From: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@kernel.org>
To: Namhyung Kim <namhyung@kernel.org>
Cc: Ian Rogers <irogers@google.com>,
Kan Liang <kan.liang@linux.intel.com>,
Jiri Olsa <jolsa@kernel.org>,
Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@intel.com>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
linux-perf-users@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCHSET 0/9] perf annotate: More memory footprint reduction
Date: Mon, 8 Apr 2024 10:56:22 -0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <ZhP3N-oBezFN1ISW@x1> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20240404175716.1225482-1-namhyung@kernel.org>
On Thu, Apr 04, 2024 at 10:57:07AM -0700, Namhyung Kim wrote:
> Hello,
>
> This work is continuation of the previous work to reduce the memory
> usage in symbol and annotation structures. Basically I moved some
> fields in the annotation which consume spaces in the struct symbol
> which is allocated regardless if the symbol has a sample or not when
> annotation is enabled.
>
> With this change applied, the struct annotation only has two members -
> annotated_source and annotated_branch. The next step would be to
> remove the struct annotation and to have a hash table from symbol to
> each annotated struct directly.
>
> No function changes intended.
>
> The code is available at perf/annotate-diet-v3 branch in
>
> git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/namhyung/linux-perf.git
Thanks, applied to perf-tools-next,
- Arnaldo
prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-04-08 13:56 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-04-04 17:57 [PATCHSET 0/9] perf annotate: More memory footprint reduction Namhyung Kim
2024-04-04 17:57 ` [PATCH 1/9] perf annotate: Fix annotation_calc_lines() Namhyung Kim
2024-04-04 17:57 ` [PATCH 2/9] perf annotate: Staticize some local functions Namhyung Kim
2024-04-04 17:57 ` [PATCH 3/9] perf annotate: Introduce annotated_source__get_line() Namhyung Kim
2024-04-04 17:57 ` [PATCH 4/9] perf annotate: Check annotation lines more efficiently Namhyung Kim
2024-04-04 17:57 ` [PATCH 5/9] perf annotate: Get rid of offsets array Namhyung Kim
2024-04-04 17:57 ` [PATCH 6/9] perf annotate: Move widths struct to annotated_source Namhyung Kim
2024-04-04 17:57 ` [PATCH 7/9] perf annotate: Move max_jump_sources " Namhyung Kim
2024-04-04 17:57 ` [PATCH 8/9] perf annotate: Move nr_events " Namhyung Kim
2024-04-04 17:57 ` [PATCH 9/9] perf annotate: Move start field " Namhyung Kim
2024-04-05 23:41 ` Ian Rogers
2024-04-05 23:44 ` [PATCHSET 0/9] perf annotate: More memory footprint reduction Ian Rogers
2024-04-08 13:56 ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=ZhP3N-oBezFN1ISW@x1 \
--to=acme@kernel.org \
--cc=adrian.hunter@intel.com \
--cc=irogers@google.com \
--cc=jolsa@kernel.org \
--cc=kan.liang@linux.intel.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-perf-users@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@kernel.org \
--cc=namhyung@kernel.org \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).