Re: [RFC PATCH v1 01/15] x86/msr: Replace __wrmsr() with native_wrmsrl()

[Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>]

* H. Peter Anvin <hpa@zytor.com> wrote:

> On April 2, 2025 8:41:07 AM PDT, Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@intel.com> wrote:
> >On 3/31/25 22:53, Xin Li wrote:
> >> Per "struct msr" defined in arch/x86/include/asm/shared/msr.h:
> >> 
> >> struct msr {
> >>         union {
> >>                 struct {
> >>                         u32 l;
> >>                         u32 h;
> >>                 };
> >>                 u64 q;
> >>         };
> >> };
> >> 
> >> Probably *msrq() is what we want?
> >
> > What would folks think about "wrmsr64()"? It's writing a 64-bit 
> > value to an MSR and there are a lot of functions in the kernel that 
> > are named with the argument width in bits.
> 
> Personally, I hate the extra verbosity, mostly visual, since numerals 
> are nearly as prominent as capital letters they tend to attract the 
> eye. There is a reason why they aren't used this way in assembly 
> languages.

So what's the consensus here? Both work for me, but I have to pick one. :-)

Thanks,

	Ingo