From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from smtp.kernel.org (aws-us-west-2-korg-mail-1.web.codeaurora.org [10.30.226.201]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 87BA615FCF0; Tue, 7 May 2024 14:53:00 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=10.30.226.201 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1715093580; cv=none; b=aYyywyqMCe4O/VjAzflFYHOt5cZ0rdU4PRmJuP4HwWjW1ilxcy6/J9tdlZ3PK2lgETpr+nF2b763OSH26D08PJfOSMoXTe1fREoMdtt8mKkqrkIWzZJinq33RF9xdvw3H5JNvZ+e9rxMUPz11C2/WxjChi+KZjVOAuqYP1MB2b4= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1715093580; c=relaxed/simple; bh=G2fd/G6gHoEl3QR40FzwdMkgc9pQE2sWSv49OHbI4d4=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:References:MIME-Version: Content-Type:Content-Disposition:In-Reply-To; b=jw6988NMg/jlYH/iJ3Z5OiM/L0q1Jvur3tBXNUQD0YfUtj6uuHMoGLAx3Gm1MnobHgYTcnPwY8Sj38rGqHN+VCeBsUTI5hlf+HNzIt7cyCNXuiPFwT/CgnBL9DZ11s2oog8NtggiYpFRZxnRjav4+5WxG4+H9ti3/Iuae/KMX70= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b=JvNPgBvv; arc=none smtp.client-ip=10.30.226.201 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b="JvNPgBvv" Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id B756BC4AF63; Tue, 7 May 2024 14:52:59 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=k20201202; t=1715093580; bh=G2fd/G6gHoEl3QR40FzwdMkgc9pQE2sWSv49OHbI4d4=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:References:In-Reply-To:From; b=JvNPgBvvlZTMle2tmEciAGw4tri1AC80m9Gm4LuqqYzLzoD5yn/+U4w1lq0hVsEPN NuNmtC1elTWZev4XncK6IHzUFAxmbg4LwnEV2c9vAfCl5HJiireagp/Ej8oPJKGuul /6wHXPs9HT5lEn/+xwvxUOqeUwCCUpDzN95f5CsNZGT/7Chke0GafGBJQAcZez/uUq 7poyjgcEqoT6wr6EBEJHitW+ROmlFfZzQBtREzVs2C9YM3212ZkdWRARw8oLHMVc5H OynWw14pkd5xCPEp01lHucmRHRS0CLawCT4nnn2ZQ71hfKMrdUUgBFHkFabTYqEwrO EdReYeVrSrymw== Date: Tue, 7 May 2024 11:52:57 -0300 From: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo To: Namhyung Kim Cc: Athira Rajeev , jolsa@kernel.org, adrian.hunter@intel.com, irogers@google.com, segher@kernel.crashing.org, christophe.leroy@csgroup.eu, linux-perf-users@vger.kernel.org, linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org, maddy@linux.ibm.com, kjain@linux.ibm.com, disgoel@linux.vnet.ibm.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, akanksha@linux.ibm.com Subject: Re: [PATCH V2 3/9] tools/perf: Fix a comment about multi_regs in extract_reg_offset function Message-ID: References: <20240506121906.76639-1-atrajeev@linux.vnet.ibm.com> <20240506121906.76639-4-atrajeev@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-perf-users@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit In-Reply-To: On Mon, May 06, 2024 at 09:40:15PM -0700, Namhyung Kim wrote: > On Mon, May 6, 2024 at 5:19 AM Athira Rajeev > wrote: > > > > Fix a comment in function which explains how multi_regs field gets set > > for an instruction. In the example, "mov %rsi, 8(%rbx,%rcx,4)", the > > comment mistakenly referred to "dst_multi_regs = 0". Correct it to use > > "src_multi_regs = 0" > > > > Signed-off-by: Athira Rajeev > > Acked-by: Namhyung Kim Cherry picked this one into perf-tools-next. Thanks, - Arnaldo