linux-perf-users.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Frederic Weisbecker <frederic@kernel.org>
To: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@linutronix.de>
Cc: linux-perf-users@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@intel.com>,
	Alexander Shishkin <alexander.shishkin@linux.intel.com>,
	Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@kernel.org>,
	Ian Rogers <irogers@google.com>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>,
	Jiri Olsa <jolsa@kernel.org>, Marco Elver <elver@google.com>,
	Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>,
	Namhyung Kim <namhyung@kernel.org>,
	Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
	Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 3/4] perf: Remove perf_swevent_get_recursion_context() from perf_pending_task().
Date: Tue, 9 Apr 2024 12:35:46 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <ZhUaAjhQXN6ahtpS@localhost.localdomain> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20240409062501.h4rA_ck4@linutronix.de>

Le Tue, Apr 09, 2024 at 08:25:01AM +0200, Sebastian Andrzej Siewior a écrit :
> On 2024-04-09 00:06:00 [+0200], Frederic Weisbecker wrote:
> > > diff --git a/kernel/events/core.c b/kernel/events/core.c
> > > index e0b2da8de485f..5400f7ed2f98b 100644
> > > --- a/kernel/events/core.c
> > > +++ b/kernel/events/core.c
> > > @@ -6785,14 +6785,6 @@ static void perf_pending_irq(struct irq_work *entry)
> > >  static void perf_pending_task(struct callback_head *head)
> > >  {
> > >  	struct perf_event *event = container_of(head, struct perf_event, pending_task);
> > > -	int rctx;
> > > -
> > > -	/*
> > > -	 * If we 'fail' here, that's OK, it means recursion is already disabled
> > > -	 * and we won't recurse 'further'.
> > > -	 */
> > > -	preempt_disable_notrace();
> > > -	rctx = perf_swevent_get_recursion_context();
> > >  
> > >  	if (event->pending_work) {
> > >  		event->pending_work = 0;
> > > @@ -6800,10 +6792,6 @@ static void perf_pending_task(struct callback_head *head)
> > >  		local_dec(&event->ctx->nr_pending);
> > >  	}
> > >  
> > > -	if (rctx >= 0)
> > > -		perf_swevent_put_recursion_context(rctx);
> > > -	preempt_enable_notrace();
> > 
> > Well, if a software event happens during perf_sigtrap(), the task work
> > may be requeued endlessly and the task may get stuck in task_work_run()...
> 
> The last time I checked it had no users in the task context. How would
> that happen?

I guess many tracepoint events would do the trick. Such as trace_lock_acquire()
for example.

Thanks.

  reply	other threads:[~2024-04-09 10:35 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 25+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2024-03-22  6:48 [PATCH v3 0/4] perf: Make SIGTRAP and __perf_pending_irq() work on RT Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2024-03-22  6:48 ` [PATCH v3 1/4] perf: Move irq_work_queue() where the event is prepared Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2024-03-22  6:48 ` [PATCH v3 2/4] perf: Enqueue SIGTRAP always via task_work Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2024-04-08 21:29   ` Frederic Weisbecker
2024-04-09  8:57     ` Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2024-04-09 12:36       ` Frederic Weisbecker
2024-04-09 13:47         ` Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2024-04-10 11:37           ` Frederic Weisbecker
2024-04-10 13:47             ` Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2024-04-10 14:00               ` Frederic Weisbecker
2024-04-10 14:06                 ` Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2024-04-10 14:42                   ` Frederic Weisbecker
2024-04-10 14:48                     ` Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2024-04-10 14:50                       ` Frederic Weisbecker
2024-03-22  6:48 ` [PATCH v3 3/4] perf: Remove perf_swevent_get_recursion_context() from perf_pending_task() Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2024-04-08 22:06   ` Frederic Weisbecker
2024-04-09  6:25     ` Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2024-04-09 10:35       ` Frederic Weisbecker [this message]
2024-04-09 10:54         ` Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2024-04-09 12:00           ` Frederic Weisbecker
2024-04-09 13:33             ` Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2024-04-10 10:38               ` Frederic Weisbecker
2024-04-10 12:51                 ` Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2024-04-10 13:58                   ` Frederic Weisbecker
2024-03-22  6:48 ` [PATCH v3 4/4] perf: Split __perf_pending_irq() out of perf_pending_irq() Sebastian Andrzej Siewior

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=ZhUaAjhQXN6ahtpS@localhost.localdomain \
    --to=frederic@kernel.org \
    --cc=acme@kernel.org \
    --cc=acme@redhat.com \
    --cc=adrian.hunter@intel.com \
    --cc=alexander.shishkin@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=bigeasy@linutronix.de \
    --cc=elver@google.com \
    --cc=irogers@google.com \
    --cc=jolsa@kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-perf-users@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mark.rutland@arm.com \
    --cc=mingo@redhat.com \
    --cc=namhyung@kernel.org \
    --cc=peterz@infradead.org \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).