From: Frederic Weisbecker <frederic@kernel.org>
To: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@linutronix.de>
Cc: linux-perf-users@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@intel.com>,
Alexander Shishkin <alexander.shishkin@linux.intel.com>,
Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@kernel.org>,
Ian Rogers <irogers@google.com>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>,
Jiri Olsa <jolsa@kernel.org>, Marco Elver <elver@google.com>,
Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>,
Namhyung Kim <namhyung@kernel.org>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 3/4] perf: Remove perf_swevent_get_recursion_context() from perf_pending_task().
Date: Tue, 9 Apr 2024 00:06:00 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <ZhRqSEbyd1rqVwfN@pavilion.home> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20240322065208.60456-4-bigeasy@linutronix.de>
Le Fri, Mar 22, 2024 at 07:48:23AM +0100, Sebastian Andrzej Siewior a écrit :
> perf_swevent_get_recursion_context() is supposed to avoid recursion.
> This requires to remain on the same CPU in order to decrement/ increment
> the same counter. This is done by using preempt_disable(). Having
> preemption disabled while sending a signal leads to locking problems on
> PREEMPT_RT because sighand, a spinlock_t, becomes a sleeping lock.
>
> This callback runs in task context and currently delivers only a signal
> to "itself". Any kind of recusrion protection in this context is not
> required.
>
> Remove recursion protection in perf_pending_task().
>
> Tested-by: Marco Elver <elver@google.com>
> Tested-by: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@redhat.com>
> Reported-by: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@redhat.com>
> Signed-off-by: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@linutronix.de>
> ---
> kernel/events/core.c | 12 ------------
> 1 file changed, 12 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/kernel/events/core.c b/kernel/events/core.c
> index e0b2da8de485f..5400f7ed2f98b 100644
> --- a/kernel/events/core.c
> +++ b/kernel/events/core.c
> @@ -6785,14 +6785,6 @@ static void perf_pending_irq(struct irq_work *entry)
> static void perf_pending_task(struct callback_head *head)
> {
> struct perf_event *event = container_of(head, struct perf_event, pending_task);
> - int rctx;
> -
> - /*
> - * If we 'fail' here, that's OK, it means recursion is already disabled
> - * and we won't recurse 'further'.
> - */
> - preempt_disable_notrace();
> - rctx = perf_swevent_get_recursion_context();
>
> if (event->pending_work) {
> event->pending_work = 0;
> @@ -6800,10 +6792,6 @@ static void perf_pending_task(struct callback_head *head)
> local_dec(&event->ctx->nr_pending);
> }
>
> - if (rctx >= 0)
> - perf_swevent_put_recursion_context(rctx);
> - preempt_enable_notrace();
Well, if a software event happens during perf_sigtrap(), the task work
may be requeued endlessly and the task may get stuck in task_work_run()...
> -
> put_event(event);
> }
>
> --
> 2.43.0
>
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-04-08 22:06 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 25+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-03-22 6:48 [PATCH v3 0/4] perf: Make SIGTRAP and __perf_pending_irq() work on RT Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2024-03-22 6:48 ` [PATCH v3 1/4] perf: Move irq_work_queue() where the event is prepared Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2024-03-22 6:48 ` [PATCH v3 2/4] perf: Enqueue SIGTRAP always via task_work Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2024-04-08 21:29 ` Frederic Weisbecker
2024-04-09 8:57 ` Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2024-04-09 12:36 ` Frederic Weisbecker
2024-04-09 13:47 ` Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2024-04-10 11:37 ` Frederic Weisbecker
2024-04-10 13:47 ` Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2024-04-10 14:00 ` Frederic Weisbecker
2024-04-10 14:06 ` Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2024-04-10 14:42 ` Frederic Weisbecker
2024-04-10 14:48 ` Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2024-04-10 14:50 ` Frederic Weisbecker
2024-03-22 6:48 ` [PATCH v3 3/4] perf: Remove perf_swevent_get_recursion_context() from perf_pending_task() Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2024-04-08 22:06 ` Frederic Weisbecker [this message]
2024-04-09 6:25 ` Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2024-04-09 10:35 ` Frederic Weisbecker
2024-04-09 10:54 ` Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2024-04-09 12:00 ` Frederic Weisbecker
2024-04-09 13:33 ` Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2024-04-10 10:38 ` Frederic Weisbecker
2024-04-10 12:51 ` Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2024-04-10 13:58 ` Frederic Weisbecker
2024-03-22 6:48 ` [PATCH v3 4/4] perf: Split __perf_pending_irq() out of perf_pending_irq() Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=ZhRqSEbyd1rqVwfN@pavilion.home \
--to=frederic@kernel.org \
--cc=acme@kernel.org \
--cc=acme@redhat.com \
--cc=adrian.hunter@intel.com \
--cc=alexander.shishkin@linux.intel.com \
--cc=bigeasy@linutronix.de \
--cc=elver@google.com \
--cc=irogers@google.com \
--cc=jolsa@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-perf-users@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mark.rutland@arm.com \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=namhyung@kernel.org \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).