From: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@kernel.org>
To: Ian Rogers <irogers@google.com>
Cc: Florian Weimer <fweimer@redhat.com>,
linux-perf-users@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>,
Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>,
Alexander Shishkin <alexander.shishkin@linux.intel.com>,
Jiri Olsa <jolsa@kernel.org>, Namhyung Kim <namhyung@kernel.org>,
Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@intel.com>,
"Justin M. Forbes" <jforbes@fedoraproject.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] perf: Avoid implicit function declarations in lexer/parse interface
Date: Fri, 28 Apr 2023 22:37:08 -0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <ZEx0xAamEl66qk2w@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <ZEx0IQAtBatrRDCR@kernel.org>
Em Fri, Apr 28, 2023 at 10:34:25PM -0300, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo escreveu:
> Em Tue, Apr 25, 2023 at 10:40:14AM -0700, Ian Rogers escreveu:
> > On Tue, Apr 25, 2023 at 10:12 AM Florian Weimer <fweimer@redhat.com> wrote:
> > >
> > > In future compilers, -Wno-implicit-function-declaration may not bring
> > > back support for implicit function declarations, a feature that was
> > > removed from the C language in C99. Instead of relying on implicit
> > > declarations, include the flex-generated header from the
> > > bison-generated C code.
> > >
> > > he expr-flex.h header needs to be included later than the others
> >
> > nit: s/he/The/
> >
> > > because at the early point, the definition of YYSTYPE is not yet
> > > available.
> > >
> > > Signed-off-by: Florian Weimer <fweimer@redhat.com>
> >
> > Acked-by: Ian Rogers <irogers@google.com>
> >
> > Thanks for fighting the build wrt parallel dependencies!
> > Ian
>
>
> Thanks, applied. BTW b4 coulnd't find this message (nor the original):
>
> ⬢[acme@toolbox perf-tools-next]$ b4 am -ctsl --cc-trailers 87sfcn7uot.fsf@oldenburg.str.redhat.com
> Grabbing thread from lore.kernel.org/all/87sfcn7uot.fsf%40oldenburg.str.redhat.com/t.mbox.gz
> That message-id is not known.
> ⬢[acme@toolbox perf-tools-next]$ b4 am -ctsl --cc-trailers CAP-5=fXZv+KCdCN05wVUcAwDCZAgXjWunoaviGBQEiUPqNwOmg@mail.gmail.com
> Grabbing thread from lore.kernel.org/all/CAP-5%3DfXZv%2BKCdCN05wVUcAwDCZAgXjWunoaviGBQEiUPqNwOmg%40mail.gmail.com/t.mbox.gz
> Analyzing 1 messages in the thread
> No patches found.
> ⬢[acme@toolbox perf-tools-next]$
>
> I applied it in the old fashion.
Not so fast, removed it for now:
CC /tmp/build/perf-tools-next/util/parse-events-bison.o
In file included from util/pmu.y:14:
/tmp/build/perf-tools-next/util/pmu-flex.h:496:1: error: unknown type name ‘YYSTYPE’
496 |
| ^
/tmp/build/perf-tools-next/util/pmu-flex.h:498:19: error: unknown type name ‘YYSTYPE’
498 |
| ^
/tmp/build/perf-tools-next/util/pmu-flex.h:546:17: error: unknown type name ‘YYSTYPE’
546 | extern int yylex \
| ^~
util/pmu-bison.c: In function ‘perf_pmu_parse’:
/tmp/build/perf-tools-next/util/pmu-bison.c:69:25: error: implicit declaration of function ‘perf_pmu_lex’; did you mean ‘perf_pmu_free’? [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration]
69 | #define yylex perf_pmu_lex
| ^~~~~~~~~~~~
util/pmu-bison.c:1007:16: note: in expansion of macro ‘yylex’
At top level:
cc1: note: unrecognized command-line option ‘-Wno-unknown-warning-option’ may have been intended to silence earlier diagnostics
cc1: all warnings being treated as errors
make[4]: *** [/var/home/acme/git/perf-tools-next/tools/build/Makefile.build:97: /tmp/build/perf-tools-next/util/pmu-bison.o] Error 1
make[4]: *** Waiting for unfinished jobs....
util/bpf-filter-bison.c: In function ‘perf_bpf_filter_parse’:
/tmp/build/perf-tools-next/util/bpf-filter-bison.c:69:25: error: implicit declaration of function ‘perf_bpf_filter_lex’; did you mean ‘perf_bpf_filter_parse’? [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration]
69 | #define yylex perf_bpf_filter_lex
| ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
util/bpf-filter-bison.c:1283:16: note: in expansion of macro ‘yylex’
At top level:
cc1: note: unrecognized command-line option ‘-Wno-unknown-warning-option’ may have been intended to silence earlier diagnostics
cc1: all warnings being treated as errors
make[4]: *** [/var/home/acme/git/perf-tools-next/tools/build/Makefile.build:97: /tmp/build/perf-tools-next/util/bpf-filter-bison.o] Error 1
make[3]: *** [/var/home/acme/git/perf-tools-next/tools/build/Makefile.build:140: util] Error 2
make[2]: *** [Makefile.perf:676: /tmp/build/perf-tools-next/perf-in.o] Error 2
make[2]: *** Waiting for unfinished jobs....
CC /tmp/build/perf-tools-next/pmu-events/pmu-events.o
LD /tmp/build/perf-tools-next/pmu-events/pmu-events-in.o
make[1]: *** [Makefile.perf:236: sub-make] Error 2
make: *** [Makefile:113: install-bin] Error 2
make: Leaving directory '/var/home/acme/git/perf-tools-next/tools/perf'
Performance counter stats for 'make -k CORESIGHT=1 O=/tmp/build/perf-tools-next -C tools/perf install-bin':
40330976311 cycles:u
73953066660 instructions:u # 1.83 insn per cycle
9.268030835 seconds time elapsed
9.546339000 seconds user
7.391844000 seconds sys
⬢[acme@toolbox perf-tools-next]$ cat /etc/redhat-release
Fedora release 37 (Thirty Seven)
⬢[acme@toolbox perf-tools-next]$ rpm -q bison flex
bison-3.8.2-3.fc37.x86_64
flex-2.6.4-11.fc37.x86_64
⬢[acme@toolbox perf-tools-next]$ gcc --version
gcc (GCC) 12.2.1 20221121 (Red Hat 12.2.1-4)
Copyright (C) 2022 Free Software Foundation, Inc.
This is free software; see the source for copying conditions. There is NO
warranty; not even for MERCHANTABILITY or FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE.
⬢[acme@toolbox perf-tools-next]$
I tried rm -rf the O= build dir, etc.
- Arnaldo
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-04-29 1:37 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <87sfcn7uot.fsf@oldenburg.str.redhat.com>
2023-04-25 17:40 ` [PATCH v2] perf: Avoid implicit function declarations in lexer/parse interface Ian Rogers
2023-04-29 1:34 ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2023-04-29 1:37 ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo [this message]
2023-05-03 9:36 ` Florian Weimer
2023-05-03 9:40 ` Florian Weimer
2023-05-03 15:04 ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2023-05-03 15:28 ` Ian Rogers
2023-05-03 16:45 ` Florian Weimer
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=ZEx0xAamEl66qk2w@kernel.org \
--to=acme@kernel.org \
--cc=adrian.hunter@intel.com \
--cc=alexander.shishkin@linux.intel.com \
--cc=fweimer@redhat.com \
--cc=irogers@google.com \
--cc=jforbes@fedoraproject.org \
--cc=jolsa@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-perf-users@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mark.rutland@arm.com \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=namhyung@kernel.org \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).