Re: [PATCH V9 06/13] perf tools: Enable evsel__is_aux_event() to work for S390_CPUMSF

[Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@kernel.org>]

On Tue, Jul 23, 2024 at 12:09:46PM +0300, Adrian Hunter wrote:
> On 23/07/24 11:26, Leo Yan wrote:
> > On 7/15/2024 5:07 PM, Adrian Hunter wrote:
> >>
> >> evsel__is_aux_event() identifies AUX area tracing selected events.
> >>
> >> S390_CPUMSF uses a raw event type (PERF_TYPE_RAW - refer
> >> s390_cpumsf_evsel_is_auxtrace()) not a PMU type value that could be checked
> >> in evsel__is_aux_event(). However it sets needs_auxtrace_mmap (refer
> >> auxtrace_record__init()), so check that first.
> >>
> >> Currently, the features that use evsel__is_aux_event() are used only by
> >> Intel PT, but that may change in the future.
> >>
> >> Signed-off-by: Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@intel.com>
> >> Acked-by: Ian Rogers <irogers@google.com>
> >> Reviewed-by: Andi Kleen <ak@linux.intel.com>
> > 
> > Reviewed-by: Leo Yan <leo.yan@arm.com>
> 
> Namhyung, could we get patches 5 and 6 from this series
> applied?  They are independent and Leo's new patch set is
> dependent on patch 5.

I'm getting those two into tmp.perf-tools-next, probably should pick the
rest as peterz has the kernel bits already in his queue.git/perf/core,
right?

- Arnaldo
 
> > 
> >> ---
> >>  tools/perf/util/pmu.c | 6 +++++-
> >>  1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> >>
> >> diff --git a/tools/perf/util/pmu.c b/tools/perf/util/pmu.c
> >> index 986166bc7c78..0b38c51bd6eb 100644
> >> --- a/tools/perf/util/pmu.c
> >> +++ b/tools/perf/util/pmu.c
> >> @@ -1199,8 +1199,12 @@ void perf_pmu__warn_invalid_formats(struct perf_pmu *pmu)
> >>
> >>  bool evsel__is_aux_event(const struct evsel *evsel)
> >>  {
> >> -       struct perf_pmu *pmu = evsel__find_pmu(evsel);
> >> +       struct perf_pmu *pmu;
> >>
> >> +       if (evsel->needs_auxtrace_mmap)
> >> +               return true;
> >> +
> >> +       pmu = evsel__find_pmu(evsel);
> >>         return pmu && pmu->auxtrace;
> >>  }
> >>
> >> --
> >> 2.34.1
> >>
> >>