linux-perf-users.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@kernel.org>
To: Ian Rogers <irogers@google.com>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>,
	Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>,
	Alexander Shishkin <alexander.shishkin@linux.intel.com>,
	Jiri Olsa <jolsa@kernel.org>, Namhyung Kim <namhyung@kernel.org>,
	Kan Liang <kan.liang@linux.intel.com>,
	Zhengjun Xing <zhengjun.xing@linux.intel.com>,
	Ravi Bangoria <ravi.bangoria@amd.com>,
	Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@intel.com>,
	"Steinar H. Gunderson" <sesse@google.com>,
	Qi Liu <liuqi115@huawei.com>, Kim Phillips <kim.phillips@amd.com>,
	Florian Fischer <florian.fischer@muhq.space>,
	James Clark <james.clark@arm.com>,
	Suzuki Poulouse <suzuki.poulose@arm.com>,
	Sean Christopherson <seanjc@google.com>,
	Leo Yan <leo.yan@linaro.org>,
	John Garry <john.g.garry@oracle.com>,
	Kajol Jain <kjain@linux.ibm.com>,
	linux-perf-users@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	Stephane Eranian <eranian@google.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 03/10] perf record: Early auxtrace initialization before event parsing
Date: Thu, 2 Mar 2023 11:32:48 -0300	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <ZACzkOmDFuRQ5MiR@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20230302041211.852330-4-irogers@google.com>

Em Wed, Mar 01, 2023 at 08:12:04PM -0800, Ian Rogers escreveu:
> This allows event parsing to use the evsel__is_aux_event function,
> which is important when determining event grouping.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Ian Rogers <irogers@google.com>
> ---
>  tools/perf/arch/x86/util/auxtrace.c | 17 +++++++++++++----
>  tools/perf/builtin-record.c         |  6 ++++++
>  tools/perf/util/auxtrace.h          |  2 ++
>  3 files changed, 21 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/tools/perf/arch/x86/util/auxtrace.c b/tools/perf/arch/x86/util/auxtrace.c
> index 3da506e13f49..de1e4842ea2e 100644
> --- a/tools/perf/arch/x86/util/auxtrace.c
> +++ b/tools/perf/arch/x86/util/auxtrace.c
> @@ -15,6 +15,19 @@
>  #include "../../../util/intel-bts.h"
>  #include "../../../util/evlist.h"
>  
> +void auxtrace__early_init(void)
> +{
> +	struct perf_pmu *intel_pt_pmu;
> +	struct perf_pmu *intel_bts_pmu;
> +
> +	intel_pt_pmu = perf_pmu__find(INTEL_PT_PMU_NAME);
> +	if (intel_pt_pmu)
> +		intel_pt_pmu->auxtrace = true;
> +	intel_bts_pmu = perf_pmu__find(INTEL_BTS_PMU_NAME);
> +	if (intel_bts_pmu)
> +		intel_bts_pmu->auxtrace = true;
> +}
> +
>  static
>  struct auxtrace_record *auxtrace_record__init_intel(struct evlist *evlist,
>  						    int *err)
> @@ -26,11 +39,7 @@ struct auxtrace_record *auxtrace_record__init_intel(struct evlist *evlist,
>  	bool found_bts = false;
>  
>  	intel_pt_pmu = perf_pmu__find(INTEL_PT_PMU_NAME);
> -	if (intel_pt_pmu)
> -		intel_pt_pmu->auxtrace = true;

In this case, can't we do it as:

	if (intel_pt_pmu == NULL && intel_bts_pmu == NULL)
		auxtrace__early_init();

To avoid possibly doing the finds again?

- Arnaldo

>  	intel_bts_pmu = perf_pmu__find(INTEL_BTS_PMU_NAME);
> -	if (intel_bts_pmu)
> -		intel_bts_pmu->auxtrace = true;
>  
>  	evlist__for_each_entry(evlist, evsel) {
>  		if (intel_pt_pmu && evsel->core.attr.type == intel_pt_pmu->type)
> diff --git a/tools/perf/builtin-record.c b/tools/perf/builtin-record.c
> index 8374117e66f6..a0870c076dc0 100644
> --- a/tools/perf/builtin-record.c
> +++ b/tools/perf/builtin-record.c
> @@ -3940,6 +3940,10 @@ static int record__init_thread_masks(struct record *rec)
>  	return ret;
>  }
>  
> +__weak void auxtrace__early_init(void)
> +{
> +}
> +
>  int cmd_record(int argc, const char **argv)
>  {
>  	int err;
> @@ -3985,6 +3989,8 @@ int cmd_record(int argc, const char **argv)
>  	if (err)
>  		return err;
>  
> +	auxtrace__early_init();
> +
>  	argc = parse_options(argc, argv, record_options, record_usage,
>  			    PARSE_OPT_STOP_AT_NON_OPTION);
>  	if (quiet)
> diff --git a/tools/perf/util/auxtrace.h b/tools/perf/util/auxtrace.h
> index 29eb82dff574..49a86aa6ac94 100644
> --- a/tools/perf/util/auxtrace.h
> +++ b/tools/perf/util/auxtrace.h
> @@ -457,6 +457,8 @@ struct addr_filters {
>  
>  struct auxtrace_cache;
>  
> +void auxtrace__early_init(void);
> +
>  #ifdef HAVE_AUXTRACE_SUPPORT
>  
>  u64 compat_auxtrace_mmap__read_head(struct auxtrace_mmap *mm);
> -- 
> 2.39.2.722.g9855ee24e9-goog
> 

-- 

- Arnaldo

  reply	other threads:[~2023-03-02 14:32 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 27+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2023-03-02  4:12 [PATCH v1 00/10] Better fixes for grouping of events Ian Rogers
2023-03-02  4:12 ` [PATCH v1 01/10] libperf evlist: Avoid a use of evsel idx Ian Rogers
2023-03-02 14:33   ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2023-03-02  4:12 ` [PATCH v1 02/10] perf stat: Don't remove all grouped events when CPU maps disagree Ian Rogers
2023-03-02 14:33   ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2023-03-02  4:12 ` [PATCH v1 03/10] perf record: Early auxtrace initialization before event parsing Ian Rogers
2023-03-02 14:32   ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo [this message]
2023-03-02 16:05     ` Ian Rogers
2023-03-02  4:12 ` [PATCH v1 04/10] perf stat: Modify the group test Ian Rogers
2023-03-02 14:34   ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2023-03-02 16:10     ` Ian Rogers
2023-03-02  4:12 ` [PATCH v1 05/10] perf evsel: Limit in group test to CPUs Ian Rogers
2023-03-02 14:35   ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2023-03-02 15:24   ` Liang, Kan
2023-03-02 19:38     ` Ian Rogers
2023-03-02 20:28       ` Liang, Kan
2023-03-02  4:12 ` [PATCH v1 06/10] perf evsel: Allow const evsel for certain accesses Ian Rogers
2023-03-02 14:36   ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2023-03-02  4:12 ` [PATCH v1 07/10] perf evsel: Add function to compute pmu_name Ian Rogers
2023-03-02 14:39   ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2023-03-02 16:13     ` Ian Rogers
2023-03-02  4:12 ` [PATCH v1 08/10] perf parse-events: Pass ownership of the group name Ian Rogers
2023-03-02 14:45   ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2023-03-02  4:12 ` [PATCH v1 09/10] perf parse-events: Sort and group parsed events Ian Rogers
2023-03-02 14:51   ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2023-03-02 17:20     ` Ian Rogers
2023-03-02  4:12 ` [PATCH v1 10/10] perf evsel: Remove use_uncore_alias Ian Rogers

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=ZACzkOmDFuRQ5MiR@kernel.org \
    --to=acme@kernel.org \
    --cc=adrian.hunter@intel.com \
    --cc=alexander.shishkin@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=eranian@google.com \
    --cc=florian.fischer@muhq.space \
    --cc=irogers@google.com \
    --cc=james.clark@arm.com \
    --cc=john.g.garry@oracle.com \
    --cc=jolsa@kernel.org \
    --cc=kan.liang@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=kim.phillips@amd.com \
    --cc=kjain@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=leo.yan@linaro.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-perf-users@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=liuqi115@huawei.com \
    --cc=mark.rutland@arm.com \
    --cc=mingo@redhat.com \
    --cc=namhyung@kernel.org \
    --cc=peterz@infradead.org \
    --cc=ravi.bangoria@amd.com \
    --cc=seanjc@google.com \
    --cc=sesse@google.com \
    --cc=suzuki.poulose@arm.com \
    --cc=zhengjun.xing@linux.intel.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).