From: Andi Kleen <ak@linux.intel.com>
To: Ian Rogers <irogers@google.com>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>,
Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@kernel.org>,
Namhyung Kim <namhyung@kernel.org>,
Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>,
Alexander Shishkin <alexander.shishkin@linux.intel.com>,
Jiri Olsa <jolsa@kernel.org>,
Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@intel.com>,
Kan Liang <kan.liang@linux.intel.com>,
linux-perf-users@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1] perf metrics: Remove the "No_group" metric group
Date: Wed, 3 Apr 2024 11:44:04 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <Zg2jdJ3-LNRkL95T@tassilo> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20240403164636.3429091-1-irogers@google.com>
On Wed, Apr 03, 2024 at 09:46:36AM -0700, Ian Rogers wrote:
> Rather than place metrics without a metric group in "No_group" place
> them in a a metric group that is their name. Still allow such metrics
> to be selected if "No_group" is passed, this change just impacts perf
> list.
But what's the point of it? It will just make perf list more verbose,
but I don't see any advantage.
-Andi
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-04-03 18:44 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-04-03 16:46 [PATCH v1] perf metrics: Remove the "No_group" metric group Ian Rogers
2024-04-03 17:59 ` Liang, Kan
2024-04-03 18:31 ` Ian Rogers
2024-04-03 18:57 ` Liang, Kan
2024-04-03 20:26 ` Ian Rogers
2024-04-04 20:29 ` Liang, Kan
2024-04-05 1:16 ` Ian Rogers
2024-04-05 14:44 ` Liang, Kan
2024-04-03 18:44 ` Andi Kleen [this message]
2024-04-03 20:23 ` Ian Rogers
2024-04-05 14:45 ` Liang, Kan
2024-04-08 14:51 ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=Zg2jdJ3-LNRkL95T@tassilo \
--to=ak@linux.intel.com \
--cc=acme@kernel.org \
--cc=adrian.hunter@intel.com \
--cc=alexander.shishkin@linux.intel.com \
--cc=irogers@google.com \
--cc=jolsa@kernel.org \
--cc=kan.liang@linux.intel.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-perf-users@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mark.rutland@arm.com \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=namhyung@kernel.org \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).