public inbox for linux-perf-users@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Namhyung Kim <namhyung@kernel.org>
To: Ian Rogers <irogers@google.com>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>,
	Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@kernel.org>,
	Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>,
	Alexander Shishkin <alexander.shishkin@linux.intel.com>,
	Jiri Olsa <jolsa@kernel.org>,
	Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@intel.com>,
	Kan Liang <kan.liang@linux.intel.com>,
	James Clark <james.clark@linaro.org>,
	Weilin Wang <weilin.wang@intel.com>,
	linux-perf-users@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] perf test: Skip Intel TPEBS under hypervisor
Date: Tue, 28 Jan 2025 09:42:03 -0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <Z5kW69biAERrAFxe@google.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20250128043739.256305-1-irogers@google.com>

On Mon, Jan 27, 2025 at 08:37:39PM -0800, Ian Rogers wrote:
> Intel TPEBS test skips on non-Intel CPUs. On Intel CPUs under a
> hypervisor the cache-misses event may not be present. Skip the test
> under this condition.
> 
> Refactor the output code to be placed in a file so that on a signal
> the file can be dumped. This was necessary to catch the issue above as
> the failing perf record command would fail without output.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Ian Rogers <irogers@google.com>
> ---
> v2: Fix lost :R and use :p with record as it is ignored by perf stat.
> ---
>  .../perf/tests/shell/test_stat_intel_tpebs.sh | 36 +++++++++++--------
>  1 file changed, 22 insertions(+), 14 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/tools/perf/tests/shell/test_stat_intel_tpebs.sh b/tools/perf/tests/shell/test_stat_intel_tpebs.sh
> index 695dcb93bb5e..a330ecdb7ba5 100755
> --- a/tools/perf/tests/shell/test_stat_intel_tpebs.sh
> +++ b/tools/perf/tests/shell/test_stat_intel_tpebs.sh
> @@ -20,31 +20,39 @@ then
>    exit 2
>  fi
>  
> +stat_output=$(mktemp /tmp/__perf_stat_tpebs_output.XXXXX)
> +
>  cleanup() {
> +  rm -rf "${stat_output}"
>    trap - EXIT TERM INT
>  }
>  
>  trap_cleanup() {
>    echo "Unexpected signal in ${FUNCNAME[1]}"
> +  cat "${stat_output}"
>    cleanup
>    exit 1
>  }
>  trap trap_cleanup EXIT TERM INT
>  
> -# Use this event for testing because it should exist in all platforms
> -event=cache-misses:R
> -
> -# Hybrid platforms output like "cpu_atom/cache-misses/R", rather than as above
> -alt_name=/cache-misses/R
> +# Event to be used in tests
> +event=cache-misses
>  
> -# Without this cmd option, default value or zero is returned
> -#echo "Testing without --record-tpebs"
> -#result=$(perf stat -e "$event" true 2>&1)
> -#[[ "$result" =~ $event || "$result" =~ $alt_name ]] || exit 1
> +if ! perf record -e "${event}:p" -a -o /dev/null sleep 0.01 > "${stat_output}" 2>&1

Shouldn't it simply be

  if ! perf list hw | grep -q cache-misses

?  Doesn't it work on hybrid?

Thanks,
Namhyung


> +then
> +  echo "Missing ${event} support"
> +  cleanup
> +  exit 2
> +fi
>  
>  test_with_record_tpebs() {
>    echo "Testing with --record-tpebs"
> -  result=$(perf stat -e "$event" --record-tpebs -a sleep 0.01 2>&1)
> +  if ! perf stat -e "${event}:R" --record-tpebs -a sleep 0.01 > "${stat_output}" 2>&1
> +  then
> +    echo "Testing with --record-tpebs [Failed perf stat]"
> +    cat "${stat_output}"
> +    exit 1
> +  fi
>  
>    # Expected output:
>    # $ perf stat --record-tpebs -e cache-misses:R -a sleep 0.01
> @@ -57,16 +65,16 @@ test_with_record_tpebs() {
>    #                  0      cache-misses:R
>    #
>    #        0.013963299 seconds time elapsed
> -  if [[ ! "$result" =~ "perf record" ]]
> +  if ! grep "perf record" "${stat_output}"
>    then
>      echo "Testing with --record-tpebs [Failed missing perf record]"
> -    echo "$result"
> +    cat "${stat_output}"
>      exit 1
>    fi
> -  if [[ ! "$result" =~ $event && ! "$result" =~ $alt_name ]]
> +  if ! grep "${event}:R" "${stat_output}" && ! grep "/${event}/R" "${stat_output}"
>    then
>      echo "Testing with --record-tpebs [Failed missing event name]"
> -    echo "$result"
> +    cat "${stat_output}"
>      exit 1
>    fi
>    echo "Testing with --record-tpebs [Success]"
> -- 
> 2.48.1.262.g85cc9f2d1e-goog
> 

  reply	other threads:[~2025-01-28 17:42 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2025-01-28  4:37 [PATCH v2] perf test: Skip Intel TPEBS under hypervisor Ian Rogers
2025-01-28 17:42 ` Namhyung Kim [this message]
2025-01-28 17:59   ` Ian Rogers
2025-01-29 22:10     ` Namhyung Kim
2025-01-29 17:57 ` Falcon, Thomas
2025-01-30 16:41   ` Ian Rogers

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=Z5kW69biAERrAFxe@google.com \
    --to=namhyung@kernel.org \
    --cc=acme@kernel.org \
    --cc=adrian.hunter@intel.com \
    --cc=alexander.shishkin@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=irogers@google.com \
    --cc=james.clark@linaro.org \
    --cc=jolsa@kernel.org \
    --cc=kan.liang@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-perf-users@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mark.rutland@arm.com \
    --cc=mingo@redhat.com \
    --cc=peterz@infradead.org \
    --cc=weilin.wang@intel.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox