From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
To: Sandipan Das <sandipan.das@amd.com>
Cc: linux-perf-users@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
x86@kernel.org, peterz@infradead.org, acme@kernel.org,
namhyung@kernel.org, mark.rutland@arm.com,
alexander.shishkin@linux.intel.com, jolsa@kernel.org,
adrian.hunter@intel.com, tglx@linutronix.de, bp@alien8.de,
seanjc@google.com, pbonzini@redhat.com, eranian@google.com,
irogers@google.com, ravi.bangoria@amd.com,
ananth.narayan@amd.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 1/2] x86/cpufeatures: Add dedicated feature word for CPUID leaf 0x80000022[EAX]
Date: Tue, 19 Mar 2024 11:17:55 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <ZflmU+H2Lt2I0VOq@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <846eebace0aea3a600b81b06bddd0024e5ac1350.1710836172.git.sandipan.das@amd.com>
* Sandipan Das <sandipan.das@amd.com> wrote:
> Move the existing scattered performance monitoring related feature bits
> from CPUID leaf 0x80000022[EAX] into a dedicated word since additional
> bits will be defined from the same leaf in the future. This includes
> X86_FEATURE_PERFMON_V2 and X86_FEATURE_AMD_LBR_V2.
>
> Signed-off-by: Sandipan Das <sandipan.das@amd.com>
> ---
> arch/x86/include/asm/cpufeature.h | 7 +++++--
> arch/x86/include/asm/cpufeatures.h | 10 +++++++---
> arch/x86/include/asm/disabled-features.h | 3 ++-
> arch/x86/include/asm/required-features.h | 3 ++-
> arch/x86/kernel/cpu/common.c | 3 +++
> arch/x86/kernel/cpu/scattered.c | 2 --
> arch/x86/kvm/cpuid.c | 5 +----
> arch/x86/kvm/reverse_cpuid.h | 1 -
> 8 files changed, 20 insertions(+), 14 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/x86/include/asm/cpufeature.h b/arch/x86/include/asm/cpufeature.h
> index a1273698fc43..68dd27d60748 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/include/asm/cpufeature.h
> +++ b/arch/x86/include/asm/cpufeature.h
> @@ -33,6 +33,7 @@ enum cpuid_leafs
> CPUID_7_EDX,
> CPUID_8000_001F_EAX,
> CPUID_8000_0021_EAX,
> + CPUID_8000_0022_EAX,
> #define X86_FEATURE_SYSCALL32 ( 3*32+14) /* "" syscall in IA32 userspace */
> #define X86_FEATURE_SYSENTER32 ( 3*32+15) /* "" sysenter in IA32 userspace */
> #define X86_FEATURE_REP_GOOD ( 3*32+16) /* REP microcode works well */
> -#define X86_FEATURE_AMD_LBR_V2 ( 3*32+17) /* AMD Last Branch Record Extension Version 2 */
> +/* FREE! ( 3*32+17) */
> #define X86_FEATURE_CLEAR_CPU_BUF ( 3*32+18) /* "" Clear CPU buffers using VERW */
> #define X86_FEATURE_ACC_POWER ( 3*32+19) /* AMD Accumulated Power Mechanism */
> #define X86_FEATURE_NOPL ( 3*32+20) /* The NOPL (0F 1F) instructions */
> @@ -209,7 +209,7 @@
> #define X86_FEATURE_SSBD ( 7*32+17) /* Speculative Store Bypass Disable */
> #define X86_FEATURE_MBA ( 7*32+18) /* Memory Bandwidth Allocation */
> #define X86_FEATURE_RSB_CTXSW ( 7*32+19) /* "" Fill RSB on context switches */
> -#define X86_FEATURE_PERFMON_V2 ( 7*32+20) /* AMD Performance Monitoring Version 2 */
> +/* FREE! ( 7*32+20) */
> #define X86_FEATURE_USE_IBPB ( 7*32+21) /* "" Indirect Branch Prediction Barrier enabled */
> #define X86_FEATURE_USE_IBRS_FW ( 7*32+22) /* "" Use IBRS during runtime firmware calls */
> #define X86_FEATURE_SPEC_STORE_BYPASS_DISABLE ( 7*32+23) /* "" Disable Speculative Store Bypass. */
> @@ -459,6 +459,10 @@
> #define X86_FEATURE_IBPB_BRTYPE (20*32+28) /* "" MSR_PRED_CMD[IBPB] flushes all branch type predictions */
> #define X86_FEATURE_SRSO_NO (20*32+29) /* "" CPU is not affected by SRSO */
>
> +/* AMD-defined performance monitoring features, CPUID level 0x80000022 (EAX), word 21 */
> +#define X86_FEATURE_PERFMON_V2 (21*32+ 0) /* AMD Performance Monitoring Version 2 */
> +#define X86_FEATURE_AMD_LBR_V2 (21*32+ 1) /* AMD Last Branch Record Extension Version 2 */
Thank you! I presume you tested both patches on the relevant system
with the X86_FEATURE_AMD_LBR_PMC_FREEZE bug?
Thanks,
Ingo
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-03-19 10:18 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-03-19 8:18 [PATCH v4 0/2] perf/x86/amd: Fix for LBR Freeze Sandipan Das
2024-03-19 8:18 ` [PATCH v4 1/2] x86/cpufeatures: Add dedicated feature word for CPUID leaf 0x80000022[EAX] Sandipan Das
2024-03-19 10:17 ` Ingo Molnar [this message]
2024-03-19 10:36 ` Sandipan Das
2024-03-19 13:00 ` Ingo Molnar
2024-03-19 8:18 ` [PATCH v4 2/2] perf/x86/amd/lbr: Use freeze based on availability Sandipan Das
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=ZflmU+H2Lt2I0VOq@gmail.com \
--to=mingo@kernel.org \
--cc=acme@kernel.org \
--cc=adrian.hunter@intel.com \
--cc=alexander.shishkin@linux.intel.com \
--cc=ananth.narayan@amd.com \
--cc=bp@alien8.de \
--cc=eranian@google.com \
--cc=irogers@google.com \
--cc=jolsa@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-perf-users@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mark.rutland@arm.com \
--cc=namhyung@kernel.org \
--cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=ravi.bangoria@amd.com \
--cc=sandipan.das@amd.com \
--cc=seanjc@google.com \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=x86@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).