From: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@kernel.org>
To: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@linutronix.de>
Cc: Marco Elver <elver@google.com>,
Vince Weaver <vincent.weaver@maine.edu>,
linux-perf-users@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@intel.com>,
Alexander Shishkin <alexander.shishkin@linux.intel.com>,
Ian Rogers <irogers@google.com>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>,
Jiri Olsa <jolsa@kernel.org>, Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>,
Namhyung Kim <namhyung@kernel.org>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 0/4] perf: Make SIGTRAP and __perf_pending_irq() work on RT.
Date: Wed, 13 Mar 2024 17:14:25 -0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <ZfIJIfqeI9tWnnS5@x1> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <ZfIIqcmRlrxwUFTn@x1>
On Wed, Mar 13, 2024 at 05:12:25PM -0300, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 13, 2024 at 03:30:52PM -0300, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo wrote:
> > On Wed, Mar 13, 2024 at 03:14:28PM -0300, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo wrote:
> > > 'perf test' doesn't show any regression, now I'm running Vince Weaver's
> > > https://github.com/deater/perf_event_tests, storing the results with
> > > this patchset and then without, to do a diff, lets see...
> > So things improved! I'll re-run to see if these results are stable...
> tldr; No dmesg activity, no kernel splats, most tests passed, nothing
> noticeable when running with/without the patch with Vince's regression
> tests. So:
> Tested-by: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@redhat.com>
> Reported-by: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@redhat.com>
Too quick, now I'm testing it on top of torvalds/master, no PREEMPT_RT.
- Arnaldo
> - Arnaldo
>
> Further details:
>
> Without the patch:
>
> [root@nine perf_event_tests]# ./run_tests.sh | tee results.$(uname -r).new ; diff -u results.$(uname -r) results.$(uname -r).new
> --- results.6.8.0-rc7-rt6 2024-03-13 15:26:37.923323518 -0300
> +++ results.6.8.0-rc7-rt6.new 2024-03-13 15:32:43.983245095 -0300
> @@ -296,7 +296,7 @@
> + tests/rdpmc/rdpmc_validation
> Testing if userspace rdpmc reads give expected results... PASSED
> + tests/rdpmc/rdpmc_multiplexing
> - Testing if userspace rdpmc multiplexing works... PASSED
> + Testing if userspace rdpmc multiplexing works... FAILED
> + tests/rdpmc/rdpmc_reset
> Testing if resetting while using rdpmc works... PASSED
> + tests/rdpmc/rdpmc_group
> @@ -304,15 +304,15 @@
> + tests/rdpmc/rdpmc_attach
> Testing if rdpmc attach works... PASSED
> + tests/rdpmc/rdpmc_attach_cpu
> - Running on CPU 4
> + Running on CPU 0
> Testing if rdpmc behavior on attach CPU... PASSED
> + tests/rdpmc/rdpmc_attach_global_cpu
> - Running on CPU 6
> + Running on CPU 3
> Testing if rdpmc behavior on attach all procs on other CPU... FAILED
> + tests/rdpmc/rdpmc_attach_other_cpu
> - Measuring on CPU 5
> -Running on CPU 6
> -Measuring on CPU 5
> + Measuring on CPU 0
> +Running on CPU 3
> +Measuring on CPU 0
> Testing if rdpmc behavior on attach other CPU... FAILED
> + tests/rdpmc/rdpmc_multiattach
> Testing if rdpmc multi-attach works... PASSED
>
> A test flipped results.
>
> Trying again with a more compact output:
>
> [root@nine perf_event_tests]# ./run_tests.sh | tee results.$(uname -r).new ; diff -u results.$(uname -r) results.$(uname -r).new | grep ^[+-]
> --- results.6.8.0-rc7-rt6 2024-03-13 15:26:37.923323518 -0300
> +++ results.6.8.0-rc7-rt6.new 2024-03-13 17:06:34.944149451 -0300
> - Running on CPU 4
> -Testing if rdpmc behavior on attach CPU... PASSED
> - + tests/rdpmc/rdpmc_attach_global_cpu
> +Testing if rdpmc behavior on attach CPU... FAILED
> + + tests/rdpmc/rdpmc_attach_global_cpu
> + Running on CPU 0
> - Measuring on CPU 5
> -Running on CPU 6
> -Measuring on CPU 5
> + Measuring on CPU 7
> +Running on CPU 1
> +Measuring on CPU 7
> [root@nine perf_event_tests]#
>
> Since its that rdpmc that is now always failing without this patch
> series, lets try using that .new as the new baseline:
>
> [root@nine perf_event_tests]# ./run_tests.sh | tee results.$(uname -r).new2 ; diff -u results.$(uname -r).new results.$(uname -r).new2 | grep ^[+-]
> --- results.6.8.0-rc7-rt6.new 2024-03-13 17:06:34.944149451 -0300
> +++ results.6.8.0-rc7-rt6.new2 2024-03-13 17:08:41.438282558 -0300
> - Testing "branch-misses" generalized event... FAILED
> + Testing "branch-misses" generalized event... PASSED
> - Testing if userspace rdpmc multiplexing works... PASSED
> + Testing if userspace rdpmc multiplexing works... FAILED
> - Running on CPU 6
> -Testing if rdpmc behavior on attach CPU... FAILED
> + Running on CPU 2
> +Testing if rdpmc behavior on attach CPU... PASSED
> - Running on CPU 0
> + Running on CPU 2
> - Measuring on CPU 7
> -Running on CPU 1
> -Measuring on CPU 7
> + Measuring on CPU 2
> +Running on CPU 0
> +Measuring on CPU 2
> [root@nine perf_event_tests]#
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-03-13 20:14 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 26+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-03-12 18:01 [PATCH v2 0/4] perf: Make SIGTRAP and __perf_pending_irq() work on RT Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2024-03-12 18:01 ` [PATCH v2 1/4] perf: Move irq_work_queue() where the event is prepared Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2024-03-12 18:01 ` [PATCH v2 2/4] perf: Enqueue SIGTRAP always via task_work Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2024-03-13 14:41 ` Marco Elver
2024-03-14 9:35 ` Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2024-03-12 18:01 ` [PATCH v2 3/4] perf: Remove perf_swevent_get_recursion_context() from perf_pending_task() Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2024-03-12 18:01 ` [PATCH v2 4/4] perf: Split __perf_pending_irq() out of perf_pending_irq() Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2024-03-12 21:42 ` [PATCH v2 0/4] perf: Make SIGTRAP and __perf_pending_irq() work on RT Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2024-03-13 8:13 ` Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2024-03-13 13:28 ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2024-03-13 13:46 ` Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2024-03-13 14:06 ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2024-03-13 13:47 ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2024-03-13 14:15 ` Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2024-03-13 14:17 ` Marco Elver
2024-03-13 14:35 ` Marco Elver
2024-03-13 15:23 ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2024-03-13 18:14 ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2024-03-13 18:30 ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2024-03-13 20:12 ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2024-03-13 20:14 ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo [this message]
2024-03-14 9:10 ` Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2024-03-14 14:34 ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2024-03-14 21:22 ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2024-03-14 21:46 ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2024-03-15 7:41 ` Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=ZfIJIfqeI9tWnnS5@x1 \
--to=acme@kernel.org \
--cc=adrian.hunter@intel.com \
--cc=alexander.shishkin@linux.intel.com \
--cc=bigeasy@linutronix.de \
--cc=elver@google.com \
--cc=irogers@google.com \
--cc=jolsa@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-perf-users@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mark.rutland@arm.com \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=namhyung@kernel.org \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=vincent.weaver@maine.edu \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).