From: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@kernel.org>
To: Ian Rogers <irogers@google.com>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>,
Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>,
Alexander Shishkin <alexander.shishkin@linux.intel.com>,
Jiri Olsa <jolsa@kernel.org>, Namhyung Kim <namhyung@kernel.org>,
Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@intel.com>,
Kan Liang <kan.liang@linux.intel.com>,
linux-perf-users@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Edward Baker <edward.baker@intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 1/4] perf vendor events intel: Alderlake/rocketlake metric fixes
Date: Thu, 4 Jan 2024 17:37:05 -0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <ZZcW8Zk02wPbpXJI@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAP-5=fV+U4qSwU8nqHJMgAZTwtWs9jEm3i9yDQSVtq9Fbos5HA@mail.gmail.com>
Em Thu, Jan 04, 2024 at 05:56:22AM -0800, Ian Rogers escreveu:
> On Thu, Jan 4, 2024 at 4:39 AM Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@kernel.org> wrote:
> > Em Wed, Jan 03, 2024 at 11:42:56PM -0800, Ian Rogers escreveu:
> > > Fix that the core PMU is being specified for 2 uncore events. Specify
> > > a PMU for the alderlake UNCORE_FREQ metric.
<SNIP>
> > 101: perf all metricgroups test : Ok
> > 102: perf all metrics test : FAILED!
> > 107: perf metrics value validation : Ok
> > 102 is now failing due to some other problem:
> > root@number:~# perf test -v 102
> > 102: perf all metrics test :
> > --- start ---
> > test child forked, pid 2701034
> > Testing tma_core_bound
> > Testing tma_info_core_ilp
<SNIP>
> > Testing tma_memory_fence
> > Metric 'tma_memory_fence' not printed in:
> > # Running 'internals/synthesize' benchmark:
> > Computing performance of single threaded perf event synthesis by
> > synthesizing events on the perf process itself:
> > Average synthesis took: 49.458 usec (+- 0.033 usec)
> > Average num. events: 47.000 (+- 0.000)
> > Average time per event 1.052 usec
> > Average data synthesis took: 53.268 usec (+- 0.027 usec)
> > Average num. events: 244.000 (+- 0.000)
> > Average time per event 0.218 usec
> > Performance counter stats for 'perf bench internals synthesize':
> > <not counted> cpu_core/TOPDOWN.SLOTS/ (0.00%)
> > <not counted> cpu_core/topdown-retiring/ (0.00%)
> > <not counted> cpu_core/topdown-mem-bound/ (0.00%)
> > <not counted> cpu_core/topdown-bad-spec/ (0.00%)
> > <not counted> cpu_core/topdown-fe-bound/ (0.00%)
> > <not counted> cpu_core/topdown-be-bound/ (0.00%)
> > <not counted> cpu_core/RESOURCE_STALLS.SCOREBOARD/ (0.00%)
> > <not counted> cpu_core/EXE_ACTIVITY.1_PORTS_UTIL/ (0.00%)
> > <not counted> cpu_core/EXE_ACTIVITY.BOUND_ON_LOADS/ (0.00%)
> > <not counted> cpu_core/MISC2_RETIRED.LFENCE/ (0.00%)
> > <not counted> cpu_core/CYCLE_ACTIVITY.STALLS_TOTAL/ (0.00%)
> > <not counted> cpu_core/CPU_CLK_UNHALTED.THREAD/ (0.00%)
> > <not counted> cpu_core/ARITH.DIV_ACTIVE/ (0.00%)
> > <not counted> cpu_core/EXE_ACTIVITY.2_PORTS_UTIL,umask=0xc/ (0.00%)
> > <not counted> cpu_core/EXE_ACTIVITY.3_PORTS_UTIL,umask=0x80/ (0.00%)
> > 1.177929044 seconds time elapsed
> > 0.434552000 seconds user
> > 0.736874000 seconds sys
> > Testing tma_port_1
<SNIP>
> > test child finished with -1
> > ---- end ----
> > perf all metrics test: FAILED!
> > root@number:~#
> Have a try disabling the NMI watchdog. Agreed that there is more to
Did the trick, added this to the cset log message:
--------------------------------------- 8< ----------------------------
Test 102 is failing for another reason, not being able to get as many
counters as needed, Ian Rogers suggested disabling the NMI watchdog to
have more counters available:
root@number:/home/acme# cat /proc/sys/kernel/nmi_watchdog
1
root@number:/home/acme# echo 0 > /proc/sys/kernel/nmi_watchdog
root@number:/home/acme# perf test 102
102: perf all metrics test : Ok
root@number:/home/acme#
--------------------------------------- 8< ----------------------------
- Arnaldo
> fix here but I think the PMU driver is in part to blame because
> manually breaking the weak group of events is a fix. Fwiw, if we
> switch to the buddy watchdog mechanism then we'll no longer need to
> disable the NMI watchdog:
> https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20230421155255.1.I6bf789d21d0c3d75d382e7e51a804a7a51315f2c@changeid/
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-01-04 20:37 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-01-04 7:42 [PATCH v1 1/4] perf vendor events intel: Alderlake/rocketlake metric fixes Ian Rogers
2024-01-04 7:42 ` [PATCH v1 2/4] perf vendor events intel: Update emeraldrapids events to v1.02 Ian Rogers
2024-01-04 7:42 ` [PATCH v1 3/4] perf vendor events intel: Update icelakex events to v1.23 Ian Rogers
2024-01-04 7:42 ` [PATCH v1 4/4] perf vendor events intel: Update sapphirerapids events to v1.17 Ian Rogers
2024-01-04 12:39 ` [PATCH v1 1/4] perf vendor events intel: Alderlake/rocketlake metric fixes Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2024-01-04 13:56 ` Ian Rogers
2024-01-04 14:30 ` Liang, Kan
2024-01-04 17:51 ` Ian Rogers
2024-01-04 19:30 ` Liang, Kan
2024-01-04 23:31 ` Ian Rogers
2024-01-04 20:37 ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo [this message]
2024-01-04 14:23 ` Liang, Kan
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=ZZcW8Zk02wPbpXJI@kernel.org \
--to=acme@kernel.org \
--cc=adrian.hunter@intel.com \
--cc=alexander.shishkin@linux.intel.com \
--cc=edward.baker@intel.com \
--cc=irogers@google.com \
--cc=jolsa@kernel.org \
--cc=kan.liang@linux.intel.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-perf-users@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mark.rutland@arm.com \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=namhyung@kernel.org \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).