linux-perf-users.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@kernel.org>
To: "Liang, Kan" <kan.liang@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Ian Rogers <irogers@google.com>,
	Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>,
	Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>,
	Alexander Shishkin <alexander.shishkin@linux.intel.com>,
	Jiri Olsa <jolsa@kernel.org>, Namhyung Kim <namhyung@kernel.org>,
	Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@intel.com>,
	Eduard Zingerman <eddyz87@gmail.com>,
	John Garry <john.g.garry@oracle.com>,
	Jing Zhang <renyu.zj@linux.alibaba.com>,
	James Clark <james.clark@arm.com>,
	linux-perf-users@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	Perry Taylor <perry.taylor@intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1] perf metric: Add #num_cpus_online literal
Date: Wed, 30 Aug 2023 13:28:14 -0300	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <ZO9uHhTeckwOE8dg@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <a0b88cfe-3afe-688d-861c-a9a332f66676@linux.intel.com>

Em Wed, Aug 30, 2023 at 09:14:00AM -0400, Liang, Kan escreveu:
> 
> 
> On 2023-08-30 3:30 a.m., Ian Rogers wrote:
> > Returns the number of CPUs online, unlike #num_cpus that returns the
> > number present. Add a test of the property. This will be used in
> > future Intel metrics.
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Ian Rogers <irogers@google.com>
> 
> Reviewed-by: Kan Liang <kan.liang@linux.intel.com>

Thanks, applied.

- Arnaldo

 
> Thanks,
> Kan
> > ---
> >  tools/perf/tests/expr.c | 5 ++++-
> >  tools/perf/util/expr.c  | 7 +++++++
> >  2 files changed, 11 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> > 
> > diff --git a/tools/perf/tests/expr.c b/tools/perf/tests/expr.c
> > index c1c3fcbc2753..81229fa4f1e9 100644
> > --- a/tools/perf/tests/expr.c
> > +++ b/tools/perf/tests/expr.c
> > @@ -70,7 +70,7 @@ static int test__expr(struct test_suite *t __maybe_unused, int subtest __maybe_u
> >  {
> >  	struct expr_id_data *val_ptr;
> >  	const char *p;
> > -	double val, num_cpus, num_cores, num_dies, num_packages;
> > +	double val, num_cpus_online, num_cpus, num_cores, num_dies, num_packages;
> >  	int ret;
> >  	struct expr_parse_ctx *ctx;
> >  	bool is_intel = false;
> > @@ -227,7 +227,10 @@ static int test__expr(struct test_suite *t __maybe_unused, int subtest __maybe_u
> >  
> >  	/* Test toplogy constants appear well ordered. */
> >  	expr__ctx_clear(ctx);
> > +	TEST_ASSERT_VAL("#num_cpus_online",
> > +			expr__parse(&num_cpus_online, ctx, "#num_cpus_online") == 0);
> >  	TEST_ASSERT_VAL("#num_cpus", expr__parse(&num_cpus, ctx, "#num_cpus") == 0);
> > +	TEST_ASSERT_VAL("#num_cpus >= #num_cpus_online", num_cpus >= num_cpus_online);
> >  	TEST_ASSERT_VAL("#num_cores", expr__parse(&num_cores, ctx, "#num_cores") == 0);
> >  	TEST_ASSERT_VAL("#num_cpus >= #num_cores", num_cpus >= num_cores);
> >  	TEST_ASSERT_VAL("#num_dies", expr__parse(&num_dies, ctx, "#num_dies") == 0);
> > diff --git a/tools/perf/util/expr.c b/tools/perf/util/expr.c
> > index 0985a3cbc6f9..4488f306de78 100644
> > --- a/tools/perf/util/expr.c
> > +++ b/tools/perf/util/expr.c
> > @@ -427,6 +427,13 @@ double expr__get_literal(const char *literal, const struct expr_scanner_ctx *ctx
> >  		result = cpu__max_present_cpu().cpu;
> >  		goto out;
> >  	}
> > +	if (!strcmp("#num_cpus_online", literal)) {
> > +		struct perf_cpu_map *online = cpu_map__online();
> > +
> > +		if (online)
> > +			result = perf_cpu_map__nr(online);
> > +		goto out;
> > +	}
> >  
> >  	if (!strcasecmp("#system_tsc_freq", literal)) {
> >  		result = arch_get_tsc_freq();

-- 

- Arnaldo

      reply	other threads:[~2023-08-30 18:34 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2023-08-30  7:30 [PATCH v1] perf metric: Add #num_cpus_online literal Ian Rogers
2023-08-30 13:14 ` Liang, Kan
2023-08-30 16:28   ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=ZO9uHhTeckwOE8dg@kernel.org \
    --to=acme@kernel.org \
    --cc=adrian.hunter@intel.com \
    --cc=alexander.shishkin@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=eddyz87@gmail.com \
    --cc=irogers@google.com \
    --cc=james.clark@arm.com \
    --cc=john.g.garry@oracle.com \
    --cc=jolsa@kernel.org \
    --cc=kan.liang@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-perf-users@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mark.rutland@arm.com \
    --cc=mingo@redhat.com \
    --cc=namhyung@kernel.org \
    --cc=perry.taylor@intel.com \
    --cc=peterz@infradead.org \
    --cc=renyu.zj@linux.alibaba.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).