linux-perf-users.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@kernel.org>
To: Namhyung Kim <namhyung@kernel.org>
Cc: Howard Chu <howardchu95@gmail.com>,
	Ian Rogers <irogers@google.com>,
	Kan Liang <kan.liang@linux.intel.com>,
	Jiri Olsa <jolsa@kernel.org>,
	Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@intel.com>,
	Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>,
	LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	linux-perf-users@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 0/4] perf trace: Add --summary-mode option
Date: Wed, 12 Feb 2025 21:59:26 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <Z60Lrs0U0gIF5oaW@x1> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <Z6ztSE_yo2t28w45@google.com>

On Wed, Feb 12, 2025 at 10:49:44AM -0800, Namhyung Kim wrote:
> On Fri, Feb 07, 2025 at 09:25:02PM -0800, Howard Chu wrote:
> > Hello Namhyung,
> > 
> > On Wed, Feb 5, 2025 at 12:54 PM Namhyung Kim <namhyung@kernel.org> wrote:
> > >
> > > Hello,
> > >
> > > I've realized that perf trace shows system call summary at the end for
> > > each thread.  But sometimes users want to see the global whole system
> > > summary or statistics instead.
> > >
> > > So I've added --summary-mode option like below:
> > >
> > >     $ sudo ./perf trace -as --summary-mode=total sleep 1
> > >
> > >      Summary of events:
> > >
> > >      total, 21580 events
> > >
> > >        syscall            calls  errors  total       min       avg       max       stddev
> > >                                          (msec)    (msec)    (msec)    (msec)        (%)
> > >        --------------- --------  ------ -------- --------- --------- ---------     ------
> > >        epoll_wait          1305      0 14716.712     0.000    11.277   551.529      8.87%
> > >        futex               1256     89 13331.197     0.000    10.614   733.722     15.49%
> > >        poll                 669      0  6806.618     0.000    10.174   459.316     11.77%
> > >        ppoll                220      0  3968.797     0.000    18.040   516.775     25.35%
> > >        clock_nanosleep        1      0  1000.027  1000.027  1000.027  1000.027      0.00%
> > >        epoll_pwait           21      0   592.783     0.000    28.228   522.293     88.29%
> > >        nanosleep             16      0    60.515     0.000     3.782    10.123     33.33%
> > >        ioctl                510      0     4.284     0.001     0.008     0.182      8.84%
> > >        recvmsg             1434    775     3.497     0.001     0.002     0.174      6.37%
> > >        write               1393      0     2.854     0.001     0.002     0.017      1.79%
> > >        read                1063    100     2.236     0.000     0.002     0.083      5.11%
> > >        ...
> > >
> > > Also it changes internal data structure to hash table to track
> > > statistics of syscalls.  And removes the rb_resort code.
> > >
> > > v3 changes)
> > > * Add Acked-by from Howard
> > > * Update commit messages  (Ian)
> > 
> > Sorry for the delay.
> > 
> > Reviewed-by: Howard Chu <howardchu95@gmail.com>
> 
> Thanks for your review!
> 
> Arnaldo and Ian, are you ok with this?

I looked at it quickly, some minor nits, apart from that, for the
series:

Acked-by: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@redhat.com>
Tested-by: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@redhat.com>

- Arnaldo

  reply	other threads:[~2025-02-12 20:59 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2025-02-05 20:54 [PATCH v3 0/4] perf trace: Add --summary-mode option Namhyung Kim
2025-02-05 20:54 ` [PATCH v3 1/4] perf trace: Allocate syscall stats only if summary is on Namhyung Kim
2025-02-12 20:50   ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2025-02-13  3:39     ` Namhyung Kim
2025-02-05 20:54 ` [PATCH v3 2/4] perf trace: Convert syscall_stats to hashmap Namhyung Kim
2025-02-12 20:54   ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2025-02-05 20:54 ` [PATCH v3 3/4] perf tools: Get rid of now-unused rb_resort.h Namhyung Kim
2025-02-05 20:54 ` [PATCH v3 4/4] perf trace: Add --summary-mode option Namhyung Kim
2025-02-08  5:25 ` [PATCH v3 0/4] " Howard Chu
2025-02-12 18:49   ` Namhyung Kim
2025-02-12 20:59     ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo [this message]
2025-02-12 22:10       ` Namhyung Kim
2025-02-13 17:21 ` Namhyung Kim

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=Z60Lrs0U0gIF5oaW@x1 \
    --to=acme@kernel.org \
    --cc=adrian.hunter@intel.com \
    --cc=howardchu95@gmail.com \
    --cc=irogers@google.com \
    --cc=jolsa@kernel.org \
    --cc=kan.liang@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-perf-users@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mingo@kernel.org \
    --cc=namhyung@kernel.org \
    --cc=peterz@infradead.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).