* [PATCH] perf report: Fix a memory leak for perf_env on AMD
@ 2025-03-11 0:04 Namhyung Kim
2025-03-11 0:49 ` Ian Rogers
2025-03-25 19:49 ` Namhyung Kim
0 siblings, 2 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: Namhyung Kim @ 2025-03-11 0:04 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo, Ian Rogers, Kan Liang
Cc: Jiri Olsa, Adrian Hunter, Peter Zijlstra, Ingo Molnar, LKML,
linux-perf-users, Ravi Bangoria
The env.pmu_mapping can be leaked when it reads data from a pipe on AMD.
For a pipe data, it reads the header data including pmu_mapping from
PERF_RECORD_HEADER_FEATURE runtime. But it's already set in:
perf_session__new()
__perf_session__new()
evlist__init_trace_event_sample_raw()
evlist__has_amd_ibs()
perf_env__nr_pmu_mappings()
Then it'll overwrite that when it processes the HEADER_FEATURE record.
Here's a report from address sanitizer.
Direct leak of 2689 byte(s) in 1 object(s) allocated from:
#0 0x7fed8f814596 in realloc ../../../../src/libsanitizer/lsan/lsan_interceptors.cpp:98
#1 0x5595a7d416b1 in strbuf_grow util/strbuf.c:64
#2 0x5595a7d414ef in strbuf_init util/strbuf.c:25
#3 0x5595a7d0f4b7 in perf_env__read_pmu_mappings util/env.c:362
#4 0x5595a7d12ab7 in perf_env__nr_pmu_mappings util/env.c:517
#5 0x5595a7d89d2f in evlist__has_amd_ibs util/amd-sample-raw.c:315
#6 0x5595a7d87fb2 in evlist__init_trace_event_sample_raw util/sample-raw.c:23
#7 0x5595a7d7f893 in __perf_session__new util/session.c:179
#8 0x5595a7b79572 in perf_session__new util/session.h:115
#9 0x5595a7b7e9dc in cmd_report builtin-report.c:1603
#10 0x5595a7c019eb in run_builtin perf.c:351
#11 0x5595a7c01c92 in handle_internal_command perf.c:404
#12 0x5595a7c01deb in run_argv perf.c:448
#13 0x5595a7c02134 in main perf.c:556
#14 0x7fed85833d67 in __libc_start_call_main ../sysdeps/nptl/libc_start_call_main.h:58
Let's free the existing pmu_mapping data if any.
Cc: Ravi Bangoria <ravi.bangoria@amd.com>
Signed-off-by: Namhyung Kim <namhyung@kernel.org>
---
| 2 ++
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)
--git a/tools/perf/util/header.c b/tools/perf/util/header.c
index 1900965f87527948..e3cdc3b7b4ab2409 100644
--- a/tools/perf/util/header.c
+++ b/tools/perf/util/header.c
@@ -2770,6 +2770,8 @@ static int process_pmu_mappings(struct feat_fd *ff, void *data __maybe_unused)
free(name);
pmu_num--;
}
+ /* AMD may set it by evlist__has_amd_ibs() from perf_session__new() */
+ free(ff->ph->env.pmu_mappings);
ff->ph->env.pmu_mappings = strbuf_detach(&sb, NULL);
return 0;
--
2.49.0.rc0.332.g42c0ae87b1-goog
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] perf report: Fix a memory leak for perf_env on AMD
2025-03-11 0:04 [PATCH] perf report: Fix a memory leak for perf_env on AMD Namhyung Kim
@ 2025-03-11 0:49 ` Ian Rogers
2025-03-12 2:16 ` Namhyung Kim
2025-03-25 19:49 ` Namhyung Kim
1 sibling, 1 reply; 4+ messages in thread
From: Ian Rogers @ 2025-03-11 0:49 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Namhyung Kim
Cc: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo, Kan Liang, Jiri Olsa, Adrian Hunter,
Peter Zijlstra, Ingo Molnar, LKML, linux-perf-users,
Ravi Bangoria
On Mon, Mar 10, 2025 at 5:04 PM Namhyung Kim <namhyung@kernel.org> wrote:
>
> The env.pmu_mapping can be leaked when it reads data from a pipe on AMD.
> For a pipe data, it reads the header data including pmu_mapping from
> PERF_RECORD_HEADER_FEATURE runtime. But it's already set in:
>
> perf_session__new()
> __perf_session__new()
> evlist__init_trace_event_sample_raw()
> evlist__has_amd_ibs()
> perf_env__nr_pmu_mappings()
>
> Then it'll overwrite that when it processes the HEADER_FEATURE record.
> Here's a report from address sanitizer.
>
> Direct leak of 2689 byte(s) in 1 object(s) allocated from:
> #0 0x7fed8f814596 in realloc ../../../../src/libsanitizer/lsan/lsan_interceptors.cpp:98
> #1 0x5595a7d416b1 in strbuf_grow util/strbuf.c:64
> #2 0x5595a7d414ef in strbuf_init util/strbuf.c:25
> #3 0x5595a7d0f4b7 in perf_env__read_pmu_mappings util/env.c:362
> #4 0x5595a7d12ab7 in perf_env__nr_pmu_mappings util/env.c:517
> #5 0x5595a7d89d2f in evlist__has_amd_ibs util/amd-sample-raw.c:315
> #6 0x5595a7d87fb2 in evlist__init_trace_event_sample_raw util/sample-raw.c:23
> #7 0x5595a7d7f893 in __perf_session__new util/session.c:179
> #8 0x5595a7b79572 in perf_session__new util/session.h:115
> #9 0x5595a7b7e9dc in cmd_report builtin-report.c:1603
> #10 0x5595a7c019eb in run_builtin perf.c:351
> #11 0x5595a7c01c92 in handle_internal_command perf.c:404
> #12 0x5595a7c01deb in run_argv perf.c:448
> #13 0x5595a7c02134 in main perf.c:556
> #14 0x7fed85833d67 in __libc_start_call_main ../sysdeps/nptl/libc_start_call_main.h:58
>
> Let's free the existing pmu_mapping data if any.
Can we simplify `evlist__has_amd_ibs` as there seems no reason to be
creating/parsing strings. For example:
```
bool evlist__has_amd_ibs(struct evlist *evlist)
{
return perf_pmus__find("ibs_op") != NULL ||
perf_pmus__find("ibs_fetch") != NULL;
}
```
Similarly the variables `ibs_fetch_type` and `ibs_op_type` can be
found with `perf_pmus__find("ibs_op")->type` and
`perf_pmus__find("ibs_op")->type` respectively. It probably makes more
sense to just cache access to the PMUs rather than do the finds all
the time.
I wonder there is a problem with the pmus alternative that currently
the pmus are global and not part of say the session, not loaded from
the perf.data file, etc. So use on a different machine than the
recording could be broken by what I suggest. I guess then, just
throwing in the free is simplest.
Thanks,
Ian
> Cc: Ravi Bangoria <ravi.bangoria@amd.com>
> Signed-off-by: Namhyung Kim <namhyung@kernel.org>
> ---
> tools/perf/util/header.c | 2 ++
> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/tools/perf/util/header.c b/tools/perf/util/header.c
> index 1900965f87527948..e3cdc3b7b4ab2409 100644
> --- a/tools/perf/util/header.c
> +++ b/tools/perf/util/header.c
> @@ -2770,6 +2770,8 @@ static int process_pmu_mappings(struct feat_fd *ff, void *data __maybe_unused)
> free(name);
> pmu_num--;
> }
> + /* AMD may set it by evlist__has_amd_ibs() from perf_session__new() */
> + free(ff->ph->env.pmu_mappings);
> ff->ph->env.pmu_mappings = strbuf_detach(&sb, NULL);
> return 0;
>
> --
> 2.49.0.rc0.332.g42c0ae87b1-goog
>
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] perf report: Fix a memory leak for perf_env on AMD
2025-03-11 0:49 ` Ian Rogers
@ 2025-03-12 2:16 ` Namhyung Kim
0 siblings, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: Namhyung Kim @ 2025-03-12 2:16 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Ian Rogers
Cc: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo, Kan Liang, Jiri Olsa, Adrian Hunter,
Peter Zijlstra, Ingo Molnar, LKML, linux-perf-users,
Ravi Bangoria
On Mon, Mar 10, 2025 at 05:49:48PM -0700, Ian Rogers wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 10, 2025 at 5:04 PM Namhyung Kim <namhyung@kernel.org> wrote:
> >
> > The env.pmu_mapping can be leaked when it reads data from a pipe on AMD.
> > For a pipe data, it reads the header data including pmu_mapping from
> > PERF_RECORD_HEADER_FEATURE runtime. But it's already set in:
> >
> > perf_session__new()
> > __perf_session__new()
> > evlist__init_trace_event_sample_raw()
> > evlist__has_amd_ibs()
> > perf_env__nr_pmu_mappings()
> >
> > Then it'll overwrite that when it processes the HEADER_FEATURE record.
> > Here's a report from address sanitizer.
> >
> > Direct leak of 2689 byte(s) in 1 object(s) allocated from:
> > #0 0x7fed8f814596 in realloc ../../../../src/libsanitizer/lsan/lsan_interceptors.cpp:98
> > #1 0x5595a7d416b1 in strbuf_grow util/strbuf.c:64
> > #2 0x5595a7d414ef in strbuf_init util/strbuf.c:25
> > #3 0x5595a7d0f4b7 in perf_env__read_pmu_mappings util/env.c:362
> > #4 0x5595a7d12ab7 in perf_env__nr_pmu_mappings util/env.c:517
> > #5 0x5595a7d89d2f in evlist__has_amd_ibs util/amd-sample-raw.c:315
> > #6 0x5595a7d87fb2 in evlist__init_trace_event_sample_raw util/sample-raw.c:23
> > #7 0x5595a7d7f893 in __perf_session__new util/session.c:179
> > #8 0x5595a7b79572 in perf_session__new util/session.h:115
> > #9 0x5595a7b7e9dc in cmd_report builtin-report.c:1603
> > #10 0x5595a7c019eb in run_builtin perf.c:351
> > #11 0x5595a7c01c92 in handle_internal_command perf.c:404
> > #12 0x5595a7c01deb in run_argv perf.c:448
> > #13 0x5595a7c02134 in main perf.c:556
> > #14 0x7fed85833d67 in __libc_start_call_main ../sysdeps/nptl/libc_start_call_main.h:58
> >
> > Let's free the existing pmu_mapping data if any.
>
> Can we simplify `evlist__has_amd_ibs` as there seems no reason to be
> creating/parsing strings. For example:
> ```
> bool evlist__has_amd_ibs(struct evlist *evlist)
> {
> return perf_pmus__find("ibs_op") != NULL ||
> perf_pmus__find("ibs_fetch") != NULL;
> }
> ```
I think the idea is to find the pmu from the recorded data file not
at runtime.
> Similarly the variables `ibs_fetch_type` and `ibs_op_type` can be
> found with `perf_pmus__find("ibs_op")->type` and
> `perf_pmus__find("ibs_op")->type` respectively. It probably makes more
> sense to just cache access to the PMUs rather than do the finds all
> the time.
>
> I wonder there is a problem with the pmus alternative that currently
> the pmus are global and not part of say the session, not loaded from
> the perf.data file, etc. So use on a different machine than the
> recording could be broken by what I suggest. I guess then, just
> throwing in the free is simplest.
Agreed. It could be saved in a session or env.
For now, let's free the string to fix the leak quickly.
Thanks,
Namhyung
>
>
> > Cc: Ravi Bangoria <ravi.bangoria@amd.com>
> > Signed-off-by: Namhyung Kim <namhyung@kernel.org>
> > ---
> > tools/perf/util/header.c | 2 ++
> > 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)
> >
> > diff --git a/tools/perf/util/header.c b/tools/perf/util/header.c
> > index 1900965f87527948..e3cdc3b7b4ab2409 100644
> > --- a/tools/perf/util/header.c
> > +++ b/tools/perf/util/header.c
> > @@ -2770,6 +2770,8 @@ static int process_pmu_mappings(struct feat_fd *ff, void *data __maybe_unused)
> > free(name);
> > pmu_num--;
> > }
> > + /* AMD may set it by evlist__has_amd_ibs() from perf_session__new() */
> > + free(ff->ph->env.pmu_mappings);
> > ff->ph->env.pmu_mappings = strbuf_detach(&sb, NULL);
> > return 0;
> >
> > --
> > 2.49.0.rc0.332.g42c0ae87b1-goog
> >
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] perf report: Fix a memory leak for perf_env on AMD
2025-03-11 0:04 [PATCH] perf report: Fix a memory leak for perf_env on AMD Namhyung Kim
2025-03-11 0:49 ` Ian Rogers
@ 2025-03-25 19:49 ` Namhyung Kim
1 sibling, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: Namhyung Kim @ 2025-03-25 19:49 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo, Ian Rogers, Kan Liang, Namhyung Kim
Cc: Jiri Olsa, Adrian Hunter, Peter Zijlstra, Ingo Molnar, LKML,
linux-perf-users, Ravi Bangoria
On Mon, 10 Mar 2025 17:04:16 -0700, Namhyung Kim wrote:
> The env.pmu_mapping can be leaked when it reads data from a pipe on AMD.
> For a pipe data, it reads the header data including pmu_mapping from
> PERF_RECORD_HEADER_FEATURE runtime. But it's already set in:
>
> perf_session__new()
> __perf_session__new()
> evlist__init_trace_event_sample_raw()
> evlist__has_amd_ibs()
> perf_env__nr_pmu_mappings()
>
> [...]
Applied to perf-tools-next, thanks!
Best regards,
Namhyung
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2025-03-25 19:49 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2025-03-11 0:04 [PATCH] perf report: Fix a memory leak for perf_env on AMD Namhyung Kim
2025-03-11 0:49 ` Ian Rogers
2025-03-12 2:16 ` Namhyung Kim
2025-03-25 19:49 ` Namhyung Kim
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).