From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from smtp.kernel.org (aws-us-west-2-korg-mail-1.web.codeaurora.org [10.30.226.201]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 03B4E1CD21; Mon, 8 Apr 2024 14:51:06 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=10.30.226.201 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1712587867; cv=none; b=hrpGbAMIdvlQjvzzCI2pnzxBdZD/glskzBo98lPsusRjUfV0+ov5GzdzAp+FfwYx3EaqxenAObw3q8ozToHOr9gAweOroYkAmW7SnbHa0Yzck0SDAp3dJcaNU5UxajbdJ54DMYNwCJ+Rz+8mbSARPdxyfks3goQl8F1SygrH21A= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1712587867; c=relaxed/simple; bh=ROVMmw8JAVlfeAbn9frbLivPaMaLeic75F5rRmUOPYs=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:References:MIME-Version: Content-Type:Content-Disposition:In-Reply-To; b=ZMWde7ZJe6OcdY8e8lgUcTjgG2O5JD2DpD4NnlrYspGHI5BjFf7Ue4ryjPebkeD1Yf3u2O22fvBRmPD2UNmJzLAjC0LT0qHjSc3rxEirkjGdQAjmYbygTWJAC2hF+l0ckmNZq0FnfKpSY8UnXlZwLg92RBGEvOihB7Xrj8pty/U= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b=Xh2Y1AE4; arc=none smtp.client-ip=10.30.226.201 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b="Xh2Y1AE4" Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 1C011C433C7; Mon, 8 Apr 2024 14:51:05 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=k20201202; t=1712587866; bh=ROVMmw8JAVlfeAbn9frbLivPaMaLeic75F5rRmUOPYs=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:References:In-Reply-To:From; b=Xh2Y1AE4NFBOOykqNwxsDWTV5SlBHlnyXPyxZrP1LpwudwYDRoL2HPJfC+45uFMhv kzvUg3nMucWx1SHLUnffJm+RJ2cbCueZFS4ySZ6bfWvcZ/3SkDmM+4MCpQPZm2UKKL 9cL9V98QMONV6U0l5Zkgk0mUeQa1QfIHaYqC+onTuzcCGhBDzTTZv/8zCMBKKLWAF4 FIQs8y7IfzUcRUFWtYIvJ5CxQpjUi1MZnEpZsk8VWK0wOWEe7xCiO/oTZTWj0fFmjO 38Ot4yNR4lf54ZomspbXIMYwFXE0o1vE6d9vUkw9G8iZFo3plku0XSadIQqOz5ah7E oMSr8YuLKFn5A== Date: Mon, 8 Apr 2024 11:51:02 -0300 From: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo To: "Liang, Kan" Cc: Ian Rogers , Peter Zijlstra , Ingo Molnar , Namhyung Kim , Mark Rutland , Alexander Shishkin , Jiri Olsa , Adrian Hunter , linux-perf-users@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Andi Kleen Subject: Re: [PATCH v1] perf metrics: Remove the "No_group" metric group Message-ID: References: <20240403164636.3429091-1-irogers@google.com> <8e60ccd6-907e-445c-85e0-785b1426e98c@linux.intel.com> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-perf-users@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <8e60ccd6-907e-445c-85e0-785b1426e98c@linux.intel.com> On Fri, Apr 05, 2024 at 10:45:59AM -0400, Liang, Kan wrote: > > > On 2024-04-03 12:46 p.m., Ian Rogers wrote: > > Rather than place metrics without a metric group in "No_group" place > > them in a a metric group that is their name. Still allow such metrics > > to be selected if "No_group" is passed, this change just impacts perf > > list. > > > > Signed-off-by: Ian Rogers > > Reviewed-by: Kan Liang Thanks, applied to perf-tools-next, - Arnaldo