linux-perf-users.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
To: Ian Rogers <irogers@google.com>
Cc: Mark Barnett <mark.barnett@arm.com>,
	peterz@infradead.org, mingo@redhat.com, acme@kernel.org,
	namhyung@kernel.org, ben.gainey@arm.com, deepak.surti@arm.com,
	ak@linux.intel.com, will@kernel.org, james.clark@arm.com,
	mark.rutland@arm.com, alexander.shishkin@linux.intel.com,
	jolsa@kernel.org, adrian.hunter@intel.com,
	linux-perf-users@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 0/5] A mechanism for efficient support for per-function metrics
Date: Sat, 12 Apr 2025 22:42:27 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <Z_rQMwKQDu6K66_r@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAP-5=fUukVQMRHUQ9Mpx38H-7VNLt4mDj-jaYgn8Tf4zjecD-A@mail.gmail.com>


* Ian Rogers <irogers@google.com> wrote:

> I don't think work should be gated on cleaning up perf report, top, 
> etc. which still needs clean up for things like hybrid events. As the 
> histograms should use the sample's period then I believe things 
> should just work in much the same way as leader sampling can work. 
> It'd be worth checking.

Yeah, so I think burst-profiling is basically still a single-event 
profiling mode - with a tooling-side filter that skips the long-periods 
and includes the burst-periods, and transforms all the statistics and 
counts to make sense in the usual perf context.

Ie. I don't think it should be overly intrusive, and it could be a nice 
performance & profiling quality feature we'd consider using by default 
eventually.

Thanks,

	Ingo

  reply	other threads:[~2025-04-12 20:42 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2025-04-08 17:15 [PATCH v4 0/5] A mechanism for efficient support for per-function metrics mark.barnett
2025-04-08 17:15 ` [PATCH v4 1/5] perf: Record sample last_period before updating mark.barnett
2025-04-09 11:39   ` Ingo Molnar
2025-04-08 17:15 ` [PATCH v4 2/5] perf: Allow periodic events to alternate between two sample periods mark.barnett
2025-04-08 17:15 ` [PATCH v4 3/5] perf: Allow adding fixed random jitter to the sampling period mark.barnett
2025-04-09 10:54   ` Ingo Molnar
2025-04-09 14:24   ` Peter Zijlstra
2025-04-08 17:15 ` [PATCH v4 4/5] tools/perf: Modify event parser to support hf-period term mark.barnett
2025-04-08 17:15 ` [PATCH v4 5/5] tools/perf: Modify event parser to support hf-rand term mark.barnett
2025-04-09 11:38 ` [PATCH v4 0/5] A mechanism for efficient support for per-function metrics Ingo Molnar
2025-04-11 11:07   ` Mark Barnett
2025-04-11 17:34     ` Ian Rogers
2025-04-12 20:42       ` Ingo Molnar [this message]
2025-04-12 20:38     ` Ingo Molnar
2025-04-09 14:29 ` Peter Zijlstra
2025-04-11  9:44   ` Mark Barnett

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=Z_rQMwKQDu6K66_r@gmail.com \
    --to=mingo@kernel.org \
    --cc=acme@kernel.org \
    --cc=adrian.hunter@intel.com \
    --cc=ak@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=alexander.shishkin@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=ben.gainey@arm.com \
    --cc=deepak.surti@arm.com \
    --cc=irogers@google.com \
    --cc=james.clark@arm.com \
    --cc=jolsa@kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-perf-users@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mark.barnett@arm.com \
    --cc=mark.rutland@arm.com \
    --cc=mingo@redhat.com \
    --cc=namhyung@kernel.org \
    --cc=peterz@infradead.org \
    --cc=will@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).