linux-perf-users.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>
To: Anshuman Khandual <anshuman.khandual@arm.com>
Cc: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, will@kernel.org,
	catalin.marinas@arm.com, Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>,
	James Clark <james.clark@arm.com>, Rob Herring <robh@kernel.org>,
	Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org>,
	Suzuki Poulose <suzuki.poulose@arm.com>,
	Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>,
	Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@kernel.org>,
	linux-perf-users@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH V17 1/9] arm64/sysreg: Add BRBE registers and fields
Date: Tue, 21 May 2024 14:24:34 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <Zkygkt2a9HBHfmeu@J2N7QTR9R3> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20240405024639.1179064-2-anshuman.khandual@arm.com>

On Fri, Apr 05, 2024 at 08:16:31AM +0530, Anshuman Khandual wrote:
> This adds BRBE related register definitions and various other related field
> macros there in. These will be used subsequently in a BRBE driver, which is
> being added later on. While here, this drops redundant register definitions
> from the header i.e (arch/arm64/include/asm/sysreg.h).
> 
> BRBINFx_EL1_TYPE_IMPDEF_TRAP_EL3 register field value has been derived from
> latest ARM DDI 0601 ID121123, AKA 2023-12 instead of latest ARM ARM i.e ARM
> DDI 0487J.a. Please find the definition here.
> 
> https://developer.arm.com/documentation/ddi0601/2023-12/

The K.a release of the ARM ARM has now been published, and that includes
the "0b110000 IMPLEMENTATION DEFINED exception to EL3" value, so we can
point to that now.

With that in mind, for the commit message we can say:

| This patch adds definitions related to the Branch Record Buffer
| Extension (BRBE) as per ARM DDI 0487K.a. These will be used by KVM and
| a BRBE driver in subsequent patches.
|
| Some existing BRBE definitions in asm/sysreg.h are replaced with
| equivalent generated definitions.

Aside from a couple of minor issues below, this looks good to me. With
those fixed up (and the commit message above):

Reviewed-by: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>

[...]

> +Sysreg	BRBIDR0_EL1	2	1	9	2	0
> +Res0	63:16
> +Enum	15:12	CC
> +	0b101	20_BIT
> +EndEnum

Please pad this to the width of the field, i.e.

	0b0101	20_bit

> +Enum	11:8	FORMAT
> +	0b0	0
> +EndEnum

Likewise, this should be padded to the width of the field.

As with the BRBFCR_EL1.BANK definitions, I reckon it's worth givin the
enum value a prefix, so please make this:

	0b0000	FORMAT_0

Mark.

  reply	other threads:[~2024-05-21 13:24 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 29+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2024-04-05  2:46 [PATCH V17 0/9] arm64/perf: Enable branch stack sampling Anshuman Khandual
2024-04-05  2:46 ` [PATCH V17 1/9] arm64/sysreg: Add BRBE registers and fields Anshuman Khandual
2024-05-21 13:24   ` Mark Rutland [this message]
2024-06-03  5:12     ` Anshuman Khandual
2024-04-05  2:46 ` [PATCH V17 2/9] KVM: arm64: Explicitly handle BRBE traps as UNDEFINED Anshuman Khandual
2024-05-21 13:26   ` Mark Rutland
2024-06-03  5:31     ` Anshuman Khandual
2024-04-05  2:46 ` [PATCH V17 3/9] drivers: perf: arm_pmu: Add infrastructure for branch stack sampling Anshuman Khandual
2024-05-21 13:44   ` Mark Rutland
2024-06-03  6:40     ` Anshuman Khandual
2024-04-05  2:46 ` [PATCH V17 4/9] arm64/boot: Enable EL2 requirements for BRBE Anshuman Khandual
2024-05-29 10:51   ` Mark Rutland
2024-06-03  9:11     ` Anshuman Khandual
2024-06-03  9:38       ` Mark Rutland
2024-04-05  2:46 ` [PATCH V17 5/9] drivers: perf: arm_pmuv3: Enable branch stack sampling via FEAT_BRBE Anshuman Khandual
2024-04-05  2:46 ` [PATCH V17 6/9] KVM: arm64: nvhe: Disable branch generation in nVHE guests Anshuman Khandual
2024-04-05  2:46 ` [PATCH V17 7/9] perf: test: Speed up running brstack test on an Arm model Anshuman Khandual
2024-04-05  2:46 ` [PATCH V17 8/9] perf: test: Remove empty lines from branch filter test output Anshuman Khandual
2024-04-05  2:46 ` [PATCH V17 9/9] perf: test: Extend branch stack sampling test for Arm64 BRBE Anshuman Khandual
2024-05-30  9:47 ` [PATCH V17 0/9] arm64/perf: Enable branch stack sampling James Clark
2024-05-30 17:41   ` Mark Rutland
2024-05-31 13:01     ` Mark Rutland
2024-06-06  4:58     ` Anshuman Khandual
2024-06-06  6:27       ` Anshuman Khandual
2024-06-06 11:01       ` James Clark
2024-06-06  3:57   ` Anshuman Khandual
2024-05-30 10:03 ` James Clark
2024-06-03  9:18   ` Anshuman Khandual
2024-06-03  9:39     ` Mark Rutland

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=Zkygkt2a9HBHfmeu@J2N7QTR9R3 \
    --to=mark.rutland@arm.com \
    --cc=acme@kernel.org \
    --cc=anshuman.khandual@arm.com \
    --cc=broonie@kernel.org \
    --cc=catalin.marinas@arm.com \
    --cc=james.clark@arm.com \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-perf-users@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=maz@kernel.org \
    --cc=mingo@redhat.com \
    --cc=peterz@infradead.org \
    --cc=robh@kernel.org \
    --cc=suzuki.poulose@arm.com \
    --cc=will@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).