From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
To: Dhananjay Ugwekar <Dhananjay.Ugwekar@amd.com>
Cc: tglx@linutronix.de, bp@alien8.de, dave.hansen@linux.intel.com,
x86@kernel.org, peterz@infradead.org, mingo@redhat.com,
ananth.narayan@amd.com, gautham.shenoy@amd.com,
linux-perf-users@vger.kernel.org,
linux-hardening@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
sandipan.das@amd.com, alexander.shishkin@linux.intel.com,
irogers@google.com, gustavoars@kernel.org,
kprateek.nayak@amd.com, ravi.bangoria@amd.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] perf/x86/rapl: Fix the energy-pkg event for AMD CPUs
Date: Fri, 3 May 2024 11:54:26 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <ZjS0Uio+nvZLLmyb@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20240502095115.177713-3-Dhananjay.Ugwekar@amd.com>
* Dhananjay Ugwekar <Dhananjay.Ugwekar@amd.com> wrote:
> After commit ("x86/cpu/topology: Add support for the AMD 0x80000026 leaf"),
> on AMD processors that support extended CPUID leaf 0x80000026, the
> topology_die_cpumask() and topology_logical_die_id() macros, no longer
> return the package cpumask and package id, instead they return the CCD
> (Core Complex Die) mask and id respectively. This leads to the energy-pkg
> event scope to be modified to CCD instead of package.
>
> Replacing these macros with their package counterparts fixes the
> energy-pkg event for AMD CPUs.
>
> However due to the difference between the scope of energy-pkg event for
> Intel and AMD CPUs, we have to replace these macros conditionally only for
> AMD CPUs.
>
> On a 12 CCD 1 Package AMD Zen4 Genoa machine:
>
> Before:
> $ cat /sys/devices/power/cpumask
> 0,8,16,24,32,40,48,56,64,72,80,88.
>
> The expected cpumask here is supposed to be just "0", as it is a package
> scope event, only one CPU will be collecting the event for all the CPUs in
> the package.
>
> After:
> $ cat /sys/devices/power/cpumask
> 0
>
> Signed-off-by: Dhananjay Ugwekar <Dhananjay.Ugwekar@amd.com>
> Fixes: 63edbaa48a57 ("x86/cpu/topology: Add support for the AMD 0x80000026 leaf")
> ---
> arch/x86/events/rapl.c | 30 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++----
> 1 file changed, 26 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/x86/events/rapl.c b/arch/x86/events/rapl.c
> index 46e673585560..d77bf7959a43 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/events/rapl.c
> +++ b/arch/x86/events/rapl.c
> @@ -102,6 +102,10 @@ static struct perf_pmu_events_attr event_attr_##v = { \
> .event_str = str, \
> };
>
> +#define rapl_pmu_is_pkg_scope() \
> + (boot_cpu_data.x86_vendor == X86_VENDOR_AMD || \
> + boot_cpu_data.x86_vendor == X86_VENDOR_HYGON)
> +
> struct rapl_pmu {
> raw_spinlock_t lock;
> int n_active;
> @@ -139,9 +143,21 @@ static unsigned int rapl_cntr_mask;
> static u64 rapl_timer_ms;
> static struct perf_msr *rapl_msrs;
>
> +static inline unsigned int get_rapl_pmu_idx(int cpu)
> +{
> + return rapl_pmu_is_pkg_scope() ? topology_logical_package_id(cpu) :
> + topology_logical_die_id(cpu);
> +}
> +
> +static inline cpumask_t *get_rapl_pmu_cpumask(int cpu)
> +{
> + return rapl_pmu_is_pkg_scope() ? topology_core_cpumask(cpu) :
> + topology_die_cpumask(cpu);
> +}
Note that this breaks the build with this config:
https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20240503/202405030828.RgFuznL9-lkp@intel.com/config
I've removed the commit from perf/core for now.
Thanks,
Ingo
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-05-03 9:54 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-05-02 9:51 [PATCH 0/2] Fix energy-pkg event for AMD CPUs Dhananjay Ugwekar
2024-05-02 9:51 ` [PATCH 1/2] perf/x86/rapl: Rename maxdie to nr_rapl_pmu and dieid to rapl_pmu_idx Dhananjay Ugwekar
2024-05-02 9:51 ` [PATCH 2/2] perf/x86/rapl: Fix the energy-pkg event for AMD CPUs Dhananjay Ugwekar
2024-05-03 9:54 ` Ingo Molnar [this message]
2024-05-03 10:07 ` Dhananjay Ugwekar
2024-05-04 4:09 ` [PATCH v2 " Dhananjay Ugwekar
2024-05-27 6:27 ` Dhananjay Ugwekar
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=ZjS0Uio+nvZLLmyb@gmail.com \
--to=mingo@kernel.org \
--cc=Dhananjay.Ugwekar@amd.com \
--cc=alexander.shishkin@linux.intel.com \
--cc=ananth.narayan@amd.com \
--cc=bp@alien8.de \
--cc=dave.hansen@linux.intel.com \
--cc=gautham.shenoy@amd.com \
--cc=gustavoars@kernel.org \
--cc=irogers@google.com \
--cc=kprateek.nayak@amd.com \
--cc=linux-hardening@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-perf-users@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=ravi.bangoria@amd.com \
--cc=sandipan.das@amd.com \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=x86@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).