From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from smtp.kernel.org (aws-us-west-2-korg-mail-1.web.codeaurora.org [10.30.226.201]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9354453378; Wed, 20 Mar 2024 15:44:29 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=10.30.226.201 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1710949469; cv=none; b=DcxOw/klk50qfaTKYTQgsg0luvba7fArk4udMr4YzDy5WeotMNiTu/4uM1OYtvhprxnktSZYuWvdkij4bC8Hq9CVAVExjfxik5Upg3jdFTSsRm/Zx3w5TrCTWBpGJcaBCo0jSdZog/LqyqpLVsKdADmvuDU8YPoWIEVmIE1v+IQ= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1710949469; c=relaxed/simple; bh=a0za4WCCKbmt2ceizF1eT8CjZalN0VYRpB7LLv7Opm8=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:References:MIME-Version: Content-Type:Content-Disposition:In-Reply-To; b=FBjXnO1BaCiVWMGbhs0MTY6HP5l40/ZEKL1iXr3K7eyirghVDJmvvHVHxI2NP3S8tOrcFHWPL5ezfSGWvG/kQxDAn88vLSSorkl116h6FODMOHSRLaHG+cNDCRXj4yYMrmlCFrS42kzMwG96fuSoZXYHgiRZtXb66fbocgAu6eY= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b=tO2L/JJv; arc=none smtp.client-ip=10.30.226.201 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b="tO2L/JJv" Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id BDE94C43390; Wed, 20 Mar 2024 15:44:28 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=k20201202; t=1710949469; bh=a0za4WCCKbmt2ceizF1eT8CjZalN0VYRpB7LLv7Opm8=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:References:In-Reply-To:From; b=tO2L/JJvVcqFMoZ+uhlo2XCL/9B3it6J2Pn3Sdp0CpVsBr6CwpL0y/RarhJSvVW6F piqDwxgFl8MlKsMBAZ72TakOPmBzYn6pFJUoYxXHgW+pjEUDyEjFKrgULXlveBBaQU 8/0PeP/FSj5H50ry9ZLDOIdKtL6eRuQQY+0/IeRjhz2qMrt1R60cCcopj+e0Qibhk6 miTioizB19R2Z2eN8mxhIEs1CGCT9aHR6CR1lQt5Chbk/y+zRw1DbZCSAXokwUVuyH CqSMALkdGU/7d/fUxZspmwXyIzuBzac25dxR8WqUcsHWEr4iDrGTPSWltB6GjL+3xI pHCsH75UVFddg== Date: Wed, 20 Mar 2024 12:44:26 -0300 From: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo To: Ian Rogers Cc: Peter Zijlstra , Ingo Molnar , Namhyung Kim , Mark Rutland , Alexander Shishkin , Jiri Olsa , Adrian Hunter , linux-perf-users@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/2] perf: Suggest inbuilt commands for unknown command Message-ID: References: <20240301201306.2680986-1-irogers@google.com> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-perf-users@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit In-Reply-To: On Wed, Mar 20, 2024 at 12:41:45PM -0300, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo wrote: > ⬢[acme@toolbox perf-tools-next]$ perf raccord > perf: 'raccord' is not a perf-command. See 'perf --help'. This works with the second patch. - Arnaldo > ⬢[acme@toolbox perf-tools-next]$ perf ricord > perf: 'ricord' is not a perf-command. See 'perf --help'. > > Did you mean this? > record > ⬢[acme@toolbox perf-tools-next]$ perf ricord > perf: 'ricord' is not a perf-command. See 'perf --help'. > > Did you mean this? > record > ⬢[acme@toolbox perf-tools-next]$ > > So I'll add that and go on from there. > > - Arnaldo