From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from smtp.kernel.org (aws-us-west-2-korg-mail-1.web.codeaurora.org [10.30.226.201]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B3E9F183CD4; Mon, 12 Aug 2024 16:35:21 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=10.30.226.201 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1723480521; cv=none; b=LTCgqEH/zEKqj29lnHgqKJfmuOdHeY9BUwDFW1sf+IWgi7SJdOOzvAwewrdd3tGekceKOpFYBnPA8tCyw3eBpdybmIoXP/UPC0gH6i+B7sG4h3Y89pZlvI21BTcg6lj20ge71+8px+3af+KljAnoavXWSvK0A3VTnYTZdWTW6ZQ= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1723480521; c=relaxed/simple; bh=NyaFbORqzBAgAvTSW78fZAxNKl09IffJ6EdbJBvboGE=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:References:MIME-Version: Content-Type:Content-Disposition:In-Reply-To; b=mj9j0sUpVnu6LfMvTuZiEIyouAZ0HtOW84its2J0A/Y8/RUjzthJG9jHG+0Hjl54roxcJnZZIRZ07gGEouZqZDKAWCoxM9xgqnbpph+Sd4B4/+EfugS7wu+uXQLkK9jrkIBi5EdWQD7CdmBcfW0Ld/dAjKn3c/U7RCkMVtBK9Fo= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b=WgguJnHC; arc=none smtp.client-ip=10.30.226.201 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b="WgguJnHC" Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id D79C3C4AF09; Mon, 12 Aug 2024 16:35:20 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=k20201202; t=1723480521; bh=NyaFbORqzBAgAvTSW78fZAxNKl09IffJ6EdbJBvboGE=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:References:In-Reply-To:From; b=WgguJnHCBzfOgFebel30g7EN9MC98XxSFL0XgMv/QMWoW2hXKpfZZxmORLPytvxLj BjP6/mqKSult1mWTckknrbBAZe8xf9LLlwb7i++cKtApIrF2GL1PImO1dkD4FagvdG b602whZfKBVlIFiWoslnpgiZUhsWEX8PxBmyPCYVWE0c1Ti1KHc6hOF2A50cUEogU9 zKq7JnyU28psmj8//rBG0+qEkEjVOtaAQ+Wysxnojnb0jVhL6Ggs/OwJE0AHWN7NON iZc4TMrTGudWxsmnK1WVXFKReCpUExY+wGTIvIyD6yDSSsAd6mXDeZ5bdQryFXNh7/ 4Uczcz3skP1jQ== Date: Mon, 12 Aug 2024 13:35:18 -0300 From: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo To: Ian Rogers Cc: Namhyung Kim , weilin.wang@intel.com, Peter Zijlstra , Ingo Molnar , Alexander Shishkin , Jiri Olsa , Adrian Hunter , Kan Liang , linux-perf-users@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Perry Taylor , Samantha Alt , Caleb Biggers Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH v18 0/8] TPEBS counting mode support Message-ID: References: <20240720062102.444578-1-weilin.wang@intel.com> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-perf-users@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit In-Reply-To: On Mon, Aug 12, 2024 at 08:38:06AM -0700, Ian Rogers wrote: > On Tue, Aug 6, 2024 at 7:35 AM Ian Rogers wrote: > > On Tue, Aug 6, 2024 at 6:32 AM Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo wrote: > > > For now I'm removing the whole series from perf-tools-next. > > > > Ugh. > > Hi, what's the plan here? The topdown (aka TMA) metrics on recent > Intel CPUs (client and server) are dependent on timed PEBS. I think we > should land this series and move forward from there. I'm taking this as an Acked-by, merged the 3rd and 4th patches to keep bisectability and constified the process_sample_event() perf_tool pointer, test building with containers now. Will push to tmp.perf-tools-next while that runs. - Arnaldo