linux-perf-users.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* [PATCH] perf symbols: Fix return incorrect build_id size in elf_read_build_id()
@ 2023-04-27  1:28 Yang Jihong
  2023-04-27  6:02 ` Adrian Hunter
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 4+ messages in thread
From: Yang Jihong @ 2023-04-27  1:28 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: peterz, mingo, acme, mark.rutland, alexander.shishkin, jolsa,
	namhyung, irogers, adrian.hunter, leo.yan, eranian,
	linux-perf-users, linux-kernel
  Cc: yangjihong1

In elf_read_build_id(), if gnu build_id is found, should return the size of
the actually copied data. If descsz is greater thanBuild_ID_SIZE,
write_buildid data access may occur.

Fixes: be96ea8ffa78 ("perf symbols: Fix issue with binaries using 16-bytes buildids (v2)")
Reported-by: Will Ochowicz <Will.Ochowicz@genusplc.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/CWLP265MB49702F7BA3D6D8F13E4B1A719C649@CWLP265MB4970.GBRP265.PROD.OUTLOOK.COM/T/
Tested-by: Will Ochowicz <Will.Ochowicz@genusplc.com>
Signed-off-by: Yang Jihong <yangjihong1@huawei.com>
---
 tools/perf/util/symbol-elf.c | 2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/tools/perf/util/symbol-elf.c b/tools/perf/util/symbol-elf.c
index 41882ae8452e..059f88eca630 100644
--- a/tools/perf/util/symbol-elf.c
+++ b/tools/perf/util/symbol-elf.c
@@ -903,7 +903,7 @@ static int elf_read_build_id(Elf *elf, void *bf, size_t size)
 				size_t sz = min(size, descsz);
 				memcpy(bf, ptr, sz);
 				memset(bf + sz, 0, size - sz);
-				err = descsz;
+				err = sz;
 				break;
 			}
 		}
-- 
2.30.GIT


^ permalink raw reply related	[flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH] perf symbols: Fix return incorrect build_id size in elf_read_build_id()
  2023-04-27  1:28 [PATCH] perf symbols: Fix return incorrect build_id size in elf_read_build_id() Yang Jihong
@ 2023-04-27  6:02 ` Adrian Hunter
  2023-04-27  7:27   ` Yang Jihong
  2023-04-29  1:31   ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
  0 siblings, 2 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: Adrian Hunter @ 2023-04-27  6:02 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Yang Jihong, peterz, mingo, acme, mark.rutland,
	alexander.shishkin, jolsa, namhyung, irogers, leo.yan, eranian,
	linux-perf-users, linux-kernel

On 27/04/23 04:28, Yang Jihong wrote:
> In elf_read_build_id(), if gnu build_id is found, should return the size of
> the actually copied data. If descsz is greater thanBuild_ID_SIZE,
> write_buildid data access may occur.
> 
> Fixes: be96ea8ffa78 ("perf symbols: Fix issue with binaries using 16-bytes buildids (v2)")
> Reported-by: Will Ochowicz <Will.Ochowicz@genusplc.com>
> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/CWLP265MB49702F7BA3D6D8F13E4B1A719C649@CWLP265MB4970.GBRP265.PROD.OUTLOOK.COM/T/
> Tested-by: Will Ochowicz <Will.Ochowicz@genusplc.com>
> Signed-off-by: Yang Jihong <yangjihong1@huawei.com>

As an aside, note that the build ID on the ELF file triggering the bug was
62363266373430613439613534633666326432323334653665623530396566343938656130663039
which is 80 ASCII characters, which would have been a 20 byte binary number i.e.

$ echo -en "0000: 62363266373430613439613534633666\n0010: 32643232333465366562353039656634\n0020: 3938656130663039" | xxd -r | od -c -A d 
0000000   b   6   2   f   7   4   0   a   4   9   a   5   4   c   6   f
0000016   2   d   2   2   3   4   e   6   e   b   5   0   9   e   f   4
0000032   9   8   e   a   0   f   0   9
0000040

So perhaps a mistake in the creation of the build ID on that ELF file.

In any case, for the fix:

Acked-by: Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@intel.com>

> ---
>  tools/perf/util/symbol-elf.c | 2 +-
>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 
> diff --git a/tools/perf/util/symbol-elf.c b/tools/perf/util/symbol-elf.c
> index 41882ae8452e..059f88eca630 100644
> --- a/tools/perf/util/symbol-elf.c
> +++ b/tools/perf/util/symbol-elf.c
> @@ -903,7 +903,7 @@ static int elf_read_build_id(Elf *elf, void *bf, size_t size)
>  				size_t sz = min(size, descsz);
>  				memcpy(bf, ptr, sz);
>  				memset(bf + sz, 0, size - sz);
> -				err = descsz;
> +				err = sz;
>  				break;
>  			}
>  		}


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH] perf symbols: Fix return incorrect build_id size in elf_read_build_id()
  2023-04-27  6:02 ` Adrian Hunter
@ 2023-04-27  7:27   ` Yang Jihong
  2023-04-29  1:31   ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
  1 sibling, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: Yang Jihong @ 2023-04-27  7:27 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Adrian Hunter, peterz, mingo, acme, mark.rutland,
	alexander.shishkin, jolsa, namhyung, irogers, leo.yan, eranian,
	linux-perf-users, linux-kernel

Hello,

On 2023/4/27 14:02, Adrian Hunter wrote:
> On 27/04/23 04:28, Yang Jihong wrote:
>> In elf_read_build_id(), if gnu build_id is found, should return the size of
>> the actually copied data. If descsz is greater thanBuild_ID_SIZE,
>> write_buildid data access may occur.
>>
>> Fixes: be96ea8ffa78 ("perf symbols: Fix issue with binaries using 16-bytes buildids (v2)")
>> Reported-by: Will Ochowicz <Will.Ochowicz@genusplc.com>
>> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/CWLP265MB49702F7BA3D6D8F13E4B1A719C649@CWLP265MB4970.GBRP265.PROD.OUTLOOK.COM/T/
>> Tested-by: Will Ochowicz <Will.Ochowicz@genusplc.com>
>> Signed-off-by: Yang Jihong <yangjihong1@huawei.com>
> 
> As an aside, note that the build ID on the ELF file triggering the bug was
> 62363266373430613439613534633666326432323334653665623530396566343938656130663039
> which is 80 ASCII characters, which would have been a 20 byte binary number i.e.
> 
> $ echo -en "0000: 62363266373430613439613534633666\n0010: 32643232333465366562353039656634\n0020: 3938656130663039" | xxd -r | od -c -A d
> 0000000   b   6   2   f   7   4   0   a   4   9   a   5   4   c   6   f
> 0000016   2   d   2   2   3   4   e   6   e   b   5   0   9   e   f   4
> 0000032   9   8   e   a   0   f   0   9
> 0000040
> 
> So perhaps a mistake in the creation of the build ID on that ELF file.
> 
Yes, it may be an error, or it may be that the build-id was specified 
when the elf file was created.

I tried ld can specify a build-id larger than 160-bit hexadecimal digits:

   $ ld -o test test.o 
--build-id=0x62363266373430613439613534633666326432323334653665623530396566343938656130663039
   $ readelf -n test

   Displaying notes found in: .note.gnu.build-id
     Owner                 Data size       Description
     GNU                  0x00000028       NT_GNU_BUILD_ID (unique build 
ID bitstring)
       Build ID: 
62363266373430613439613534633666326432323334653665623530396566343938656130663039

All in all, it feels like a rare scene :)

> In any case, for the fix:
> 
> Acked-by: Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@intel.com>
> 
Thanks for the acked-by.

Thanks,
Yang


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH] perf symbols: Fix return incorrect build_id size in elf_read_build_id()
  2023-04-27  6:02 ` Adrian Hunter
  2023-04-27  7:27   ` Yang Jihong
@ 2023-04-29  1:31   ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
  1 sibling, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo @ 2023-04-29  1:31 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Adrian Hunter
  Cc: Yang Jihong, peterz, mingo, mark.rutland, alexander.shishkin,
	jolsa, namhyung, irogers, leo.yan, eranian, linux-perf-users,
	linux-kernel

Em Thu, Apr 27, 2023 at 09:02:06AM +0300, Adrian Hunter escreveu:
> On 27/04/23 04:28, Yang Jihong wrote:
> > In elf_read_build_id(), if gnu build_id is found, should return the size of
> > the actually copied data. If descsz is greater thanBuild_ID_SIZE,
> > write_buildid data access may occur.
> > 
> > Fixes: be96ea8ffa78 ("perf symbols: Fix issue with binaries using 16-bytes buildids (v2)")
> > Reported-by: Will Ochowicz <Will.Ochowicz@genusplc.com>
> > Link: https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/CWLP265MB49702F7BA3D6D8F13E4B1A719C649@CWLP265MB4970.GBRP265.PROD.OUTLOOK.COM/T/
> > Tested-by: Will Ochowicz <Will.Ochowicz@genusplc.com>
> > Signed-off-by: Yang Jihong <yangjihong1@huawei.com>
> 
> As an aside, note that the build ID on the ELF file triggering the bug was
> 62363266373430613439613534633666326432323334653665623530396566343938656130663039
> which is 80 ASCII characters, which would have been a 20 byte binary number i.e.
> 
> $ echo -en "0000: 62363266373430613439613534633666\n0010: 32643232333465366562353039656634\n0020: 3938656130663039" | xxd -r | od -c -A d 
> 0000000   b   6   2   f   7   4   0   a   4   9   a   5   4   c   6   f
> 0000016   2   d   2   2   3   4   e   6   e   b   5   0   9   e   f   4
> 0000032   9   8   e   a   0   f   0   9
> 0000040
> 
> So perhaps a mistake in the creation of the build ID on that ELF file.
> 
> In any case, for the fix:
> 
> Acked-by: Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@intel.com>

Thanks, applied.

- Arnaldo

 
> > ---
> >  tools/perf/util/symbol-elf.c | 2 +-
> >  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> > 
> > diff --git a/tools/perf/util/symbol-elf.c b/tools/perf/util/symbol-elf.c
> > index 41882ae8452e..059f88eca630 100644
> > --- a/tools/perf/util/symbol-elf.c
> > +++ b/tools/perf/util/symbol-elf.c
> > @@ -903,7 +903,7 @@ static int elf_read_build_id(Elf *elf, void *bf, size_t size)
> >  				size_t sz = min(size, descsz);
> >  				memcpy(bf, ptr, sz);
> >  				memset(bf + sz, 0, size - sz);
> > -				err = descsz;
> > +				err = sz;
> >  				break;
> >  			}
> >  		}
> 

-- 

- Arnaldo

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread

end of thread, other threads:[~2023-04-29  1:31 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 4+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2023-04-27  1:28 [PATCH] perf symbols: Fix return incorrect build_id size in elf_read_build_id() Yang Jihong
2023-04-27  6:02 ` Adrian Hunter
2023-04-27  7:27   ` Yang Jihong
2023-04-29  1:31   ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).