From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mail-oo1-f42.google.com (mail-oo1-f42.google.com [209.85.161.42]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 97E0D1845; Sun, 14 Jan 2024 06:49:08 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=gmail.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=gmail.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com header.i=@gmail.com header.b="LiyISdCs" Received: by mail-oo1-f42.google.com with SMTP id 006d021491bc7-5986f790b64so3432280eaf.3; Sat, 13 Jan 2024 22:49:08 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20230601; t=1705214947; x=1705819747; darn=vger.kernel.org; h=in-reply-to:content-disposition:mime-version:references:message-id :subject:cc:to:from:date:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=KXgb9X1CWd/PEEQiac+jZy6kkV3an6+pNU+vSf7jMVI=; b=LiyISdCs3fD+7m62L5S5+fbs0UPIU25tvZgvcIRFlMQot8KJAeeiCI4vFGwREbT/Ch odMftOR4WszV41tu6ULVVg8ZhxvDaBM70j8u+SmafTSfqUoJJ4eza4cTcII1IbdlkVex ns+w9wxNij+MMg/82A+zEFS09L6o4hIiFKmb4PRI374DuLlWz55OseUJMYJT9XhcBxvZ UM5sCfUMSHcX2m3bBhjbdjAvGmqMjozqo8Y4ZwFzQuBd5Tf+ZJsLTwq9U35IKTKNfaQC P2zbEgOA5KEifZz3nmPWFbUH/t06WdXRIsZ7CUvj/ODzsESMaBRsWfRR/77YQ9VkkkG1 QnLQ== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20230601; t=1705214947; x=1705819747; h=in-reply-to:content-disposition:mime-version:references:message-id :subject:cc:to:from:date:x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date :message-id:reply-to; bh=KXgb9X1CWd/PEEQiac+jZy6kkV3an6+pNU+vSf7jMVI=; b=gzqbGqYnG1QkISJD0H0EQf4qPGfO9zYcaVhABCYs87AXj5uVY+9YZS2ZD32mb/EeF9 yS5lFoUiNoZq/ulvLotdfd4Kjb+NhtkjjWT/Bdj1+VGmYWRMgcicjlrqsU3bv1Jbe+x6 K+1z1q07PoIx+QLBaMJGIcitWjG+/h79+j+eRWr+kJua+GhIfv7Rmc1HW5qkv1PergTu hFkf5roGsFuLFor4k4BG4Q36d2dNoTpi3gtlEO7w3JchVfvrdwuH+ZPB91tUgAzaSxGM TYaZJilzbCQZIUcNatfZw/LXdzDjttAEfhfj07s49JwnsjdoN9FcZKFN6J3R+MWP2U/C m8HA== X-Gm-Message-State: AOJu0YxKoAgfmWNnRCJgyFTrKG4dx6Z0FrYMWxvQp/W0p6mg/wrOr3gC SdhMJu2DPzs/a2g2XEJ8lZs= X-Google-Smtp-Source: AGHT+IF+BhC+uyf16yTJ+jUA9mpcMjuWd8QqAGGlDxYx1+oguvtkEI4G6Be+ISFZ+jyWpVAJfh2wPQ== X-Received: by 2002:a05:6358:9fb0:b0:175:a9ce:e69c with SMTP id fy48-20020a0563589fb000b00175a9cee69cmr16814rwb.44.1705214947397; Sat, 13 Jan 2024 22:49:07 -0800 (PST) Received: from google.com ([2620:15c:9d:2:d314:4131:10f8:370e]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id sn15-20020a17090b2e8f00b0028bd303dc58sm7292213pjb.11.2024.01.13.22.49.04 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Sat, 13 Jan 2024 22:49:06 -0800 (PST) Date: Sat, 13 Jan 2024 22:49:01 -0800 From: Dmitry Torokhov To: Peter Zijlstra Cc: torvalds@linux-foundation.org, keescook@chromium.org, gregkh@linuxfoundation.org, pbonzini@redhat.com, masahiroy@kernel.org, nathan@kernel.org, ndesaulniers@google.com, nicolas@fjasle.eu, catalin.marinas@arm.com, will@kernel.org, vkoul@kernel.org, trix@redhat.com, ojeda@kernel.org, mingo@redhat.com, longman@redhat.com, boqun.feng@gmail.com, dennis@kernel.org, tj@kernel.org, cl@linux.com, acme@kernel.org, mark.rutland@arm.com, alexander.shishkin@linux.intel.com, jolsa@kernel.org, namhyung@kernel.org, irogers@google.com, adrian.hunter@intel.com, juri.lelli@redhat.com, vincent.guittot@linaro.org, dietmar.eggemann@arm.com, rostedt@goodmis.org, bsegall@google.com, mgorman@suse.de, bristot@redhat.com, vschneid@redhat.com, paulmck@kernel.org, frederic@kernel.org, quic_neeraju@quicinc.com, joel@joelfernandes.org, josh@joshtriplett.org, mathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com, jiangshanlai@gmail.com, rientjes@google.com, vbabka@suse.cz, roman.gushchin@linux.dev, 42.hyeyoo@gmail.com, apw@canonical.com, joe@perches.com, dwaipayanray1@gmail.com, lukas.bulwahn@gmail.com, john.johansen@canonical.com, paul@paul-moore.com, jmorris@namei.org, serge@hallyn.com, linux-kbuild@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, dmaengine@vger.kernel.org, llvm@lists.linux.dev, linux-perf-users@vger.kernel.org, rcu@vger.kernel.org, linux-security-module@vger.kernel.org, tglx@linutronix.de, ravi.bangoria@amd.com, error27@gmail.com, luc.vanoostenryck@gmail.com Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 03/57] locking: Introduce __cleanup() based infrastructure Message-ID: References: <20230612090713.652690195@infradead.org> <20230612093537.614161713@infradead.org> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-perf-users@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20230612093537.614161713@infradead.org> Hi Peter, On Mon, Jun 12, 2023 at 11:07:16AM +0200, Peter Zijlstra wrote: > > +DEFINE_GUARD(mutex, struct mutex *, mutex_lock(_T), mutex_unlock(_T)) > +DEFINE_FREE(mutex, struct mutex *, if (_T) mutex_unlock(_T)) I got excited with the ability to have mutexes released automatically, however the code I work with typically uses mutex_lock_interruptible() and friends, where resource acquisition may fail. Additionally, the return values are integers and not pointers, which makes them unsuitable for something like struct mutex *guard __free(mutex) = mutex_lock_interruptible(...); I guess we could make wrappers around mutex_lock...() family to return either the mutex or ERR_PTR-encoded error, but that feels quite ugly. Do you have any suggestions here? Thanks. -- Dmitry