* [PATCH] perf probe: Introduce --no-advice option when a new event is created @ 2024-12-14 19:34 Aaron Tomlin 2025-01-24 0:25 ` Namhyung Kim 0 siblings, 1 reply; 8+ messages in thread From: Aaron Tomlin @ 2024-12-14 19:34 UTC (permalink / raw) To: peterz, mingo, acme, namhyung, mark.rutland, alexander.shishkin, jolsa, irogers, adrian.hunter, kan.liang Cc: linux-perf-users, linux-kernel, atomlin This patch introduces a new option namely "--no-advice" to be used with the add command. Now one has the ability to avoid the generation of any advice when a new event is created. Thus making the output reasonable. For example: # perf probe --no-advice --add 'user_path_at%return return=$retval:s32' Added new event: probe:user_path_at__return (on user_path_at%return with return=$retval:s32) # Signed-off-by: Aaron Tomlin <atomlin@atomlin.com> --- tools/perf/builtin-probe.c | 4 +++- tools/perf/util/probe-event.h | 1 + 2 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/tools/perf/builtin-probe.c b/tools/perf/builtin-probe.c index 69800e4d9530..36b8e08f3725 100644 --- a/tools/perf/builtin-probe.c +++ b/tools/perf/builtin-probe.c @@ -391,7 +391,7 @@ static int perf_add_probe_events(struct perf_probe_event *pevs, int npevs) } /* Note that it is possible to skip all events because of blacklist */ - if (event) { + if (event && !probe_conf.no_advice) { #ifndef HAVE_LIBTRACEEVENT pr_info("\nperf is not linked with libtraceevent, to use the new probe you can use tracefs:\n\n"); pr_info("\tcd /sys/kernel/tracing/\n"); @@ -577,6 +577,8 @@ __cmd_probe(int argc, const char **argv) "directory", "path to kernel source"), OPT_BOOLEAN('\0', "no-inlines", &probe_conf.no_inlines, "Don't search inlined functions"), + OPT_BOOLEAN('\0', "no-advice", &probe_conf.no_advice, + "Don't provide any advice after a new event is created."), OPT__DRY_RUN(&probe_event_dry_run), OPT_INTEGER('\0', "max-probes", &probe_conf.max_probes, "Set how many probe points can be found for a probe."), diff --git a/tools/perf/util/probe-event.h b/tools/perf/util/probe-event.h index 61a5f4ff4e9c..be0dce26e133 100644 --- a/tools/perf/util/probe-event.h +++ b/tools/perf/util/probe-event.h @@ -14,6 +14,7 @@ struct probe_conf { bool show_location_range; bool force_add; bool no_inlines; + bool no_advice; bool cache; bool bootconfig; int max_probes; -- 2.47.1 ^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] perf probe: Introduce --no-advice option when a new event is created 2024-12-14 19:34 [PATCH] perf probe: Introduce --no-advice option when a new event is created Aaron Tomlin @ 2025-01-24 0:25 ` Namhyung Kim 2025-01-24 10:54 ` Aaron Tomlin 0 siblings, 1 reply; 8+ messages in thread From: Namhyung Kim @ 2025-01-24 0:25 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Aaron Tomlin Cc: peterz, mingo, acme, mark.rutland, alexander.shishkin, jolsa, irogers, adrian.hunter, kan.liang, linux-perf-users, linux-kernel Hello, Sorry for the late reply. On Sat, Dec 14, 2024 at 07:34:52PM +0000, Aaron Tomlin wrote: > This patch introduces a new option namely "--no-advice" to be used with > the add command. Now one has the ability to avoid the generation of any > advice when a new event is created. Thus making the output reasonable. > For example: > > # perf probe --no-advice --add 'user_path_at%return return=$retval:s32' > Added new event: > probe:user_path_at__return (on user_path_at%return with return=$retval:s32) > # Thanks for sending the patch but why do you care? You can just ignore the message. Thanks, Namhyung > > Signed-off-by: Aaron Tomlin <atomlin@atomlin.com> > --- > tools/perf/builtin-probe.c | 4 +++- > tools/perf/util/probe-event.h | 1 + > 2 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) > > diff --git a/tools/perf/builtin-probe.c b/tools/perf/builtin-probe.c > index 69800e4d9530..36b8e08f3725 100644 > --- a/tools/perf/builtin-probe.c > +++ b/tools/perf/builtin-probe.c > @@ -391,7 +391,7 @@ static int perf_add_probe_events(struct perf_probe_event *pevs, int npevs) > } > > /* Note that it is possible to skip all events because of blacklist */ > - if (event) { > + if (event && !probe_conf.no_advice) { > #ifndef HAVE_LIBTRACEEVENT > pr_info("\nperf is not linked with libtraceevent, to use the new probe you can use tracefs:\n\n"); > pr_info("\tcd /sys/kernel/tracing/\n"); > @@ -577,6 +577,8 @@ __cmd_probe(int argc, const char **argv) > "directory", "path to kernel source"), > OPT_BOOLEAN('\0', "no-inlines", &probe_conf.no_inlines, > "Don't search inlined functions"), > + OPT_BOOLEAN('\0', "no-advice", &probe_conf.no_advice, > + "Don't provide any advice after a new event is created."), > OPT__DRY_RUN(&probe_event_dry_run), > OPT_INTEGER('\0', "max-probes", &probe_conf.max_probes, > "Set how many probe points can be found for a probe."), > diff --git a/tools/perf/util/probe-event.h b/tools/perf/util/probe-event.h > index 61a5f4ff4e9c..be0dce26e133 100644 > --- a/tools/perf/util/probe-event.h > +++ b/tools/perf/util/probe-event.h > @@ -14,6 +14,7 @@ struct probe_conf { > bool show_location_range; > bool force_add; > bool no_inlines; > + bool no_advice; > bool cache; > bool bootconfig; > int max_probes; > -- > 2.47.1 > ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] perf probe: Introduce --no-advice option when a new event is created 2025-01-24 0:25 ` Namhyung Kim @ 2025-01-24 10:54 ` Aaron Tomlin 2025-01-24 17:37 ` Namhyung Kim [not found] ` <CA+JHD92anFo9rNOZ8NVyY4j23ukyWO-LRroHfUTnuOLnL-05-g@mail.gmail.com> 0 siblings, 2 replies; 8+ messages in thread From: Aaron Tomlin @ 2025-01-24 10:54 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Namhyung Kim Cc: peterz, mingo, acme, mark.rutland, alexander.shishkin, jolsa, irogers, adrian.hunter, kan.liang, linux-perf-users, linux-kernel On Thu, Jan 23, 2025 at 04:25:10PM -0800, Namhyung Kim wrote: > Hello, Hi Namhyung, > Sorry for the late reply. No problem at all. > On Sat, Dec 14, 2024 at 07:34:52PM +0000, Aaron Tomlin wrote: > > This patch introduces a new option namely "--no-advice" to be used with > > the add command. Now one has the ability to avoid the generation of any > > advice when a new event is created. Thus making the output reasonable. > > For example: > > > > # perf probe --no-advice --add 'user_path_at%return return=$retval:s32' > > Added new event: > > probe:user_path_at__return (on user_path_at%return with return=$retval:s32) > > # > > Thanks for sending the patch but why do you care? You can just ignore > the message. I understand. As a frequent and avid perf-probe user, I often only need to confirm the successful creation of a new event, ensuring its presence under /sys/kernel/debug/tracing/events/probes for subsequent use with Ftrace. The ability to suppress verbose output would be a valuable enhancement. Please let me know your thoughts. Kind regards, -- Aaron Tomlin ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] perf probe: Introduce --no-advice option when a new event is created 2025-01-24 10:54 ` Aaron Tomlin @ 2025-01-24 17:37 ` Namhyung Kim 2025-01-25 12:22 ` Aaron Tomlin ` (2 more replies) [not found] ` <CA+JHD92anFo9rNOZ8NVyY4j23ukyWO-LRroHfUTnuOLnL-05-g@mail.gmail.com> 1 sibling, 3 replies; 8+ messages in thread From: Namhyung Kim @ 2025-01-24 17:37 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Aaron Tomlin Cc: peterz, mingo, acme, mark.rutland, alexander.shishkin, jolsa, irogers, adrian.hunter, kan.liang, linux-perf-users, linux-kernel On Fri, Jan 24, 2025 at 10:54:04AM +0000, Aaron Tomlin wrote: > On Thu, Jan 23, 2025 at 04:25:10PM -0800, Namhyung Kim wrote: > > Hello, > > Hi Namhyung, > > > Sorry for the late reply. > > No problem at all. > > > On Sat, Dec 14, 2024 at 07:34:52PM +0000, Aaron Tomlin wrote: > > > This patch introduces a new option namely "--no-advice" to be used with > > > the add command. Now one has the ability to avoid the generation of any > > > advice when a new event is created. Thus making the output reasonable. > > > For example: > > > > > > # perf probe --no-advice --add 'user_path_at%return return=$retval:s32' > > > Added new event: > > > probe:user_path_at__return (on user_path_at%return with return=$retval:s32) > > > # > > > > Thanks for sending the patch but why do you care? You can just ignore > > the message. > > I understand. > > As a frequent and avid perf-probe user, I often only need to confirm the > successful creation of a new event, ensuring its presence under > /sys/kernel/debug/tracing/events/probes for subsequent use with Ftrace. > The ability to suppress verbose output would be a valuable enhancement. > > Please let me know your thoughts. Sounds like you may want -q option to suppress all output and check the exit code of the command. Thanks, Namhyung ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] perf probe: Introduce --no-advice option when a new event is created 2025-01-24 17:37 ` Namhyung Kim @ 2025-01-25 12:22 ` Aaron Tomlin 2025-03-23 18:39 ` [PATCH 0/1] perf probe: Extend the quiet option Aaron Tomlin 2025-03-23 18:39 ` [PATCH 1/1] " Aaron Tomlin 2 siblings, 0 replies; 8+ messages in thread From: Aaron Tomlin @ 2025-01-25 12:22 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Namhyung Kim Cc: peterz, mingo, acme, mark.rutland, alexander.shishkin, jolsa, irogers, adrian.hunter, kan.liang, linux-perf-users, linux-kernel On Fri, Jan 24, 2025 at 09:37:34AM -0800, Namhyung Kim wrote: > Sounds like you may want -q option to suppress all output and check the > exit code of the command. Hi Namhyung, I will prepare another patch. -- Aaron Tomlin ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread
* [PATCH 0/1] perf probe: Extend the quiet option 2025-01-24 17:37 ` Namhyung Kim 2025-01-25 12:22 ` Aaron Tomlin @ 2025-03-23 18:39 ` Aaron Tomlin 2025-03-23 18:39 ` [PATCH 1/1] " Aaron Tomlin 2 siblings, 0 replies; 8+ messages in thread From: Aaron Tomlin @ 2025-03-23 18:39 UTC (permalink / raw) To: namhyung Cc: arnaldo.melo, peterz, mingo, acme, mark.rutland, alexander.shishkin, jolsa, irogers, adrian.hunter, kan.liang, linux-perf-users, linux-kernel Hi Namhyung, Apologies for the delay. I suspect this is the idea you had in mind? Aaron Tomlin (1): perf probe: Extend the quiet option tools/perf/builtin-probe.c | 16 +++++++++++----- tools/perf/util/probe-event.h | 1 + 2 files changed, 12 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-) -- 2.47.1 ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread
* [PATCH 1/1] perf probe: Extend the quiet option 2025-01-24 17:37 ` Namhyung Kim 2025-01-25 12:22 ` Aaron Tomlin 2025-03-23 18:39 ` [PATCH 0/1] perf probe: Extend the quiet option Aaron Tomlin @ 2025-03-23 18:39 ` Aaron Tomlin 2 siblings, 0 replies; 8+ messages in thread From: Aaron Tomlin @ 2025-03-23 18:39 UTC (permalink / raw) To: namhyung Cc: arnaldo.melo, peterz, mingo, acme, mark.rutland, alexander.shishkin, jolsa, irogers, adrian.hunter, kan.liang, linux-perf-users, linux-kernel To provide a consistent and complete quiet mode, this patch expands the scope of the [-q|--quiet] option to suppress all informational messages, including those indicating successful event creation, in addition to the currently suppressed warnings and messages. For example: ❯ sudo ./perf probe --quiet --add proc_sys_open ❯ echo $? 0 Signed-off-by: Aaron Tomlin <atomlin@atomlin.com> --- tools/perf/builtin-probe.c | 16 +++++++++++----- tools/perf/util/probe-event.h | 1 + 2 files changed, 12 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-) diff --git a/tools/perf/builtin-probe.c b/tools/perf/builtin-probe.c index 69800e4d9530..aee756aad19d 100644 --- a/tools/perf/builtin-probe.c +++ b/tools/perf/builtin-probe.c @@ -391,7 +391,7 @@ static int perf_add_probe_events(struct perf_probe_event *pevs, int npevs) } /* Note that it is possible to skip all events because of blacklist */ - if (event) { + if (event && !probe_conf.quiet) { #ifndef HAVE_LIBTRACEEVENT pr_info("\nperf is not linked with libtraceevent, to use the new probe you can use tracefs:\n\n"); pr_info("\tcd /sys/kernel/tracing/\n"); @@ -467,8 +467,11 @@ static int perf_del_probe_events(struct strfilter *filter) ret = probe_file__get_events(kfd, filter, klist); if (ret == 0) { - strlist__for_each_entry(ent, klist) + strlist__for_each_entry(ent, klist) { + if (probe_conf.quiet) + continue; pr_info("Removed event: %s\n", ent->s); + } ret = probe_file__del_strlist(kfd, klist); if (ret < 0) @@ -478,8 +481,11 @@ static int perf_del_probe_events(struct strfilter *filter) ret2 = probe_file__get_events(ufd, filter, ulist); if (ret2 == 0) { - strlist__for_each_entry(ent, ulist) + strlist__for_each_entry(ent, ulist) { + if (probe_conf.quiet) + continue; pr_info("Removed event: %s\n", ent->s); + } ret2 = probe_file__del_strlist(ufd, ulist); if (ret2 < 0) @@ -531,7 +537,7 @@ __cmd_probe(int argc, const char **argv) struct option options[] = { OPT_INCR('v', "verbose", &verbose, "be more verbose (show parsed arguments, etc)"), - OPT_BOOLEAN('q', "quiet", &quiet, + OPT_BOOLEAN('q', "quiet", &probe_conf.quiet, "be quiet (do not show any warnings or messages)"), OPT_CALLBACK_DEFAULT('l', "list", NULL, "[GROUP:]EVENT", "list up probe events", @@ -631,7 +637,7 @@ __cmd_probe(int argc, const char **argv) argc = parse_options(argc, argv, options, probe_usage, PARSE_OPT_STOP_AT_NON_OPTION); - if (quiet) { + if (probe_conf.quiet) { if (verbose != 0) { pr_err(" Error: -v and -q are exclusive.\n"); return -EINVAL; diff --git a/tools/perf/util/probe-event.h b/tools/perf/util/probe-event.h index 71905ede0207..55771113791f 100644 --- a/tools/perf/util/probe-event.h +++ b/tools/perf/util/probe-event.h @@ -10,6 +10,7 @@ struct nsinfo; /* Probe related configurations */ struct probe_conf { + bool quiet; bool show_ext_vars; bool show_location_range; bool force_add; -- 2.47.1 ^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread
[parent not found: <CA+JHD92anFo9rNOZ8NVyY4j23ukyWO-LRroHfUTnuOLnL-05-g@mail.gmail.com>]
* Re: [PATCH] perf probe: Introduce --no-advice option when a new event is created [not found] ` <CA+JHD92anFo9rNOZ8NVyY4j23ukyWO-LRroHfUTnuOLnL-05-g@mail.gmail.com> @ 2025-01-25 12:31 ` Aaron Tomlin 0 siblings, 0 replies; 8+ messages in thread From: Aaron Tomlin @ 2025-01-25 12:31 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo Cc: Namhyung Kim, Peter Zijlstra, Ingo Molnar, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo, Mark Rutland, Alexander Shishkin, Jiri Olsa, Ian Rogers, Adrian Hunter, Kan Liang, linux-perf-users, Linux Kernel Mailing List On Fri, Jan 24, 2025 at 12:42:26PM +0100, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo wrote: > Consider setting it via 'perf config', see a recent patch I sent for the > wall clock profiling feature, it would be something like: > > perf config probe.quiet=true > > https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/Z4akewi7UPXpagce@x1/ > > - Arnaldo Thank you Arnaldo. -- Aaron Tomlin ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2025-03-23 18:39 UTC | newest] Thread overview: 8+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed -- links below jump to the message on this page -- 2024-12-14 19:34 [PATCH] perf probe: Introduce --no-advice option when a new event is created Aaron Tomlin 2025-01-24 0:25 ` Namhyung Kim 2025-01-24 10:54 ` Aaron Tomlin 2025-01-24 17:37 ` Namhyung Kim 2025-01-25 12:22 ` Aaron Tomlin 2025-03-23 18:39 ` [PATCH 0/1] perf probe: Extend the quiet option Aaron Tomlin 2025-03-23 18:39 ` [PATCH 1/1] " Aaron Tomlin [not found] ` <CA+JHD92anFo9rNOZ8NVyY4j23ukyWO-LRroHfUTnuOLnL-05-g@mail.gmail.com> 2025-01-25 12:31 ` [PATCH] perf probe: Introduce --no-advice option when a new event is created Aaron Tomlin
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox; as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).