out as a function like 'i = get_bucket_index(num)'
> so that it can keep the original num for the stats.
>

Good point, I can have a deeper look at that. But I'd say it can come as a cleanup patch later.
I have a couple more changes in mind and this would be no longer related to your changes.

Thanks,
Gabriele

Re: [PATCH 1/2] perf ftrace: Check min/max latency only with bucket range

[Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo]

On Fri, Jan 10, 2025 at 10:09:14AM +0000, Gabriele Monaco wrote:
> 2025-01-10T00:46:49Z Namhyung Kim <namhyung@kernel.org>:
> 
> > On Thu, Jan 09, 2025 at 08:53:02AM +0100, Gabriele Monaco wrote:
> >> On Wed, 2025-01-08 at 13:00 -0800, Namhyung Kim wrote:
> >>> It's an optional feature and remains 0 when bucket range is not
> >>> given.
> >>> And it makes the histogram goes to the last entry always because any
> >>> latency (num) is greater than or equal to 0.
> >>
> >> Thanks Namhyung for fixing this, something definitely slipped while
> >> testing..
> >>
> >> I confirm your patches work well also when the bucket range is provided but the
> >> min latency isn't.
> >>
> >> I'm wondering if it would be cleaner to propagate your changes (using
> >> min/max latency only if bucket_range is provided) also to
> >> make_histogram. That function currently works since we assume
> >> min_latency to be always 0, which is the case but probably not
> >> considering it altogether would look a bit better and prevent some
> >> headache in the future.
> >
> > It looks good.  One thing I concern is 'num += min_latency' before
> > do_inc.  I put it there to make it symmetric to 'num -= min_latency'
> > so it should go to inside the block too.
> >
> > Or you could factor it out as a function like 'i = get_bucket_index(num)'
> > so that it can keep the original num for the stats.
> >
> 
> Good point, I can have a deeper look at that. But I'd say it can come as a cleanup patch later.
> I have a couple more changes in mind and this would be no longer related to your changes.

I'm tentatively taking this as an:

Acked-by: Gabriele Monaco <gmonaco@redhat.com>

But it would be great to have it as a Reviewed-by and perhaps a
Tested-by, provided explicitely in response to this thread, ok?

Thanks,

- Arnaldo

Re: [PATCH 1/2] perf ftrace: Check min/max latency only with bucket range

[Gabriele Monaco]

On Fri, 2025-01-10 at 11:03 -0300, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo wrote:
> On Fri, Jan 10, 2025 at 10:09:14AM +0000, Gabriele Monaco wrote:
> > 2025-01-10T00:46:49Z Namhyung Kim <namhyung@kernel.org>:
> > 
> > > On Thu, Jan 09, 2025 at 08:53:02AM +0100, Gabriele Monaco wrote:
> > > > On Wed, 2025-01-08 at 13:00 -0800, Namhyung Kim wrote:
> > > > > It's an optional feature and remains 0 when bucket range is
> > > > > not
> > > > > given.
> > > > > And it makes the histogram goes to the last entry always
> > > > > because any
> > > > > latency (num) is greater than or equal to 0.
> > > > 
> > > > Thanks Namhyung for fixing this, something definitely slipped
> > > > while
> > > > testing..
> > > > 
> > > > I confirm your patches work well also when the bucket range is
> > > > provided but the
> > > > min latency isn't.
> > > > 
> > > > I'm wondering if it would be cleaner to propagate your changes
> > > > (using
> > > > min/max latency only if bucket_range is provided) also to
> > > > make_histogram. That function currently works since we assume
> > > > min_latency to be always 0, which is the case but probably not
> > > > considering it altogether would look a bit better and prevent
> > > > some
> > > > headache in the future.
> > > 
> > > It looks good.  One thing I concern is 'num += min_latency'
> > > before
> > > do_inc.  I put it there to make it symmetric to 'num -=
> > > min_latency'
> > > so it should go to inside the block too.
> > > 
> > > Or you could factor it out as a function like 'i =
> > > get_bucket_index(num)'
> > > so that it can keep the original num for the stats.
> > > 
> > 
> > Good point, I can have a deeper look at that. But I'd say it can
> > come as a cleanup patch later.
> > I have a couple more changes in mind and this would be no longer
> > related to your changes.
> 
> I'm tentatively taking this as an:
> 
> Acked-by: Gabriele Monaco <gmonaco@redhat.com>
> 
> But it would be great to have it as a Reviewed-by and perhaps a
> Tested-by, provided explicitely in response to this thread, ok?
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> - Arnaldo
> 

I did test after applying both patches, went through the code and
confirm my test worked as expected, and I confirm the issue is there
before patching. I tested also in between, so feel free to add to both
patches:

Reviewed-by: Gabriele Monaco <gmonaco@redhat.com>
Tested-by: Gabriele Monaco <gmonaco@redhat.com>

(I'm assuming you are referring to 1/2 and 2/2 and not the little patch
I sent in the first answer)

Thanks,
Gabriele

Re: [PATCH 1/2] perf ftrace: Check min/max latency only with bucket range

[Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo]

On Fri, Jan 10, 2025 at 04:11:05PM +0100, Gabriele Monaco wrote:
> 
> On Fri, 2025-01-10 at 11:03 -0300, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo wrote:
> > On Fri, Jan 10, 2025 at 10:09:14AM +0000, Gabriele Monaco wrote:
> > > 2025-01-10T00:46:49Z Namhyung Kim <namhyung@kernel.org>:
> > > 
> > > > On Thu, Jan 09, 2025 at 08:53:02AM +0100, Gabriele Monaco wrote:
> > > > > On Wed, 2025-01-08 at 13:00 -0800, Namhyung Kim wrote:
> > > > > > It's an optional feature and remains 0 when bucket range is
> > > > > > not
> > > > > > given.
> > > > > > And it makes the histogram goes to the last entry always
> > > > > > because any
> > > > > > latency (num) is greater than or equal to 0.
> > > > > 
> > > > > Thanks Namhyung for fixing this, something definitely slipped
> > > > > while
> > > > > testing..
> > > > > 
> > > > > I confirm your patches work well also when the bucket range is
> > > > > provided but the
> > > > > min latency isn't.
> > > > > 
> > > > > I'm wondering if it would be cleaner to propagate your changes
> > > > > (using
> > > > > min/max latency only if bucket_range is provided) also to
> > > > > make_histogram. That function currently works since we assume
> > > > > min_latency to be always 0, which is the case but probably not
> > > > > considering it altogether would look a bit better and prevent
> > > > > some
> > > > > headache in the future.
> > > > 
> > > > It looks good.  One thing I concern is 'num += min_latency'
> > > > before
> > > > do_inc.  I put it there to make it symmetric to 'num -=
> > > > min_latency'
> > > > so it should go to inside the block too.
> > > > 
> > > > Or you could factor it out as a function like 'i =
> > > > get_bucket_index(num)'
> > > > so that it can keep the original num for the stats.
> > > > 
> > > 
> > > Good point, I can have a deeper look at that. But I'd say it can
> > > come as a cleanup patch later.
> > > I have a couple more changes in mind and this would be no longer
> > > related to your changes.
> > 
> > I'm tentatively taking this as an:
> > 
> > Acked-by: Gabriele Monaco <gmonaco@redhat.com>
> > 
> > But it would be great to have it as a Reviewed-by and perhaps a
> > Tested-by, provided explicitely in response to this thread, ok?
> > 
> > Thanks,
> > 
> > - Arnaldo
> > 
> 
> I did test after applying both patches, went through the code and
> confirm my test worked as expected, and I confirm the issue is there
> before patching. I tested also in between, so feel free to add to both
> patches:
> 
> Reviewed-by: Gabriele Monaco <gmonaco@redhat.com>
> Tested-by: Gabriele Monaco <gmonaco@redhat.com>

Thanks, added.
 
> (I'm assuming you are referring to 1/2 and 2/2 and not the little patch

Yeah, Namhyung's 1/2 and 2/2 patches, these:

https://lore.kernel.org/r/20250108210015.1188531-1-namhyung@kernel.org
https://lore.kernel.org/r/20250108210015.1188531-2-namhyung@kernel.org

- Arnaldo

> I sent in the first answer)
> 
> Thanks,
> Gabriele