From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from smtp.kernel.org (aws-us-west-2-korg-mail-1.web.codeaurora.org [10.30.226.201]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8486A2144A6; Tue, 18 Mar 2025 18:36:01 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=10.30.226.201 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1742322961; cv=none; b=Ud7ttgJe4zIEwJo74npM0GZ9ijKpZRQ6/JpsU7yq4qH3IoBIujrser5tkxrzLS9NyOWsObV3PeudZdZ6EEuuMFJvRqNYrfrJyzpe9GDnd7l0VwWzIxXMEHXJGbIiF5ItAGU6OuCqw+aLGeJsHkS3UDw2M6ndG4jtdtsEl3N8i1Q= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1742322961; c=relaxed/simple; bh=pwoLy758tJWHhrF4rsg554mdoSJp4CwDBOkScT2rZfs=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:References:MIME-Version: Content-Type:Content-Disposition:In-Reply-To; b=coC6mJEWlkOCblyczmitxEsIwhYYnkQ1C34MXAUciwEDP5mxTNbpBb06fAnwO8h/xFepIH0m0MuLAHR23rgmKxwTetlXu5K3dOWrBFBLnzS33HiPPTbQDyaFaGMZo5Ef4UoFE+8uktIjyqHXP+bKEGkpkQV9x4RRw42GYqrtlNE= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b=GGIlcnf0; arc=none smtp.client-ip=10.30.226.201 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b="GGIlcnf0" Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 50958C4CEEE; Tue, 18 Mar 2025 18:35:54 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=k20201202; t=1742322961; bh=pwoLy758tJWHhrF4rsg554mdoSJp4CwDBOkScT2rZfs=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:References:In-Reply-To:From; b=GGIlcnf0XAs7uNt/KYI82slLCMCem5pYXQZ/akHFyMfFVheXjPEFbFWSseIpLOB1Z bFHBoXkOPL1xAWqjK6hLiron4SjTFIY4Km49fPSHxbmnZCyucg+l5URG2zWjZ8WWVn nxEvIIPd1ObqKYKbofcRWZZq6G/vbheZ4sJMy7GZEhik4D/vDGnKlr5iPVbjnaaQmp S6mGJOPfv2hY2Pg2m1Ck7tvIlMqL1+Tf6MJVHsijrmAikXLoUqoLl5Q241NWWOjIgi lo9aaTlk1YoP9tJBldVo19eY3aDzMmnKJvpqgowOnNzOYxmJHOJA0lePpoLWn0H54L 5TxtMPErN05Tw== Date: Tue, 18 Mar 2025 19:35:51 +0100 From: Ingo Molnar To: Sohil Mehta Cc: x86@kernel.org, Dave Hansen , Ingo Molnar , Peter Zijlstra , Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo , Namhyung Kim , Mark Rutland , Alexander Shishkin , Jiri Olsa , Ian Rogers , Adrian Hunter , Kan Liang , Thomas Gleixner , Borislav Petkov , "H . Peter Anvin" , "Rafael J . Wysocki" , Len Brown , Andy Lutomirski , Viresh Kumar , Jean Delvare , Guenter Roeck , Zhang Rui , Andrew Cooper , David Laight , Dapeng Mi , linux-perf-users@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org, linux-pm@vger.kernel.org, Tony Luck Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 00/15] Prepare for new Intel Family numbers Message-ID: References: <20250219184133.816753-1-sohil.mehta@intel.com> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-perf-users@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: * Sohil Mehta wrote: > On 2/19/2025 10:41 AM, Sohil Mehta wrote: > > ---Summary--- > > Mainstream Intel processors have been using Family 6 for a couple of decades. > > This series is an audit of all the arch/x86 Intel Family-model checks to get > > ready for the upcoming Family 18 and 19 models. It also converts the last > > reamaining Intel x86_model checks to VFM ones. > > > > Patch 1-8 : Include Dave Hansen's Acked-by. > > Patch 9-15: Almost ready to merge but don't have review tags yet. > > > > Is there any additional feedback? Looks mostly good to me. > Most patches have review tags now or are simple enough that they might > not need one. Patch 11 can probably use another look. LGTM, but I've extended the Cc: list to make more people aware. (I did the same for some of the other patches that could use extra eyes.) > Patch 14 is the only one that has a minor change. Seeking additional > input before spinning another revision. I've applied the first 13 patches to tip:x86/cpu to help move this along. I fixed a handful of typos, but haven't noticed any functional problems so far, so unless there's problems in -next this might be OK for the merge window. (Famous last words.) Thanks, Ingo